Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How on Earth did Rachel M. screw THIS one up? (Original Post) Ken Burch Apr 2016 OP
She was much more interested in demeaning Bernie than accuracy. nt revbones Apr 2016 #1
Yep. That's how it happens. dchill Apr 2016 #2
The giggling while talking about Bernie was beyond the pale. nt revbones Apr 2016 #3
For fucks sake, she corrected it issue. Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #9
The thmartest girl in the history of tv??? Peregrine Took Apr 2016 #4
Well, she admitted they'd mixed up the names a few minutes later. n/t, Ken Burch Apr 2016 #5
Actually, they mixed up the photos. The label was correct - it said No Vested Interest Apr 2016 #8
You're right...it was the photos, not the names. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #14
Rachel has lost all credibility MissDeeds Apr 2016 #6
Why? Because she isn't brown nosing Bernie? Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #10
No, because she's brown nosing Hillary. Gene Debs Apr 2016 #16
Exactly. SoapBox Apr 2016 #18
Then you aren't watching. Adrahil Apr 2016 #23
I noticed it immediately. moondust Apr 2016 #7
It's not as if she herself did it. Someone who works behind the scenes screwed up. cui bono Apr 2016 #11
Ah but she runs a Non Union show whose budget goes mostly to the anchor chair and that's Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #27
^ This ^ Myrina Apr 2016 #29
She makes $7mn/year and has a non-union production??? cui bono Apr 2016 #30
"She" didn't select the wrong picture. madamesilverspurs Apr 2016 #12
I wasn't calling it a "conspiracy". Ken Burch Apr 2016 #15
It could have been worse. Frank Cannon Apr 2016 #26
Or this guy: Ken Burch Apr 2016 #28
She also thinks Establishment = Progressive! JoeOtterbein Apr 2016 #13
RM - A New Member Of The 1% - What More Would One Expect cantbeserious Apr 2016 #17
I caught it immediately. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #19
Rachel Maddow, The DNC, and MSNBC are no longer credible. erlewyne Apr 2016 #20
Waiting for Hillary to be blamed for this. Justice Apr 2016 #21
Did you watch after the commercial break... Stellar Apr 2016 #22
I noted it in this thread that she owned the blooper. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #24
And you see how much good it did, with certain DU participants. Paladin Apr 2016 #25

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
8. Actually, they mixed up the photos. The label was correct - it said
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:30 AM
Apr 2016

Sen. King, ME.
I didn't hear the correction/apology - I had moved on to another network.
However, I don't blame Rachel - it was likely an assistant - clueless- who found and chose the photo of Rep. King from NY.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
18. Exactly.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:01 AM
Apr 2016

I at a minimum expect her to report fairly.

Instead she blatantly shills for Hill.

She lost ALL credibility.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
23. Then you aren't watching.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:51 AM
Apr 2016

She has frequently been critical, and supportive of BOTH candidates. When reporting breathlessly about the size of Bernie's crowd, she has said, "can you feel the Bern?" At least two timea while I've watched. She had a whole segment a week or so ago about how competitive Bernie is after being dismissed by so many.

But in Bernie land, if you say anything nice about Clinton, or questioning Nernie's path to the nomination, then you are in the tank for Hillary.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
7. I noticed it immediately.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:09 AM
Apr 2016

As soon as they put up the graphic. I was kind of surprised that she came back and acknowledged it after they had finished the segment.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
11. It's not as if she herself did it. Someone who works behind the scenes screwed up.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:32 AM
Apr 2016

Now if you want to complain about how she kept repeating how many senators had endorsed Hillary and that Bernie just got his first senate endorsement, rant on. She just can't help herself. It's so disgusting.

.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
27. Ah but she runs a Non Union show whose budget goes mostly to the anchor chair and that's
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:54 AM
Apr 2016

why you see errors that glare and also why there is so much repetition in her material, she's got fearful second rate staff and no one on it is her peer. An excellent anchor always has a counterpart producer that shapes and checks the work. Rachel has Rachel and Rachel says Rachel's writing is perfect and her staff is good enough.

madamesilverspurs

(15,805 posts)
12. "She" didn't select the wrong picture.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:32 AM
Apr 2016

One of her staffers did, but she took responsibility for it. There was no foul, no offense, and both Kings likely got a chuckle out of it.

Stuff happens. Not everything is an evil conspiracy. Time to get a grip, kiddies.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
15. I wasn't calling it a "conspiracy".
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:35 AM
Apr 2016

Just couldn't understand how anyone on a show like that, even a staffer, could get those two guys mixed up. You'd think they'd have one of those posters with a picture of everybody in the House and the Senate up on the wall in the office.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
22. Did you watch after the commercial break...
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:34 AM
Apr 2016

when she admitted to 'all' the errors in that segment, or were you just looking for something to dump all over Maddow. She was always good at correctng her mistakes, if not her opinions.

They at MSNBC probably got some new help from FOX 'snews' ...seeing that they are trying to attract more Republic0n eyes to there show.

Paladin

(28,264 posts)
25. And you see how much good it did, with certain DU participants.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:18 AM
Apr 2016

If you people don't like Rachel, just stop watching her. These non-stop critiques are tiresome.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How on Earth did Rachel M...