Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:46 AM Apr 2016

Senator Warren Remarks Too Big To Fail Scenario is Scary

In a startling revelation today the FDIC stated five major banks flunked on their regulatory compliance and Senator Elizabeth Warren remarked that:

"

This announcement is a very big deal...it's scary.


Warren further added:

And it means that, unless these banks promptly address the concerns identified by the regulators, the government must push these banksvto get smaller and less complex


Read more:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/regulators-flunk-banks-fdic-federal-reserve-221880



Regulators said JPMorgan Chase and other banks failed to show that they could be safely unwound during bankruptcy. | AP Photo

[br][hr][br]

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senator Warren Remarks Too Big To Fail Scenario is Scary (Original Post) laserhaas Apr 2016 OP
Thank you for posting. /nt think Apr 2016 #1
U R welcome laserhaas Apr 2016 #2
The Banks will not be broken up in time Hydra Apr 2016 #3
Like they handed Obama a mess laserhaas Apr 2016 #4
Bernie could do a lot with that, which is why they don't want him in Hydra Apr 2016 #5
Ouch...Could be a Blank :-! ein or Dimon scheme laserhaas Apr 2016 #6
Clinton's wait until the banks are in trouble to break them doesn't seem like such a great idea. Skwmom Apr 2016 #9
If anything, they would be the ones to benefit from it Hydra Apr 2016 #13
Correct...like JP Morgan did off gobble up laserhaas Apr 2016 #15
Question - isn't JP going down with the fossil fuel energy sector? n/t malaise Apr 2016 #23
JP should have been indicted for Petters Ponzi frauds laserhaas Apr 2016 #24
Bump. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #7
No Elizabeth. They need to be broken up. Only a FOOL thinks the risks can be managed. Skwmom Apr 2016 #8
I don't know if Bernie can nationalize them passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #10
"Smaller" and "less complex" are two separate questions though, aren't they? Recursion Apr 2016 #11
Correct..Not mutually exclusive... laserhaas Apr 2016 #12
Frankly, it's the size of their influence Hydra Apr 2016 #14
I'm not so sure...when dominoes fall..they continue to do so laserhaas Apr 2016 #16
5 of the 6 largest banks are at risk and if even one of them jwirr Apr 2016 #17
When we halt...Too Big to Jail laserhaas Apr 2016 #18
That also. But even if we put some bankers into jail and do jwirr Apr 2016 #19
Im trying jwirr.. We have enough evidence to get Bain laserhaas Apr 2016 #20
Thank you. Very glad that there are people who know how to jwirr Apr 2016 #21
Possibly..It aint easy...to take down big sleazy laserhaas Apr 2016 #22
There will be... sendero Apr 2016 #25

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
3. The Banks will not be broken up in time
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:05 AM
Apr 2016

We're right on the edge of another major crash...and the establishment will bail them out again with nary a sharp word for them.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
5. Bernie could do a lot with that, which is why they don't want him in
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:11 AM
Apr 2016

He could nationalize them and clean the whole system up if they hard crash again while he is in office. They would much rather have a status quo supporter who will "Get things done" for them.

If they do get someone willing to prop them up again...there may only be one bank left at the end- the mega-bank of all megas.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
6. Ouch...Could be a Blank :-! ein or Dimon scheme
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:15 AM
Apr 2016

To become a Rothschild equal.
.
Could ig be....only 1 bank in America?

Ouch!

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
9. Clinton's wait until the banks are in trouble to break them doesn't seem like such a great idea.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:03 AM
Apr 2016


But wait, all of the fucking geniuses that support her told us it was the bestest idea EVER. Unfortunately, it's not those schmucks that will be harmed.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
13. If anything, they would be the ones to benefit from it
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:56 AM
Apr 2016

A handful of people made billions during the first crash, and others were able to gobble up other banks and assets, reducing competition and giving them even more leverage.

I'm of the opinion that 2006-2008 was not an accident...and neither with the next one be.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
15. Correct...like JP Morgan did off gobble up
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:06 AM
Apr 2016

Lrhman and Bear going down spread the billions qround

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
24. JP should have been indicted for Petters Ponzi frauds
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

As for me....t g e preponderance if the evidences are against Dachs & Bain Cap

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. "Smaller" and "less complex" are two separate questions though, aren't they?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:16 AM
Apr 2016

Which one is the real problem? The absolute size of the companies? Their size relative to GDP? The diversity of their offerings? People really need to come up with some answers here.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
14. Frankly, it's the size of their influence
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:58 AM
Apr 2016

Nothing is really too big to fail...but too big to control is a different story.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
16. I'm not so sure...when dominoes fall..they continue to do so
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:20 AM
Apr 2016

After my letters to Holder's DOJ ...his argument that they must also consider the economic impact ...didn't fall upon a deaf ear
.
That's why...if our eToys case were to see justice...I believe Goldman Sachs losing it's IPO biz is sufficient.
.
Bian Capital....on the otger hand...sprouted from Salvadoran death squad lords...contknued with Miljen fraud monies & bribed judge in Stage Stores dealings (see Taibbi's "Greed and Debt" thag I'm one of sources of).
.
Then continued with The Learning Company merger with Mattel that lost billions and spawned a corrupt United States Attorney (Colm Connolly)
.
A RICO seizure of Bain Capital has tremendous value and the collapse hatms no one because seizures would be of compsnies like Clear Channel (headed BK anyway)....

Also Burger King....Guitar Center...Jumbo Sports ( in bankruptcy.....AGAIN)....Hospital (HCA) Toys R Us ( not before we get back our eToys brand name)

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
17. 5 of the 6 largest banks are at risk and if even one of them
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:24 AM
Apr 2016

fail it could very likely effect the economy of the whole world. That is why they are called "too big to fail" because they can bring the whole economy down around our heads. That is why we had NO choice but to bail them out in 2008. This needs to stop.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
19. That also. But even if we put some bankers into jail and do
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:19 PM
Apr 2016

not break up the banks they will still be too big to fail.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
20. Im trying jwirr.. We have enough evidence to get Bain
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:25 PM
Apr 2016

RICO'd and make Blankfein resign
.
Just need one honorable federal prosecutor

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
21. Thank you. Very glad that there are people who know how to
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:31 PM
Apr 2016

get this done. I think Teddy Roosevelt must have felt this way also.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
25. There will be...
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:40 PM
Apr 2016

... another banking crisis in the US and it will probably be worse than the last one. Dodd-Frank is something, but it was not nearly enough.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senator Warren Remarks To...