General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO
vote blue no matter who
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO
vote blue no matter who
VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO
vote blue no matter who
33 votes, 13 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes I will vote blue, no matter who | |
1 (3%) |
|
I will vote blue up and down the ballot | |
28 (85%) |
|
Am I in the wrong place? | |
4 (12%) |
|
13 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
revbones
(3,660 posts)rurallib
(62,423 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)your loyalty to anything. It seems to be a touchy subject for you.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Such as those that found fault with the term "corporate whore"? Nope. I just commented on the 999,987th loyalty pledge post.
And I didn't even do it the way many Hillary followers do on Bernie posts with some drivel such as "cool story, bro" or some such crap.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)except to try to coerce those with principles into giving them up. Sure.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)" Nope. I just commented on the 999,987th loyalty pledge post..."
Clever way to rationalize a distinction lacking a difference. No doubt, your justification will be given all the consideration in fact, warrants.
(though to be honest, fake outrage about non-existent loyalty oaths are better served with a melodramatic soundtrack (I'd suggest Hans Zimmer, but your tastes may vary), some noir lighting and extreme closeups... otherwise, it comes across as little more in sincerity than Christian heavy metal bands.)
Better luck next time.
revbones
(3,660 posts)A Hillary follower lecturing about fake outrage.
Lancero
(3,003 posts)You might be at the wrong website.
revbones
(3,660 posts)But if you think a pledge is necessary to get votes rather than the candidate earning them, well you might belong at a Republican site.
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Vote Blue is a shorter way of saying Vote Democrat.
Someone calls for people to Vote Blue, you attack it as a loyalty pledge.
You're the one who called voting blue a loyalty pledge, not me. So please, explain just which of your own words I decided to twist.
revbones
(3,660 posts)It's basically trying to get you to agree to suck it up and support a candidate your principles may not allow you to. It's cheap and tiring and gets fired off periodically here by Hillary supporters who assume that she's got it in the bag and the dirty hippie Bernie supporters absolutely must come around and support the corrupt lying candidate otherwise the world will end.
It gets old really quick. Where is the line for you guys? Is it always support the democrat no matter what? What could they do to make you not support them? Is the D behind the name magical or something?
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Is those who keep on complaining about voting for Democrats when they don't even really need to respond to the thread if they don't like the subject. There are a hell of a lot of posts I don't like, and guess what, I just don't respond, it's really that easy!
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Voting Blue isn't always voting for someone though - It can also be a vote against.
You can either Vote Blue to support a canidate, or you can Vote Blue just to vote against Red.
Feel free to support whoever you wish. But calling Vote Blue a loyalty pledge just shows your true colors.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)very clear real fast that there are severe problems.
They won't need a poll to figure out what will be painfully obvious.
Funtatlaguy
(10,879 posts)In the primary, you fall in love.
When you lose, you fall in line in the general.
In a two party system, there really is no choice.
Especially since there are so sane Republicans left.
rurallib
(62,423 posts)Welcome to DU and thanks for the accidental laugh
Iggo
(47,558 posts)rurallib
(62,423 posts)some folks take things so seriously.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)business even if you think that's all just good fun passing laws against minority groups is just a lark, something to fill the time, not serious at all....
It's the 'no matter who' part that suggests this is your objective.
rurallib
(62,423 posts)this may be the post that finally pushes me out of DU.
I believe you have to really be digging to come up with that.
Things have certainly been really strange around here for the last year. I almost dropped out once but kind of half came back. Now I think maybe I should have left.
FYI, to me if someone is a democrat they are by definition pro gay, pro trans, pro choice etc.
Adios for a while DU
dembotoz
(16,808 posts)i have encountered a very scummy lying asshole dem where i left the ballot spot blank
sometime you know too much
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Except one.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I am a registered Democrat and will vote my conscience.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)My vote must be earned, and I will not succumb to those who say "the other side is always worse."
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Mary Mac
(323 posts)Don't do straight ticket but 99% donkey.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)like marijuana legalization.
If I was forced to vote for someone like Debbie Wasserman Schultz who supports sending terminally ill cancer patients to prison for using medical marijuana, I might leave that box blank.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)I'll be sure to write in Bernie this November. Because there's no way I'm voting for Hillary in my life.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)Silly question.
rurallib
(62,423 posts)Looking good
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Democrat.
We need to elect a government, not just a President.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Do I have to vote for him too? How about Kim Davis, who only recently left the party? There are still others with teh "D" next to their name who oppose gay rights, abortion, etc.
They get my vote no matter what, just because of the "D"?
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/09/meet-the-pro-life-democrat-who-is-taking-on-pro-abortion-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders/
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)master, I vote bluuue no matter whooo, vote bluuue no matter whooo, vote bluue ...
basselope
(2,565 posts)B/c she ain't "blue"
truegrit44
(332 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)DLC. Third Way types.
No, not in the least.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)from this site.
Can't happen soon enough.
Sanders or Clinton, I'll vote Democratic this year, as always.
If you aren't, then you can go to
basselope
(2,565 posts)And then you can all cry together when you lose the GE and wonder "why.. why".
It wouldn't be the first time.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)and oh look there it is.
basselope
(2,565 posts)I joined originally in 2001 when I saw the banner for Democratic Underground at the first bush inauguration.
Stayed here until 2004 when the democratic party betrayed its own values and picked a war voter as its candidate.
Don't remember my log in name and have no access to the e-mail address I had in 2001 (or even sure which one.. it was either at verizon.net or aol.com) but both are long retired.
But, just like I warned in 2004 when people jumped on the Kerry bandwagon that you had no chance of winning then, I'll tell you again... Clinton has no chance of winning.
So.. just like before, go retreat back to your safe bubble and cry together and wonder why you lost.
That is, if you done come to your collective senses by then.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)and go home.
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out this time.
basselope
(2,565 posts)No values. Just about #winning.
However, when you only focus on #winning, you wind up losing.
These democrats don't have Tiger Blood.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)majority opinion in the group or side you chose and trying harder next time.
You walk away after losing so suck it with your false platitudes.
You quit when you don't get your way.
You use your candidates losing as a chance to quit because you're a selfish sore loser.
Like a baby child who doesn't get their way.
Your straw man is your principles because you're a dilettante who can't lose and take it like a grown-up.
I started out this primary supporting Bernie but it's attitudes like yours that have really soured me on the movement.
Through the good times and bad I've fought for this party for 36 fucking years and pretend Democrats with a Holier than Thou attitude about politics, like you, will kill the party and country along with it.
Which might be your plan all along newb.
basselope
(2,565 posts)This is EXACTLY what George Washington warned about.. putting "party" before country.
I walk away when the party fails to represent my values.
I didn't vote for Bill Clinton, I didn't vote for John Kerry, I didn't vote for Barack Obama and I never EVER planned to vote for Hillary Clinton.
The ONLY reason I wasted a moment to reregister as a democrat from independent is because of Bernie Sanders and if he doesn't win.. then.. yeah, Buh Bye.
What I find selfish and baby like are those people who will vote for a democrat no matter what. Not 100% pro choice like Hillary? Who cares, its a democrat. For war? Who cares. Democrat. Free trade deals? why not.. democrat? A health care policy devised by the heritage foundation?? Sure, I'll vote for that.. DEMOCRAT!
PATHETIC. SELFISH AND CHILDISH.
Luckily, this time, you ain't gonna win b/c the corporate shill candidate is so incredibly weak.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)But, hardly hurts my feelings. I feel sorry for people who don't see the big picture.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)was definitely not a democrat.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Sorry the truth hurts.
Obama isn't a democrat either. He is the best republican president of my lifetime, but not a democrat.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)And is not a democrat.
basselope
(2,565 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)You know, ones that don't send people off to die for oil.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Aren't democrats, your statements sound delusional
basselope
(2,565 posts)Wouldn't be the first time the "leaders" don't represent the whole.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)they do represent the whole.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Which is why the party is in such a mess right now.
It is also why they have shrunk to 29% of the population and there are far more independents right now b/c the party ignored them.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)was that someone else i was thinking about?
basselope
(2,565 posts)Hardly makes him "leadership"
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)He won fair and square against several primary opponents. And then he went on to win two general elections.
basselope
(2,565 posts)He barely won the first primary and then LOST 10MM votes int he second election.
And his chosen successor is clinging to her lead by her claws.
Leader? No.
Establishment? Yes.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)That's not holding on by her claws, that's straight up winning.
They are both democrats. They are both leaders of the party. You're delusion about the base of the Democratic Party if you believe otherwise.
basselope
(2,565 posts)The fact that she has had to rely on vote suppression and closed primaries speaks volumes.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)regardless of party
Ohio Joe
(21,758 posts)I will vote Blue.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)thats all i can say
Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Also not for those who boast of their endorsements. In NC five Democrats voted for that hate law. You are saying you would vote for them and I'm saying I would not.
DookDook
(166 posts)I remember learning in elementary school that the reason that the voting booth has a curtain was because nobody had the right to know who you voted for.
I'll be voting for the candidate that thinks the way I do about the issues that I find important. If that candidate is blue, they'll have my vote. If the candidate doesn't reflect my views, well, maybe they should rethink their position of capital punishment, for profit prisons, campaign finance reform, the climate, etc. if they want my vote.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)be private unless you choose to disclose it. This was the first rule in working as a volunteer for non-profits.
I changed my registration from independent only to vote for Senator Sanders in the fiasco of a primary in Arizona. My vote goes to the Democratic Party when it counts. I always vote. I always vote by mail when it is an option.
Crabby Abbey
(66 posts)She does not reflect my values and I have never in my life voted for someone I despised. Sorry Team Blue.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)in the democratic primaries.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Party loyalists are being played for chumps by the Party bosses.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)Throw your vote to the Greens?
Sit out the election?
Hold your nose and vote "D"?
I'll probably hold my nose.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)to run more Neoliberals.
The only way to rid ourselves of Neoliberals is not to vote for them.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)I thought I was voting for the principles of democracy, and the survival of the species.
I did not know that it was all a cabal for the Blue Man Group
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)nothing...oh she kept quiet. If I vote then I'm voting for a color that is not my fav. My fav is purple and pink...
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And, I don't sign or abide by loyalty oaths.
The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. Friedrich Nietzsche
Reter
(2,188 posts)I have also voted for Bloomberg. I reserve the right not to vote party line.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Indeed some might say it's a duty of voters to vote to change party systems and governments when systematically parties and governments yield evidence year after year that the party and the government no longer supports the people.
Here is a bit of what the Founding Fathers had to say about this in the Declaration of Independence:
Now, if you reread that replacing the word despotism with oligarchy and government with party you get the point in terms of this campaign cycle.
People backing Sanders' revolution in political thinking feel that sentiment. Like Sanders, they are currently working -inside the Party- NOT BECAUSE THEY LIKE IT, but because it is their -duty- to change it from the corrupted servant of the big donor class.
If the party makes it impossible to change from within, it guarantees a future in which it will face a similar number of voters from outside.