General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMembers of Congress Call for End to Mass Voter Suppression and Insecure Elections
Members of Congress Call for End to Mass Voter Suppression and Insecure Elections
Friday, 29 April 2016 00:00 By Ben Ptashnik and Victoria Collier, Truthout | News Analysis
Congressional briefings are typically dull affairs, usually with only a few dozen participants, but it was standing room only in a House Judiciary Committee hearing room on April 21, when nine members of Congress, their staff and 200 activists gathered to address the present crisis in US democracy: voter suppression and the manipulation of US elections.
In 2016 - the first presidential election since the US Supreme Court's gutting of the Voting Rights Act - a slew of new malicious laws and tactics are disenfranchising millions of Americans, even as the private control of US vote-counting technology has come under renewed scrutiny in a primary season marked by allegations of fraud and election rigging.
This high-stakes, emotionally charged election cycle has seen widespread closure of polling locations, unprecedented voter roll purges, voting machine failures and extreme waiting lines that cause countless voters to turn away without having cast a ballot. Many have been given "provisional" ballots that are simply not counted. Irregularities in Arizona, North Carolina, Wisconsin and New York have engendered intraparty accusations and lawsuits, exposing a dysfunctional and often undemocratic election process.
The nine members of Congress who spoke, all from predominantly minority districts, loudly condemned the "new Jim Crow" laws that have been forced on over half the states in the US, and which the lawmakers believe were designed to deliberately suppress voters in their districts, particularly people of color, the poor, the elderly and students.
Representatives included the dean of the House and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, John Conyers, and longtime civil rights champion Elijah Cummings. Others who made passionate and sometimes angry statements included Representatives G. K. Butterfield (co-chair of the Congressional Black Caucus), Sheila Jackson Lee, Terri Sewell, Maxine Waters, Marc Veasey, Alma Adams and Hank Johnson.
The briefing's sponsors, the National Election Defense Coalition and the Transformative Justice Coalition, support the urgent call for a new legislative agenda and political fusion movement to protect democracy, restore voting rights and ensure that every ballot cast is also counted in a secure, public, transparent process.
"There is a very insidious, treacherous and deceitful method of voter suppression, and it has to do with the integrity of the voting process itself."
more...
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/35846-members-of-congress-call-for-end-to-mass-voter-suppression-and-insecure-elections
procon
(15,805 posts)The nine members of Congress who spoke, all from predominantly minority districts,
So, essentially this is just for show and it means nothing. Gotta love 'em, but they are in the minority and we all know the Republicans will not agree to change anything that favors getting more Republicans elected.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)most endorsers of our probable nominee for president. 9 isn't many, but they're not nothing either. Good for our side!
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)A) There were only NINE Democratic members of Congress, and
B) They represented primarily minority districts.
I find it absolutely disgusting that the Democratic Party isn't protesting voter suppression and rigged elections EN MASSE. This should be one of the main Party platforms, right up there with income inequality and civil rights. (Indeed, voter caging and voter suppression is part of the civil rights movement that was repealed by the Roberts SCOTUS, and should be a top priority for the Democratic Party.)
Non-partisan election districts, and drawing congressional district maps should also be part of the Democratic Party Platform. Clinton and Sanders should be talking about these issues on every campaign stop, and so should every (D) Congressman and Senator.
If the (largely) stupid, corrupt, and amoral Democratic Party every wants to become relevant again, they need to start hammering away at three key issues:
1. Income disparity and the rise of a plutocracy over a democracy
2. Campaign finance reform (related to item 1, I suppose)
3. Democratic reforms to eliminate voter suppression, voter caging, and partisan gerrymandering of election districts; and a Constitutional amendment to guarantee the right to vote.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)All Democrats should be out en masse demanding total reform of the election process in this country. And making allot of noise after elections ain't going to get it. Shit don't change unless you change it! Put the hammer down and get it done NOW!
2naSalit
(86,647 posts)I have to wonder just what Trojan Horse attachments(riders) are included. These sorry specimens never pass anything that is beneficial to the common folk without stabbing us in the back with poison riders attached.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)come up with some really nasty ones.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)questionseverything
(9,656 posts)Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Georgia) brought much needed attention to a crucial aspect of the election crisis: the aging, hackable voting technology used nationwide. Johnson cited the fact that the vote-counting software in these machines is still programmed by a cadre of private companies on proprietary software inaccessible to elections officials and the public.
"There is a very insidious, treacherous and deceitful method of voter suppression," stated Johnson, "and it has to do with the integrity of the voting process itself."
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Our "elections" have become a joke, not just in the Developed World,
but in some 3rd World countries that have transparent, verifiable elections.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)The PTB have the whole fugging thing rigged from top to bottom.
Bernie was going to poke a hole through it for the first time in a long time, but a lot of people have been duped.
That being said, it's only over when you quit trying.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)when it was clear this was going on?
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)That was my 1st red flag.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)2012 - Philadelphia was tense. This country will do anything to take the vote away from non white people. I don't trust the dominant culture to do the right thing. At least these nine are trying to bring the WASP Republicans to heel. They have it coming.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)There is no voter fraud, only election fraud!
tom_kelly
(960 posts)Congress realizes that something has to be put out there to make it appear that this is being addressed. The handlers have given the green light to this small appearance.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Doesn't matter which half of the establishment this comes from - it's just nice-sounding verbiage.
democrank
(11,096 posts)Let`s hope this goes somewhere.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Every computer vote should have a paper trail, no for profit private corporation should control the voting machines' proprietary software that is inaccessible to elections officials and the public.
Election day should be a holiday so more working people actually have time to vote.
That's just to begin with.
Thanks for the thread, babylonsister.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)Agreed with all of your points.
Stevepol
(4,234 posts)"This high-stakes, emotionally charged election cycle has seen widespread closure of polling locations, unprecedented voter roll purges, voting machine failures and extreme waiting lines that cause countless voters to turn away without having cast a ballot. Many have been given "provisional" ballots that are simply not counted. Irregularities in Arizona, North Carolina, Wisconsin and New York have engendered intraparty accusations and lawsuits, exposing a dysfunctional and often undemocratic election process."
Not to mention . . .
Let's take MA as an example. John Brakey mentioned in his interview with the "Sane Progressive" that the 3% of voters in MA whose votes were counted BY HAND, favored Bernie by 17%
In MA 3% of the precincts refused to take the voting machines, choosing instead to HAND COUNT THE PAPER BALLOTS.
Jon Simon (CODE RED), in analyzing the Coakley/Brown 2010 senate race, says that the Handcounters went for Coakley by 2% but the rest of the state went for Brown by 5%, an outcome that statistically (considering the demographics and size of the sample group) was about as nearly "impossible" as it could have been.
If that's true what about the Handcounters giving Bernie a 17% win?
When is just ONE HONEST POLITICIAN GOING TO DEMAND THAT EVERY RACE COUNTED BY ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES BE AUDITED!!! And if the results are suspicious, as I'm sure some will be, to RECOUNT the whole election BY HAND.
roody
(10,849 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)NBachers
(17,122 posts)NJCher
(35,687 posts)Are you listening?
Cher
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Correctional Facility Leavenworth, KS. I'll send you some socks.
NBachers
(17,122 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)and relive old times with your former cellies.
Vote2016
(1,198 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER PAPER and HAND HELD INK PENS
kadaholo
(304 posts)Would have been nice if this righteous indignation on the part of our elected leaders about voter suppression, election fraud and election rigging had been voiced before the primaries...just saying' ....
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Such a count-up clock would be a daily reminder of how many days it has been since President Obama submitted Garland's name to the Senate to fill the seat that opened up with the passing of Scalia. Along the way it could show Garland's nomination wait passing each of the other 8 sitting Justices along the way. This issue needs constant visibility and this would do that. This also ties into the subject matter because it was a Supreme Court decision that set this all in motion.