Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
Sun May 8, 2016, 09:26 AM May 2016

corporation tries to bully city and loses :Uber in Austin

teh city of austin passed a law that would have required Uber and lyft drivers to get fingerprint checks before driving. it would have also banned then from picking up and dropping off passengers in traffic lanes.

Uber and Lyft decided to try and get the law overturned at the ballot box. They wrote a ballot proposition and got enough signatures to put if on the ballot. then they spend almost 9 million dollars to get the repeal passed, which was over 7x the amount that was spend on the last mayoral election. they threatend to leave town over fingerprints.

their opponents on the other hand spend 80x less to keep the fingerprint law.
Uber and Lyft were sending out political flyers at the rate of 3-4 a day in my mailbox. a lot of the claims made on their flyers where misleading at best

yesterday was the election. Uber lost 56-44.
while they say they are leaving tomorrow morning other ride sharing companies have already said they are staying.

If Uber hadnt tried to bully austin they would have probably won. but they went so far overboard that austin said enough is enough.

goodbye Uber. dont let the door hit you on the way out



15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
corporation tries to bully city and loses :Uber in Austin (Original Post) rdking647 May 2016 OP
Libertarian Uber, meet government of the people. Kip Humphrey May 2016 #1
Good... awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #2
now that they lost rdking647 May 2016 #3
Ha! Uber was husslin' their "My way or the highway" model. Eleanors38 May 2016 #5
Good to see the activism of Old School Austin beat this issue back. Eleanors38 May 2016 #4
getme is on eof the new ride sharing companies rdking647 May 2016 #7
I call it High-fructose Libertarianism. Grassroots ain't there, just the usual millions. Eleanors38 May 2016 #12
Excellent! Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #6
I've used it once or twice and don't really have strong feeling about Uber either way, but zappaman May 2016 #13
I voted against Prop 1 Texasgal May 2016 #8
and a rethug legislator already want to overturn austins law rdking647 May 2016 #9
Heh. "Government over-reach." Eleanors38 May 2016 #14
& George PEE Shrub said (Google it) "ATX" is a loser UTUSN May 2016 #10
Democracy at work. Nye Bevan May 2016 #11
Uber will "drive" itself away, or compromise, stay, and make millions. Eleanors38 May 2016 #15
 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
3. now that they lost
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:33 PM
May 2016

its amazing how they are blaming their defeat on over reaching government.

new york city requires fingerprinting of Uber drivers. i dont see Uber threatening to leave there


 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
4. Good to see the activism of Old School Austin beat this issue back.
Sun May 8, 2016, 01:04 PM
May 2016

The GOP and the RW have fought long and hard to neutralize and defeat the remnant of progressive politics in Austin. Get this: the Uber/Lyft axis out spent the opposition $9,000,000 to $200,00. For a week I received two cardboard mailings a day from this High-Fructose Libertarian outfit; I think folks got sick of their agitprop.

The betting is Uber will head for the capitol to get some Austin-bashing (Moscow-on-the-Colorado) legislation through which would give the Billionaires line-item legislation. If they don't get their way, there might be some competition here for surface transport services. One tech commentator said the over all biz model for ride sharing is simple and not very capital intensive. Uber doesn't want the competition, esp. if drivers form co-ops. In the mean time, other smaller companies have already agreed to follow the rules Uber was breaking, so there must be a profit to be made.

 

rdking647

(5,113 posts)
7. getme is on eof the new ride sharing companies
Sun May 8, 2016, 07:57 PM
May 2016

i wouldnt have even bothered voting in the election if it wasnt for ubers heavy handed tactics. daily they filled my mailbox with junk,plus texting customers in violation of fcc rules etc made me think they needed to be taken down a notch or 10

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
13. I've used it once or twice and don't really have strong feeling about Uber either way, but
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:19 PM
May 2016

I'm curious why you think it's a blight?

Texasgal

(17,045 posts)
8. I voted against Prop 1
Sun May 8, 2016, 08:18 PM
May 2016

and I am glad we won!

Uber: You cannot set up shop in my fair city and not follow the rules. You cannot operate willy nilly. I know you are not leaving because Austin is your cash cow. Stop the whining and get back to work.

Thank you citizens of Austin! We will not tolerate million dollar corporations to push us around!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
11. Democracy at work.
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:53 PM
May 2016

If Austin wants to pass regulations that drive Uber and Lyft away they have every right to do so. But if I lived in Austin I would be royally pissed, as I love Uber.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»corporation tries to bull...