Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,269 posts)
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 06:37 PM Jun 2012

This one I suppose might come under the "Know Your Enemy" file.

The Chicago School - of economic thinking anyway - spawned all kinds of evil under whose weight we are now staggering and chafing. These bastards started it in the viper pit known ordinarily as the University of Chicago.

I'm just wondering if ANYONE on our side has thought about how to combat the metastasizing spread of this societal toxin. Is there ANY push-back at all? ANY preventive or even containment strategies to keep this shit from spreading and doing any more damage? If we don't, it's us - our movement - our whole belief system - that's endangered.

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-06-07/will-success-spoil-the-chicago-school

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
1. The result it has and is consistently yielding is already discrediting it. Dr.'s Krugman and
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 06:48 PM
Jun 2012

Stiglitz are and have been working full time on this as well. If it weren't for so many politicians from both sides of the aisle and the M$M's complete subjugation to it, it would already be forgotten as a bad idea that somehow caught on for a minute before we regained our sanity.

The Chicago School's idiocy is already dead, it just hasn't had sufficient time to begin the process of decomposition.

calimary

(81,269 posts)
2. I hope so. It's always seemed, for YEARS now, that Paul Krugman is truly the lone voice of sanity
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 06:57 PM
Jun 2012

crying in the wilderness.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. Another side question: What is the University of Chicago teaching now? Are they still pushing this
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jun 2012

idiocy?

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
5. Yes.
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 07:10 PM
Jun 2012

One of the idiocies is that so-called "free-trade" benefits all of us in the long run. The Chicago's free-trade backers are still supporting this.

You might ask yourself, if so-called "free trade" agreements obviously have not worked, what are the odds that another one will be signed? Rmoney would obviously sign one. But what about President Obama, the president with close advisors from the Chicago School of Economics? He wouldn't sign another one would he?

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
6. There was a nut bag Professor from the esteemed University on with Dylan Ratigan last week
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jun 2012

Said we shouldn't have regulations, class action law suits would keep the market honest. Of course Ratigan loved him, and not one guest pushed back hard on the guy and asked him if he really thought the same group of Patriotic Americans wouldn't; push through tort reform, set up multiple corporations for the risky endeavors and when sued, simply use bankruptcy and shut down the offending corps while having transferred the profits to a off shore corporation.

It was truly a fucking sickening segment to watch.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
4. The Chicago School of Economics has done more than merely cause harm to our economic system,
Sun Jun 10, 2012, 07:02 PM
Jun 2012

and possibley irrevocable harm.

It has also infected the judicial system in the Seventh Circuit under Chief Judge Richard Posner, and it has infected other Circuits as well. The thinking has been used to justify decisions which are adverse to the population as a whole. Just as one example, in the Seventh Circuit (Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana), it is virtually impossible to bring an age discrimination case in a Federal District Court because the judges of the Seventh Circuit are opposed to the bringing of age discrimination cases against corporations. As another, example, it is virtually impossible to bring a civil Rico case against those operating under the cover of a business. These are not the only examples that could be laid out.

Since the 2008 bail outs, Judge Posner (who lectures at the University of Chicago) has pulled back from his the-corporations-can-do-no-wrong philosophy (which is now too obvious for all to ignore), but even his modified stance which seems to be evolving still protects big business at the expense of everything else.

People are appointed to the Federal bench because they favor big business. The philosophy from the Chicago School of Business gives them excuses to do what they are doing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This one I suppose might ...