Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRight-wing “environmental research” group uses falsified data to justify Utah land grab
Busted: Right-wing environmental research group uses falsified data to justify state land grab
Last week, a well-known conservative think tank, Utahs Sutherland Institute, released a report that claimed state parks are more efficiently managed and more popular than national parks across the West. The report, which was co-written with the right-wing Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), relied almost entirely on state park attendance data to draw its conclusions. The report got major coverage from the Deseret News, complete with a headline claiming States manage public lands for recreation better than feds.
Theres just one problem: Sutherland and PERC used erroneous numbers throughout their report.
The report cited statistics from the National Association of State Park Directors 2014 annual report (you can see the visitation data on page 19). When those numbers made it into the Sutherland report, however, they changed: PERC and Sutherland gave Oregons visitation data to New Mexico, Utahs numbers to Oregon, and Washingtons to Utah. Washington received visitation data from Wisconsina state which wasnt included in the Sutherland/PERC report.
The result of this four-state switcheroo gave Utah, which happens to be the focus of much of PERCs research, a ten-fold increase in annual park attendance35 million instead of 3.5 million. (You can read PERCs original report, complete with bad data on page 35.)
PERC used that erroneous data to invent a metric, state park visits per acre, to bolster its claim that Utah state parks are wildly more popular than national parks or state parks in neighboring Western states (see page 26). By this invented metric, a small city park in just about any town in America would outcompete Americas finest national treasures, like Arches and Grand Canyon National Park.
...........
Last week, a well-known conservative think tank, Utahs Sutherland Institute, released a report that claimed state parks are more efficiently managed and more popular than national parks across the West. The report, which was co-written with the right-wing Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), relied almost entirely on state park attendance data to draw its conclusions. The report got major coverage from the Deseret News, complete with a headline claiming States manage public lands for recreation better than feds.
Theres just one problem: Sutherland and PERC used erroneous numbers throughout their report.
The report cited statistics from the National Association of State Park Directors 2014 annual report (you can see the visitation data on page 19). When those numbers made it into the Sutherland report, however, they changed: PERC and Sutherland gave Oregons visitation data to New Mexico, Utahs numbers to Oregon, and Washingtons to Utah. Washington received visitation data from Wisconsina state which wasnt included in the Sutherland/PERC report.
The result of this four-state switcheroo gave Utah, which happens to be the focus of much of PERCs research, a ten-fold increase in annual park attendance35 million instead of 3.5 million. (You can read PERCs original report, complete with bad data on page 35.)
PERC used that erroneous data to invent a metric, state park visits per acre, to bolster its claim that Utah state parks are wildly more popular than national parks or state parks in neighboring Western states (see page 26). By this invented metric, a small city park in just about any town in America would outcompete Americas finest national treasures, like Arches and Grand Canyon National Park.
...........
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 471 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right-wing “environmental research” group uses falsified data to justify Utah land grab (Original Post)
L. Coyote
Jul 2016
OP
dhill926
(16,347 posts)1. par for the course...
lie, and then hope you don't get caught...
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)2. You nailed it my friend.
This so called Group cranks out all kinds of misleading junk. Isn't Romney's Sons part of this group?
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)3. Great toon: