Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:22 PM Jul 2016

The Dallas police circulated an innocent man's photo to millions after the shootings

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/8/12127374/dallas-shootings-mark-hughes-suspect-innocent

About an hour after shots rang out near the end of a protest over police brutality in Dallas, the beginning of a mass shooting that left five police officers dead and nine people injured, the Dallas Police Department tweeted a photo of "one of our suspects," a black man in a camouflage T-shirt carrying an assault rifle.

His image was retweeted thousands of times and broadcast on live national television within moments.

But the police got it wrong. Almost immediately, several videos showed that the man, Mark Hughes, the brother of one of the protest’s organizers, was walking peacefully with a crowd when the shooting began. He turned in his gun to law enforcement officers shortly afterward.

Although Hughes turned himself in and was released later Thursday night, he said police never apologized. And even after another suspect was killed after a standoff with police, the police department so far hasn’t made clear on Twitter that Hughes was wrongly accused.


23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Dallas police circulated an innocent man's photo to millions after the shootings (Original Post) KamaAina Jul 2016 OP
The local news did a great job covering this last night... snooper2 Jul 2016 #1
So now you know malaise Jul 2016 #2
Has been for a long time KamaAina Jul 2016 #3
Do you see any incongruity sarisataka Jul 2016 #9
Actually, my hope is that this incident will advance gun control because the victims were cops. KamaAina Jul 2016 #12
So you think sarisataka Jul 2016 #14
Well, the Orlando and San Bernardino shooters were people of color, and... KamaAina Jul 2016 #15
Point taken nt sarisataka Jul 2016 #16
Evidently that is so. Hell, I'm white and know that. tonyt53 Jul 2016 #4
I hate all guns malaise Jul 2016 #6
Open carrying while black. MohRokTah Jul 2016 #5
Lots of blacks open carry TeddyR Jul 2016 #7
Lots? LisaL Jul 2016 #22
fog of chaos... they did the right thing. It was, after all, an emergency situation. Seconds count Schema Thing Jul 2016 #8
Questioning him is one thing, MagickMuffin Jul 2016 #10
Well they had to find him before they could question him. Going to the public was by far... Schema Thing Jul 2016 #17
why the hell was he carrying an assault rifle? frankieallen Jul 2016 #11
gun humping POS Skittles Jul 2016 #13
Like the cops did to Richard Jewell in Atlanta after the 1996 Olympic Park bombing there. tblue37 Jul 2016 #18
I hope he seeks appropriate legal counsel HamiltonSwan Jul 2016 #19
Was and still is, since he is still getting death threats. nt tblue37 Jul 2016 #20
You go out on the street with a big old rifle. LisaL Jul 2016 #21
They were in panic mode. Rex Jul 2016 #23
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
1. The local news did a great job covering this last night...
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jul 2016

Interviewed his sister, told everyone they just wanted to talk to him...etc.,

They had a lot of restraint and emphasized he is probably just an innocent bystander. Not sure what the dipshit talking heads on the three clusterfuck national networks were saying when his picture came out.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. Has been for a long time
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jul 2016

Gov. Reagan turned against it as soon as the Black Panthers started doing it.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
9. Do you see any incongruity
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jul 2016

In the hopes that this incident will advance gun control because the shooter was black? That it will be racism, as it was in passing the Mulford Act, causing the advancement of gun control?

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
4. Evidently that is so. Hell, I'm white and know that.
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:34 PM
Jul 2016

But I'm also not so scared of my own shadow that I need to carry a gun around with me.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
7. Lots of blacks open carry
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 04:39 PM
Jul 2016

The issue with this guy (I thought) is that he was carrying a rifle in an area where cops had just been shot with a rifle, so it makes sense that the police wanted to question him. Were there white guys open carrying in the same area who weren't subject to the same?

MagickMuffin

(15,943 posts)
10. Questioning him is one thing,
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 05:00 PM
Jul 2016

however, broadcasting his pic all over the place not so much!

They should have waited to broadcast his pic until an arrest was made. Now people are wanting to kill this family, according to his brother who was interviewed by local CBS affiliate.


Schema Thing

(10,283 posts)
17. Well they had to find him before they could question him. Going to the public was by far...
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 11:06 PM
Jul 2016

...the quickest way to find him.


The media found out much quicker than the chief of police that the man was a protester who'd given his gun to a cop at the onset of violence. But they only found that out because the Chief broadcast his picture in the news conference.


I will say that the media beat that horse waaaaaaaaaay past the time they knew it was a non-issue. Which, essentially, was within about 15 minutes of having broadcast his pic - his brother found reporters on the street and explained the situation to them. The person of interest got in touch with the police shortly thereafter.

tblue37

(65,403 posts)
18. Like the cops did to Richard Jewell in Atlanta after the 1996 Olympic Park bombing there.
Fri Jul 8, 2016, 11:17 PM
Jul 2016

They essentially ruined his life:

Eighty-eight days after the initial news report, U.S. Attorney Kent Alexander issued a statement saying Jewell “is not a target” of the bombing investigation and that the “unusual and intense publicity” surrounding him was “neither designed nor desired by the FBI, and in fact interfered with the investigation.”

The episode led to soul-searching among news organizations about the use of unattributed or anonymously sourced information. Jewell’s name became shorthand for a person accused of wrongdoing in the media based on scanty information <emphasis added>.

In 1997, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno expressed regret over the leak regarding Jewell. “I’m very sorry it happened,” she told reporters. “I think we owe him an apology.”


Apparently the media have forgotten whatever lessons they learned from that incident--just as the rabble rousing right wing politicians and media mouths have forgotten the lesson they (very briefly) took from Timothy McVeigh's bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
21. You go out on the street with a big old rifle.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 12:09 AM
Jul 2016

There is a shooting. Who do thing police are going to suspect?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Dallas police circula...