Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

senseandsensibility

(17,146 posts)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:16 PM Jun 2012

There's a reason only Rachel and Thom Hartmann will touch this meme.....

Romney is a well documented liar, according to them. Of course they back it up with fact after fact.

But from the corporate media? Crickets. They won't defend him because they have no defense, so they just ignore it.

Yet if Dems would take up this mantra, it would be very effective.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's a reason only Rachel and Thom Hartmann will touch this meme..... (Original Post) senseandsensibility Jun 2012 OP
Technically, Rachel is part of the Corporate Media rox63 Jun 2012 #1
So? lunatica Jun 2012 #2
Neither rox63 Jun 2012 #3
Okay (agreed), but I still think senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #5
She deserves a lot of credit for speaking the truth rox63 Jun 2012 #9
By this I hope you mean some of the media (mainly Fox) maddiemom Jun 2012 #14
And it's good to have a Liberal voice on the "Corporate Media" Would you prefer Limbaugh, or crunch60 Jun 2012 #6
Rachel rules! rox63 Jun 2012 #8
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #21
MSMedia is corporate and govt propaganda, watch 'em kill Al-Qaeda #2! just1voice Jun 2012 #4
The MSM never reports the lies of the GOP. McCamy Taylor Jun 2012 #7
Martin Bashir, Ed Schultz and Lawrence ODonnell are also talking about Romney's lies. libinnyandia Jun 2012 #10
Yeah, love them, but why is Ed defending Limbaugh now? senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #16
I don't know why Ed is defending him. It has nothing to do with free speech and Limbaugh is so libinnyandia Jun 2012 #18
ed's fine, we need someone who can talk to the blue veganlush Jun 2012 #20
Love your reply. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #23
thank you veganlush Jun 2012 #24
been putting it on blogforiowa most of this year rurallib Jun 2012 #11
Good on ya, as Hartmann says. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #12
I love Blog for Iowa and Bleeding Heartland. libinnyandia Jun 2012 #19
Hey thanks, I really appreciate the kind words rurallib Jun 2012 #22
Mit is what is called a pathological liar. Dont call me Shirley Jun 2012 #13
Never mind the media - come on Smilo Jun 2012 #15
Well, that was the last sentence of my OP. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #17
David Letterman also bashes Mittens every night. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #25
Dave is awesome senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #26
He's lying right at this moment - he just said that President Obama is anti-trade. jillan Jun 2012 #27
Uh, no, Mittens, he's not anti-trade at all. senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #31
I am fond of quoting Slavoj Zizek on this, and I will do it again and again: Robb Jun 2012 #28
Yikes senseandsensibility Jun 2012 #30
George Bernard Shaw said it. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #33
He's a freakin' liar flamingdem Jun 2012 #29
Andrew Sullivan is all over the meme n/t taught_me_patience Jun 2012 #32

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
2. So?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:36 PM
Jun 2012

Are you implying that somehow that makes her non credible, or that the Corporate media are A-OK?

senseandsensibility

(17,146 posts)
5. Okay (agreed), but I still think
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:50 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Wed Jun 13, 2012, 06:22 PM - Edit history (1)

she deserves credit for speaking out about this. I have my differences with Rachel, but she is committed to the truth.

rox63

(9,464 posts)
9. She deserves a lot of credit for speaking the truth
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 04:44 PM
Jun 2012

on an outlet that is so often used to spread lies and propaganda.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
14. By this I hope you mean some of the media (mainly Fox)
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 06:09 PM
Jun 2012

Most of the rest of the media is just willfully negligent. MSNBC has come closest to honesty. Their reporting is researched and verifiable NOT a left-wing version of Fox.

 

crunch60

(1,412 posts)
6. And it's good to have a Liberal voice on the "Corporate Media" Would you prefer Limbaugh, or
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:59 PM
Jun 2012

perhaps, Hannity, Beck or Bill O'Liely? Rachel is a voice for liberals and I am happy for that.

Response to rox63 (Reply #1)

 

just1voice

(1,362 posts)
4. MSMedia is corporate and govt propaganda, watch 'em kill Al-Qaeda #2!
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 03:46 PM
Jun 2012

Everyone already knows repukes are pure liars, it's why other repukes like them so much, they think lying, cheating and stealing is the way to get ahead.

The MSMedia only cares about how much money they can make exploiting emotional issues real or fake. There is rarely any rational discussion of anything as that is considered boring to them. MSMedia is anti-intellectual at its core. Maddow just spews repuke talking points as a " defacto mouthpiece for conservative agitprop" and as much as I like RT, RT often props up some repuke yapper in some framed debate as if the yapper has anything to offer anyone.

The media plays marketing games and sadly, to most working in the media the marketing is all that matters to them.

senseandsensibility

(17,146 posts)
16. Yeah, love them, but why is Ed defending Limbaugh now?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 06:16 PM
Jun 2012

I'm a big fan, but really....he should just be quiet if he can't support people who are boycotting him.

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
18. I don't know why Ed is defending him. It has nothing to do with free speech and Limbaugh is so
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 06:33 PM
Jun 2012

destructive to this country.

veganlush

(2,049 posts)
20. ed's fine, we need someone who can talk to the blue
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 07:00 PM
Jun 2012

collars too, but he's not the brightest bulb in the room. He doesn't understand boycotting, he thinks it's a free speech issue and it's NOT. Free speech protections means the Government can't contain or control speech. It has nothing to do with people deciding to bring market forces to bear, through free will, in the form of a boycott.

Someone needs to explain the difference to him and others, for example Sarah Palin. It IS NOT a free speech issue. A boycott is just advertising in reverse, done by people with a point of view banding together. When Coke says buy our product instead of Pepsi, they are calling for a boycott in a manner of speaking. Free Speech issues involve the GOVERNMENT attempting to impede speech.

Boycotting Limbaugh is just a matter of members of the free market making their choices. Just like when a vegan shops for food, he's taking into account the costs that aren't reflected on the price sticker (confinement, torture of innocents) and he's voting with his wallet and boycotting cruelty.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
15. Never mind the media - come on
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 06:13 PM
Jun 2012

Dems stop hiding and start shouting and fighting.

We have the GOPT hurling abuse after abuse at the Dems and what do they do about it - cower and hope the GOPT goes away.

Not going to happen Dems - we need all our elected Democrats to get out there and fight or leave alone and lose.

Rhiannon12866

(206,157 posts)
25. David Letterman also bashes Mittens every night.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 03:33 AM
Jun 2012

He uses any excuse to show his clips of Rmoney with his dog on the roof of his car or of his awful singing. But my favorite was his series on Romney's "youthful hijinks," blowing up buildings, etc.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
28. I am fond of quoting Slavoj Zizek on this, and I will do it again and again:
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:05 PM
Jun 2012

"The ultimate show of power on the part of the ruling ideology is to allow what appears to be powerful criticism."

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
33. George Bernard Shaw said it.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 03:06 PM
Jun 2012

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's a reason only Rac...