General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBest farm subsidy idea I've ever heard
A friend of mine who's a pastor in Texas just mentioned this. Replace (some) farm subsidies with direct payments to farm workers.
Farm workers in general do not receive the minimum wage, let alone a living wage. Let's change that. The USDA will pay your workers for you, $15 / hour.
liberal N proud
(60,348 posts)They get subsidies and don't have farm workers.
orwell
(7,776 posts)...hate the "Welfare" state.
Michelle Bachmann comes to mind...
liberal N proud
(60,348 posts)One time I was driving through Iowa and there was a big sign along the road hating on welfare moms. It really set me off, so I found a database of Government Farm subsidies by address or names (can't recall). Turned out the farmer that owned the land where the sign was making 100,000/year on subsidies.
That was also where I learned that my poor cousin and dead uncle were make more than that each.
hunter
(38,338 posts)Downside is that it might discourage automation.
I think all dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, mind-numbing jobs ought to be automated.
If this automation puts people ought of work, then subsidize work that is not dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, and mind numbing.
In any case, people who happen to be unemployable for any reason ought to receive a basic livable income.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Which ones are left, then?
hunter
(38,338 posts)Economic "productivity" as it is now defined is a direct measure of the damage we are doing to earth's natural environment and our own human spirit.
Most of us suffer jobs that do not make the world a better place.
We ought to change that, right?
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)hunter
(38,338 posts)If you could be paid to make the world a better place, what would you do?
Your answer doesn't need to be the same as mine. We might disagree about what makes the world a better place.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)body, and/or mind-numbing, though. And people certainly differ widely on what makes the world a better place.
PatSeg
(47,656 posts)would also be a great idea, so fruits and vegetables weren't a luxury for low income people.
csziggy
(34,139 posts)Back when I first got my farm there were some subsidies devoted to paying land owners to not grow a crop. I believe it was for some things that were in too abundant a supply so rather than buying up surpluses, the government would simply pay the land owners to leave their land fallow. Some pieces of land had not grown any crops for years, but the subsidies kept coming.
Of course, that meant the money didn't circulate the way it would have if something was actually being grown - money for seed, fertilizer, fuel, labor, etc. just wasn't spent they way it would have if a crop were grown, harvested and marketed. Instead money went straight into land owners' pockets and didn't get spread around the community.
I'm not sure if that kind of subsidy is still done. I've never taken a subsidy like that. The only government assistance I accepted on my farm was help building a wildlife pond down in our woods and advice on managing our trees - which was to just let them grow.
Dash Riprock
(55 posts)I looked into this last year for our farm, but since it hadn't grew any crops for over 50 years it didn't qualify.