Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 01:47 PM Aug 2016

Best farm subsidy idea I've ever heard

A friend of mine who's a pastor in Texas just mentioned this. Replace (some) farm subsidies with direct payments to farm workers.

Farm workers in general do not receive the minimum wage, let alone a living wage. Let's change that. The USDA will pay your workers for you, $15 / hour.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Best farm subsidy idea I've ever heard (Original Post) Recursion Aug 2016 OP
The farmers in Iowa will not like that liberal N proud Aug 2016 #1
I wonder how many farm susidy recipients... orwell Aug 2016 #2
All of them liberal N proud Aug 2016 #11
Very interesting... thanks. hunter Aug 2016 #3
"I think all dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, mind-numbing jobs ought to be automated." Brickbat Aug 2016 #4
You've never had a good job? hunter Aug 2016 #5
What would those jobs look like? Brickbat Aug 2016 #6
That's not a question I can answer for anyone else. hunter Aug 2016 #7
Many people find fulfillment in work that others consider dangersous, damaging to the Brickbat Aug 2016 #10
Subsidizing healthy food PatSeg Aug 2016 #8
USDA used to pay some "farmers" to NOT grow crops csziggy Aug 2016 #9
Yes, they still do. Dash Riprock Aug 2016 #12

orwell

(7,776 posts)
2. I wonder how many farm susidy recipients...
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 01:56 PM
Aug 2016

...hate the "Welfare" state.

Michelle Bachmann comes to mind...

liberal N proud

(60,348 posts)
11. All of them
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 03:14 PM
Aug 2016

One time I was driving through Iowa and there was a big sign along the road hating on welfare moms. It really set me off, so I found a database of Government Farm subsidies by address or names (can't recall). Turned out the farmer that owned the land where the sign was making 100,000/year on subsidies.

That was also where I learned that my poor cousin and dead uncle were make more than that each.

hunter

(38,338 posts)
3. Very interesting... thanks.
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:08 PM
Aug 2016

Downside is that it might discourage automation.

I think all dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, mind-numbing jobs ought to be automated.

If this automation puts people ought of work, then subsidize work that is not dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, and mind numbing.

In any case, people who happen to be unemployable for any reason ought to receive a basic livable income.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
4. "I think all dangerous, dirty, body-damaging, mind-numbing jobs ought to be automated."
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:10 PM
Aug 2016

Which ones are left, then?

hunter

(38,338 posts)
5. You've never had a good job?
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:23 PM
Aug 2016

Economic "productivity" as it is now defined is a direct measure of the damage we are doing to earth's natural environment and our own human spirit.

Most of us suffer jobs that do not make the world a better place.

We ought to change that, right?

hunter

(38,338 posts)
7. That's not a question I can answer for anyone else.
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:53 PM
Aug 2016

If you could be paid to make the world a better place, what would you do?

Your answer doesn't need to be the same as mine. We might disagree about what makes the world a better place.



Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
10. Many people find fulfillment in work that others consider dangersous, damaging to the
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:58 PM
Aug 2016

body, and/or mind-numbing, though. And people certainly differ widely on what makes the world a better place.

PatSeg

(47,656 posts)
8. Subsidizing healthy food
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:56 PM
Aug 2016

would also be a great idea, so fruits and vegetables weren't a luxury for low income people.

csziggy

(34,139 posts)
9. USDA used to pay some "farmers" to NOT grow crops
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 02:58 PM
Aug 2016

Back when I first got my farm there were some subsidies devoted to paying land owners to not grow a crop. I believe it was for some things that were in too abundant a supply so rather than buying up surpluses, the government would simply pay the land owners to leave their land fallow. Some pieces of land had not grown any crops for years, but the subsidies kept coming.

Of course, that meant the money didn't circulate the way it would have if something was actually being grown - money for seed, fertilizer, fuel, labor, etc. just wasn't spent they way it would have if a crop were grown, harvested and marketed. Instead money went straight into land owners' pockets and didn't get spread around the community.

I'm not sure if that kind of subsidy is still done. I've never taken a subsidy like that. The only government assistance I accepted on my farm was help building a wildlife pond down in our woods and advice on managing our trees - which was to just let them grow.

Dash Riprock

(55 posts)
12. Yes, they still do.
Tue Aug 2, 2016, 06:44 PM
Aug 2016

I looked into this last year for our farm, but since it hadn't grew any crops for over 50 years it didn't qualify.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Best farm subsidy idea I'...