If the liberal media is so "biased"...?

[kentuck]

Why then, are Hillary Clinton's poll numbers so low when it comes to questions about "honesty and trustworthy"?

In the latest NBC/ WSJ poll, she rated "poorly" with 56% of those polled saying she was not "honest or trustworthy".

Why?

If the "liberal media" was so powerful and so influential, one would think that Hillary would rate very high in the honest and trustworthy category?

Maybe there is some other force at work instead of the "liberal media"? Maybe there is a political propaganda campaign that is very effective at doing what they do?

Obviously, it is too much to ask the American people to use common sense when supplied with conflicting information that does not comport with reality?

[spanone]

1. because there is no liberal bias in the media...imagine if dems had a 'fox'

a network dedicated to promoting only one party

[kentuck]

3. This seems to be the area where Republicans are most deeply brainwashed...

...Even though their side is super adept at persuading certain people that some things are true, but in reality, have no relationship with the truth at all. And they do not see the contradiction in their deeply-held belief.

[bulloney]

2. If the media were so liberally biased, Bush, Cheney, et al would be imprisoned as war criminals.

Reagan wouldn't be so revered as an iconic presidential figure.

I could go on and on.

[liberal N proud]

4. Liberal Media is a Republican projection

When in fact, the media shows more bias favorable to the right. All one has to do is watch any outlet on air, far more republicans on air than Democrats.

[kentuck]

5. Conservatives laugh at the suggestion that there is any other type of media...

other than the "liberal media". Decades of repeating their mantra has taken root and is bearing fruit in the person of Donald Trump.