General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Senators Suck Up to Jamie Dimon, Get Paid for It" ( Graphic of Donations) -- The Nation
Senators Suck Up to Jamie Dimon, Get Paid for It
Senators Suck Up to Jamie Dimon, Get Paid for It
In fifty years, when historians look back upon the current era of unbridled financial sector influence on American governmentunless all historians are by then employed at CitiBankofAmericaChaseOne Institutions of Higher LearningWednesdays hearing of the Senate Banking Committee will be an instructive example of our perverse power structure.
Jamie Dimon, CEO of the JPMorgan Chase, the countrys largest bank, appeared before the committee after a clear screw-up: traders at JPMorgan placed a series of complex bets that resulted in $2 billion in losses and counting.
This should be of great concern to the Senate. Since deposits at JPMorgan Chase are backed by the federal government, risky market gambling could create the need for another massive public bailout of a normally profitable private bank.
But instead, a vast majority of the Senators at Wednesdays hearing repeatedly praised Dimons wisdom and executive acuity while politely soliciting his opinion on how he thought his own bank should be regulated. That shouldn't be too surprising if one examines the bank's political giving--members of the committee received $522,088 of the bank's cash in recent years, with $296,557 going to Democrats and $285,531 to Republicans. (See the graphic above).
More of article at:
http://www.thenation.com/blog/168397/senators-suck-jamie-dimon-get-paid-it
tularetom
(23,664 posts)When Dimond's hubris ultimately pulls JPM over the cliff and the Senate begins discussing yet another gift of taxpayer money to this asshole, it would be revealing to have a copy of this chart to connect names with faces and donations.
They can't be shamed but it may yet be possible to scare the shit out of them.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,844 posts)Must have been bucking for a raise.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)I called to ask why-Surprise! It turns out the chart is factually Incorrect.
Before assuming this chart and the article are factually correct-Please call your Sen/Rep to verify!
They will stop at Nothing to make Dems appear as "bad as pubs"-False Equiv! Their "lies" are inside of every conversation about every issue. We have to stay on our toes to recognize it And Fact Check before wearing ourselves out jumping to conclusions.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)The chart was posted around 10:30 a.m. You managed to get through to Mystery Senator's office in 30 minutes and have a staffer confirm that the chart is "factually Incorrect"? Impressive -- who sez the gubmint is inefficient?! Please set the record straight as to what is "factually correct."
Just as an FYI, this is from The Nation and opensecrets.org, not FUX "News" or Rush Limpballs.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)I don't care the source, Their source may not have accurate info. All I'm saying is we need to verify All sources before jumping to conclusions.
If it turns out my Sen staffer lied to me this morning I'll deal with that too---via voting and sharing what I've learned with friends & family.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)not even his highest contributor. wowser.
Ghost of Huey Long
(322 posts)We have no difficult problem to solve in America, and that is the view of nearly everyone with whom I have discussed the matter here in Washington and elsewhere throughout the United Statesthat we have no very difficult problem to solve.
It is not the difficulty of the problem which we have; it is the fact that the rich people of this countryand by rich people I mean the super-richwill not allow us to solve the problems
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Looks like only Virginia has a Senator who is a high-priced "escort".
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Gold Metal Flake
(13,805 posts)...when I try to look up donations to Merkly on opensecrets.org I am unable to find contributions by JPMorgan Chase. I tried several ways and tabs including the career setting but failed. Am I not doing it correctly?
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00029303&cycle=2012
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Here:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=2012&cid=N00029303&type=I
From what I can see you can go through tabs at top to get PAC/INDUSTRY....etc. But, to get specific information you have to be a subscriber of theirs.
I assume "The Nation" is a subscriber and therefore got the more detailed research posted in Graphic with their article.
Merkley got very little from J.P. Morgan,itself according to the chart posted at "The Nation" although he did get quite a bit from Financial/ Securities interest groups from what I could see from chart at link that I just provided.
Hope that helps.
Gold Metal Flake
(13,805 posts)Did not find JPM. I think being a subscriber might help. Anyways, the sub-thread higher up got me interested in trying out opensecrets. Everyone should give it a test drive with their own searches.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)But, I love to just Google a Big Finance Type in my State...for
"Political Contributions" and see what comes up. There are a couple of sites that show who they, their relatives gave contributions to in the last elections.
It's been helpful locally with our Grand PooBahs who interfere in our State Elections. But, I've tracked down a few folks "Real Estate Magnates" mostly that's fascinating to see who they contribute to.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Thanks KoKo.