Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 10:25 AM Jun 2012

"Senators Suck Up to Jamie Dimon, Get Paid for It" ( Graphic of Donations) -- The Nation

Senators Suck Up to Jamie Dimon, Get Paid for It


Senators Suck Up to Jamie Dimon, Get Paid for It

In fifty years, when historians look back upon the current era of unbridled financial sector influence on American government—unless all historians are by then employed at CitiBankofAmericaChaseOne Institutions of Higher Learning™—Wednesday’s hearing of the Senate Banking Committee will be an instructive example of our perverse power structure.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of the JPMorgan Chase, the country’s largest bank, appeared before the committee after a clear screw-up: traders at JPMorgan placed a series of complex bets that resulted in $2 billion in losses and counting.

This should be of great concern to the Senate. Since deposits at JPMorgan Chase are backed by the federal government, risky market gambling could create the need for another massive public bailout of a normally profitable private bank.

But instead, a vast majority of the Senators at Wednesday’s hearing repeatedly praised Dimon’s wisdom and executive acuity while politely soliciting his opinion on how he thought his own bank should be regulated. That shouldn't be too surprising if one examines the bank's political giving--members of the committee received $522,088 of the bank's cash in recent years, with $296,557 going to Democrats and $285,531 to Republicans. (See the graphic above).

More of article at:

http://www.thenation.com/blog/168397/senators-suck-jamie-dimon-get-paid-it

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. Save that graphic
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:01 AM
Jun 2012

When Dimond's hubris ultimately pulls JPM over the cliff and the Senate begins discussing yet another gift of taxpayer money to this asshole, it would be revealing to have a copy of this chart to connect names with faces and donations.

They can't be shamed but it may yet be possible to scare the shit out of them.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,844 posts)
2. Interesting that DeMint got so little yet was the most obsequious one of the bunch Wednesday.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:03 AM
Jun 2012

Must have been bucking for a raise.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
4. Concerned about my Sen on the chart
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:04 AM
Jun 2012

I called to ask why-Surprise! It turns out the chart is factually Incorrect.

Before assuming this chart and the article are factually correct-Please call your Sen/Rep to verify!
They will stop at Nothing to make Dems appear as "bad as pubs"-False Equiv! Their "lies" are inside of every conversation about every issue. We have to stay on our toes to recognize it And Fact Check before wearing ourselves out jumping to conclusions.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
6. Really, which Senator is that?
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:46 AM
Jun 2012

The chart was posted around 10:30 a.m. You managed to get through to Mystery Senator's office in 30 minutes and have a staffer confirm that the chart is "factually Incorrect"? Impressive -- who sez the gubmint is inefficient?! Please set the record straight as to what is "factually correct."

Just as an FYI, this is from The Nation and opensecrets.org, not FUX "News" or Rush Limpballs.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
8. Sen Merkley
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jun 2012

I don't care the source, Their source may not have accurate info. All I'm saying is we need to verify All sources before jumping to conclusions.

If it turns out my Sen staffer lied to me this morning I'll deal with that too---via voting and sharing what I've learned with friends & family.



nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
5. shameful that the highest paid felater on this list is a Dem -- Warner (VA) with $108,000, and it's
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 11:44 AM
Jun 2012

not even his highest contributor. wowser.

 

Ghost of Huey Long

(322 posts)
7. It is clear then, who they work for, why they can't or won't solve America's problems
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:31 PM
Jun 2012

We have no difficult problem to solve in America, and that is the view of nearly everyone with whom I have discussed the matter here in Washington and elsewhere throughout the United States—that we have no very difficult problem to solve.

It is not the difficulty of the problem which we have; it is the fact that the rich people of this country—and by rich people I mean the super-rich—will not allow us to solve the problems

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
9. Kansas, Nebraska, and New Jersey Senators are the cheapest whores.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 02:07 PM
Jun 2012

Looks like only Virginia has a Senator who is a high-priced "escort".

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
11. Graphic states source is opensecrets.org. But...
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 02:56 PM
Jun 2012

...when I try to look up donations to Merkly on opensecrets.org I am unable to find contributions by JPMorgan Chase. I tried several ways and tabs including the career setting but failed. Am I not doing it correctly?

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00029303&cycle=2012

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
12. Check this page for industry contributions....
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:15 PM
Jun 2012

Here:
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=2012&cid=N00029303&type=I

From what I can see you can go through tabs at top to get PAC/INDUSTRY....etc. But, to get specific information you have to be a subscriber of theirs.

I assume "The Nation" is a subscriber and therefore got the more detailed research posted in Graphic with their article.

Merkley got very little from J.P. Morgan,itself according to the chart posted at "The Nation" although he did get quite a bit from Financial/ Securities interest groups from what I could see from chart at link that I just provided.

Hope that helps.

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
13. I went the route you did, drilling into individual financial companies.
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 03:32 PM
Jun 2012

Did not find JPM. I think being a subscriber might help. Anyways, the sub-thread higher up got me interested in trying out opensecrets. Everyone should give it a test drive with their own searches.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. I don't know if this would work for you...
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 06:20 PM
Jun 2012

But, I love to just Google a Big Finance Type in my State...for
"Political Contributions" and see what comes up. There are a couple of sites that show who they, their relatives gave contributions to in the last elections.

It's been helpful locally with our Grand PooBahs who interfere in our State Elections. But, I've tracked down a few folks "Real Estate Magnates" mostly that's fascinating to see who they contribute to.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Senators Suck Up to...