Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 03:40 PM Aug 2016

Which would you prefer?

A Democratic House and Senate with a Republican in the White House?

Or a Republican House and Senate with a Democrat in the White House?

Would a Democrat Executive with a Democratic Senate be considered the will of the people?

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which would you prefer? (Original Post) kentuck Aug 2016 OP
Gridlock is gridlock Warpy Aug 2016 #1
That is true. kentuck Aug 2016 #2
You bet, unless they manage to eject him for refusing to do his job. Warpy Aug 2016 #3
The people have to decide whether they still want gridlock or not? kentuck Aug 2016 #4
The people generally prefer gridlock Warpy Aug 2016 #5
Obama certainly had a short stay with this majority.. busterbrown Aug 2016 #6
However, it seems to me... kentuck Aug 2016 #7
Goldwater warned us Warpy Aug 2016 #8
Good point. kentuck Aug 2016 #9

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
1. Gridlock is gridlock
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:06 PM
Aug 2016

but I'd rather see a Democratic CiC who was willing to veto the outrageous excesses of right wing Republican legislation. We'd get into fewer wars we can't win along with ending up fewer bad laws. Then there's the Supreme Court to consider.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
2. That is true.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:10 PM
Aug 2016

Even if the Democrats were to win 59 Senate seat majority, Mitch McConnell would still use the 60-vote rule to contest every vote, including those for Supreme Court justices, I would think?

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
3. You bet, unless they manage to eject him for refusing to do his job.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:11 PM
Aug 2016

A Republican majority won't. A Democratic majority will try to find a way.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
4. The people have to decide whether they still want gridlock or not?
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:14 PM
Aug 2016

They must make the Republicans pay if they want our government to work for the people.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
5. The people generally prefer gridlock
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:17 PM
Aug 2016

on the theory that neither party gets to make all the rules.

The 3 branch control during Stupid's misadministration was a fluke.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
6. Obama certainly had a short stay with this majority..
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:23 PM
Aug 2016

Plus we had a host of asshole Dems in Congress..resisting any progressive moves Obama suggested..for that period.. Was it 6 months?

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
7. However, it seems to me...
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:28 PM
Aug 2016

that, in the past, the Party that was elected with a majority of votes in the most recent election, has usually been given some latitude in their political agenda, and that the strategy of blocking everything the opposing majority Party proposes, is mostly a recent development.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
8. Goldwater warned us
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:31 PM
Aug 2016

that when the religious right crazies got a majority, there would be no compromise with them, ever.

That's what has happened. I don't know if people are waking up to this while the country crumbles around them or if they still think in the old patterns of compromise between adversaries resulting in the best legislation. That's what will determine the outcome of the next several election cycles.

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
9. Good point.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:34 PM
Aug 2016

If you point out that Donald Trump is "crazy", his opponents just laugh and say, " but look at the alternative..."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which would you prefer?