Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 04:24 PM Aug 2016

Gene Wilder - Atheist

Sad to see him go. He was suffering from Alzheimer's.

He came out as an atheist at a time when one could be severely ostracized for their non-belief. The man had guts.

In the book Stars of David: Prominent Jews Talk About Being Jewish (by Abigail Pogrebin) Wilder states, "Well, I'm a Jewish-Buddhist-Atheist, I guess." He was Jewish in descent and a Godless Buddhist.[1]

Wilder was the subject of a prolonged interview on "Inside the Actor's Studio." That program was cablecast during Fall of 1998 on Bravo, a US-based cable television network. The instructor-host asked the famous comic actor what heaven is. Wilder responded by saying that he is not sure if heaven exists and immediately added that everyday life can be thought of as heaven.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gene Wilder - Atheist (Original Post) stopbush Aug 2016 OP
Sounds like a pretty good plan to me. OriginalGeek Aug 2016 #1
and... Jeffersons Ghost Aug 2016 #8
lots of brilliant minds are underpaid Younemeen Aug 2016 #21
IMDB says 1995! TexasBushwhacker Aug 2016 #2
Jewish Atheist! mucifer Aug 2016 #3
Not any more. rug Aug 2016 #4
If it makes you feel better edhopper Aug 2016 #5
It is the reality now, isn't it ed? rug Aug 2016 #16
I took your post to say edhopper Aug 2016 #31
I took it as a simple fact pintobean Aug 2016 #33
True. Now he's just dead. REP Aug 2016 #10
Classy. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #13
No, actually I learned that from Hitchens. rug Aug 2016 #18
I know he does Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #22
Those are pixels and words, not the person. rug Aug 2016 #23
Pixels and words aren't the person? Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #25
Er, no. rug Aug 2016 #26
wow, that was fast. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #27
Only six characters rug Aug 2016 #29
You accused me of preaching, so I figured I owed you a little pulpit thumping, so to speak. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #30
HOLY SHIT I'M STILL HERE Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #41
Always. Think about it. rug Aug 2016 #42
You assume I haven't? Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #43
You know, we used to believe in ghosts. Many still do. WestCoastLib Aug 2016 #35
He wasn't interested in having an actual discussion, clearly. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #40
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #14
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #19
And to think I thought you were so happy at jpr. rug Aug 2016 #20
Wow. demmiblue Aug 2016 #24
Not any more. AlbertCat Aug 2016 #34
He would probably laugh edhopper Aug 2016 #6
Yes. Very disrespectful of his wife of the past 25 years, stopbush Aug 2016 #7
Well, there's room for both, if that's what one believes. DawgHouse Aug 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author edhopper Aug 2016 #32
That too REP Aug 2016 #12
Just to set the record straight leftynyc Aug 2016 #15
'Rejoining' with god is one way to explain it REP Aug 2016 #36
It was explained to me leftynyc Aug 2016 #37
3 Jews, 5 opinions :-) REP Aug 2016 #38
Agree leftynyc Aug 2016 #39
I never knew he remarried. Lunabell Aug 2016 #28
I thought they were weird REP Aug 2016 #11
If he was Buddhist, one way of looking at it is to say that all things contain the Buddha nature. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #17

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
1. Sounds like a pretty good plan to me.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 05:11 PM
Aug 2016

He brought joy to the world - However much he got back, he was woefully underpaid.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,196 posts)
2. IMDB says 1995!
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 05:20 PM
Aug 2016

Gutsy for sure. I tried to find it on YouTube. Lot's of other Actor's Studio but not that one.

edhopper

(33,587 posts)
31. I took your post to say
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 08:34 AM
Aug 2016

he isn't an atheist anymore, because he is with God. Not the right reading?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
18. No, actually I learned that from Hitchens.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 07:35 AM
Aug 2016

Do you think he still exists in some fahion, atheist or otherwise?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
22. I know he does
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 07:41 AM
Aug 2016

because I can still read his stuff on the internet.

'course, as drunks go, I've read much more entertaining ones than Hitch.

"do you think he still exists in some fashion"- hmmm. Yeah, in some fashion. Or maybe define exactly what you mean by "he".

But if you're being a jerk to one dead guy because you're still mad at a different dead guy, you might need new hobbies.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
23. Those are pixels and words, not the person.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 07:45 AM
Aug 2016

Atheism is presumably based on reality, in this case stark reality.

Becoming misty-eyed and conveniently ignoring that does not honor the man.

And no, I'm not being a jerk to him. I enjoyed him for decades and my kids grew up with him.

Hitchens on the other hand was a war-mongering jerk, to be mild.

It's time to grow up Warren and practice what you preach.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. Pixels and words aren't the person?
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 07:59 AM
Aug 2016

Okay, what is? Gene Wilder the baby? Christopher Hitchens the adolescent? None of us are even the same person from moment to moment.

I know, Death is spooky black stark nothing, and this is supposed to be the great looming threat which drives us all into the warm embrace of the holy church.

Ignoring the fact that the scenery is made of balsawood and you can see the ropes holding up the angels.

But nothing is "nothing". Certainly not nothing. There's no such thing as nothing. So-called "empty space" is teeming with things popping in and out of existence all the time, borrowing time and matter and energy and probability from the randomness, uncertainty and chaos that is the REAL firmament underlying everything.

It's not that I'm not scared of anything, but I'm certainly not scared of nothing, Rug.

(It also may be completely meaningless to try and speak of what is "outside" existence, because by definition there is no outside, but that's a post for a different day)

Gene Wilder - and Christopher Hitchens to boot- the individual, the ego, the organizational system of molecules holding forth for however many decades against the relentless and always victorious forces of entropy? Gone. But where? Back to the nameless, the Tao, the great mother of the ten thousand things which has no name and can never be created or destroyed. That's not Misty-eyed, that IS the stark reality.

At least, that's what I choose to think this week. You think whatever the fuck you want, holmes. Your head, not mine.

How's that, for "preaching"?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
30. You accused me of preaching, so I figured I owed you a little pulpit thumping, so to speak.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 08:06 AM
Aug 2016

I think it was Jesus who said, "man does not live by McChicken alone"

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
43. You assume I haven't?
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 04:08 PM
Aug 2016

You know, I'm not going to regale you with my pearls of wisdom if you're not even gonna be bothered to pay attention. Sheesh.

I've got people climbing up my mountain in birkenstocks to avail themselves of my very valuable guru man-hours, and I'm giving my shit to you, here, for free. At the very least a "thank you" is in order.

WestCoastLib

(442 posts)
35. You know, we used to believe in ghosts. Many still do.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 12:58 PM
Aug 2016

A ghost, if you believe that thing, is often thought to be the afterimage of a deceased person still in this world.

Technology has left us with the literal afterimages of millions of people long (and more recently) deceased.

So, what is that, if not ghosts?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
40. He wasn't interested in having an actual discussion, clearly.
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:54 AM
Aug 2016

I mean to my mind, there are some real interesting philosophical questions- what are "we" or certainly what distinguishes one of us from any other, if not the things we say, the things we do, the people we influence, love or touch, etc? And by extension, the words and thoughts we leave behind? Thomas Jefferson is with us, I believe, through the documents he wrote and ideas he put down. Van Gogh still talks to us through his paintings. Etc. etc.

And like I said upthread, we are not even necessarily the same person from moment to moment, year to year. As all things do, we change.

So on the flip side, if one does believe in a self or a soul or a point of awareness that exists beyond the temporal or the ego or the individual, beyond names and selves and all that, one that exists above and beyond the transitory, then at its core is that whatever-it-is any different inside of "me" than it is in "you"? Once we strip away the ego and the name and all the things "we" leave behind?

I don't know. Words are clumsy tools for communicating some concepts. But I appreciate your insight on the question, here.

Response to rug (Reply #4)

Response to Post removed (Reply #14)

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
34. Not any more.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 10:03 AM
Aug 2016

Just like you will not be Catholic when you are gone.... just gone.... right?

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
7. Yes. Very disrespectful of his wife of the past 25 years,
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 11:35 PM
Aug 2016

the wife who was by his side through his senior years, and the years of Alzheimer's. What was she, a placeholder?

DawgHouse

(4,019 posts)
9. Well, there's room for both, if that's what one believes.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 11:55 PM
Aug 2016

I have to say, I had so much respect for him on how he supported Gilda during her illness. If there is a heaven, I hope they are there together, laughing.

Response to DawgHouse (Reply #9)

REP

(21,691 posts)
12. That too
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 12:10 AM
Aug 2016

Besides being disrespectful of Jewish beliefs, which do not have a heaven nor hell, it completely disregarded a marriage of 25 years.

Sometimes I wish I did believe in an afterlife.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
15. Just to set the record straight
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 07:28 AM
Aug 2016

While it's true Jews don't believe in heaven or hell (the way it's normally thought of), we do believe in eternal life. Don't ask me what that means, I have no idea.

REP

(21,691 posts)
36. 'Rejoining' with god is one way to explain it
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 01:35 PM
Aug 2016

Becoming part of a whole, not the Afterlife Cocktail Party. 'Hell' is the opposite and oblivion. (Reform; Conservative and Orthodox probably have different interpretations.)

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
37. It was explained to me
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 02:26 PM
Aug 2016

that heaven was being part of the larger "world" and hell was your soul ceasing to exist.

REP

(21,691 posts)
38. 3 Jews, 5 opinions :-)
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 02:30 PM
Aug 2016

Nonetheless, the idea of Wilder and Radner "together again" does show a lack of understanding (at best; at worst, disrespect) for their Jewishness and Wilder's atheism

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
39. Agree
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 03:16 PM
Aug 2016

about both the assumptions about "where" he is and that we often do have more opinions than people in a room with Jews. You should try also having a family of lawyers - they'll change their minds just to keep an argument going. Insane.

REP

(21,691 posts)
11. I thought they were weird
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 12:06 AM
Aug 2016

There is no heaven or hell afterlife in Judaism, and obviously atheists don't hold such beliefs. I was surprised at how many knew so little about Judaism - or knew that Wilder and Radner were Jews.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
17. If he was Buddhist, one way of looking at it is to say that all things contain the Buddha nature.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 07:35 AM
Aug 2016

or to put it another way, at death the illusions of separateness, ego, and the finite dissolve into oneness with all things. So in a way one could say he's "with Gilda" (or, they never were apart) because like her he's everything again, not that 'they' ever truly stopped.

This is of course just my own paltry attempt at putting words around one interpretation, as another Jewish-Buddhist-Atheist. No more or less valid than anyone else's, I guess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gene Wilder - Atheist