General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm scratching my head about this Wells Fargo issue
I appreciate Warren lambasting them but I'm wondering why no charges are being filed? Was this legal to do?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I am not sure if criminal charges will happen. Is it on the law books not to do this? That could be a problem for those wanting charges. The law is always behind on scams.
MANative
(4,112 posts)name without their knowledge or permission is certainly illegal in any state I've ever lived in. WF has paid $185Million in fines, but so far, no criminal charges have been brought against any person, to my knowledge. That's what had Elizabeth Warren so fired up at the hearing today.
(My early career was with United of Omaha - life ins, annuities, and securities. Series 6 licensed. One of my co-workers did exactly this - opened accounts in others' names. He went to jail - Massachusetts.)
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Warren lives for this stuff. Thank goodness for Senators like E Warren
MANative
(4,112 posts)I hope that her influence will only increase with a Clinton win.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)One that is exactly where Warren wants to be.
MANative
(4,112 posts)mulsh
(2,959 posts)Much as I agree she's earned a big promotion she can do way more beneficial things as a Senator than she could ever do in a cabinet post or even on the Supreme Court.
"Justice Elizabeth Warren" has a melodic ring to it.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)MANative
(4,112 posts)That's been a crime for generations.
Delmette
(522 posts)Transferred funds between accounts without the account Iowners authorization. Each of those transactions should be a separate charge of thief.
An account can't be opened without an initial deposit.
gelsdorf
(240 posts)and the banks are not the only ones doing this type of stuff.
The grocery business................YOW!!!
Stinky The Clown
(67,818 posts)gelsdorf
(240 posts)look like little bo peep. Money flows everywhere to 'buy' space.
Sales always must go up. Can't do it without fudging numbers.
There is a reason companies change pack size so much. follow the UPC
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)would have faced State and Federal charges.
They would have had to return the $millions in severence pay.
per CNN Money discussion yesterday
Skittles
(153,185 posts)the gal who oversaw that unit getting over 120 million bucks on departure
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)..to my local Credit Union yesterday.
The $125 mill to the person who lead the scam.
That one just sent it over the edge.
I was going to wait for the 1st of Oct. But that was the final FkU from an over paid hack with a criminal mind, to her clients.
I walked out the door and moved it ALL. So sick of the lack of ethics & decency across the board.
More of GW's "Ownership Society".
Damn!!
Stinky The Clown
(67,818 posts)We can hope they keep turning until these executive type people are actual jail.
malaise
(269,157 posts)They ruined people's lives for self-enrichment.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)run like any other big business with CEO and investor profits above all else. They lobby politics in their favor.
They're not in it for the average person..
If Trump were President the Corporate investor owned businesses would have a free for all. Regulations in fairness would be gone.
malaise
(269,157 posts)steal their money and no one goes to prison?
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)This thing with Wells was going on for 5 Years!
Most people are just left feeling astonished and betrayed.
They made fools out of people.
This is so ugly.
malaise
(269,157 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)We must own the Supreme Court.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)Maybe they opened the account in a current customer's name, then turned off mail notifications and didn't link the fraud account to the others in the Central Information File set-up. Customer may not have even known it was there unless the Audit Department verified it or it accidentally got linked to an online account.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)And subpoena all email records from all of them any any who discussed it get conspiracy charges.
Move up the chain from there, and see how many willingly turn and testify against supervisors who knew or encouraged it.
And keep going up.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)The senior management that ordered & directed the scam will get off scot-free - with bonuses.
Same as it ever was.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)And no, this stuff was not legal.
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)This is America and we take care of our own if they are rich.
Rich executives are allowed illegal behavior without consequences.
It's the American way because if we didn't allow this we wouldn't have the right to call ourselves a democ... uh... I mean... an oligarchy.