Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How did the repugs dominate the online polls?? (Original Post) brettdale Sep 2016 OP
They think that it shows a good reflection.... Historic NY Sep 2016 #1
Easy to do with bots. Cattledog Sep 2016 #2
That is why I never trust online polls MiniMe Sep 2016 #3
Like this: The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2016 #4
The same way Bernie's supporters dominated on line polls. comradebillyboy Sep 2016 #5
Russians sarcasmo Sep 2016 #6
Putin's Trolls and Freepers TheBaculumKing Sep 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #8
Click farms C_U_L8R Sep 2016 #9
Online polls are only a measure of how quickly partisans can swarm them; 4chan is an expert muriel_volestrangler Sep 2016 #10
Actually it's the reverse, I think. 4chan & reddit users ganged up to over-vote for Trump to make Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #11
The only polls that matter is the battleground polls by the end of the week davidn3600 Sep 2016 #12
In past years we've had large lists of online polls to hit Gman Sep 2016 #13
I had a post about that earlier. I think we collectivly decided they were a waste of time. FSogol Sep 2016 #14
I think you are correct Gman Sep 2016 #15

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
1. They think that it shows a good reflection....
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:17 PM
Sep 2016

much like the primaries where cadres of people over and over hit the polls.

MiniMe

(21,718 posts)
3. That is why I never trust online polls
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:18 PM
Sep 2016

Just like some post here and say "DU this poll", the repugs do the same thing on various message boards. They are desperate to make the polls look close.

comradebillyboy

(10,169 posts)
5. The same way Bernie's supporters dominated on line polls.
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:18 PM
Sep 2016

They voted multiple time and encouraged all of their social media contacts to do the same. That's why on line polls have so little meaning.

Response to brettdale (Original post)

C_U_L8R

(45,012 posts)
9. Click farms
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:52 PM
Sep 2016

Sweatshops full of poor folks in places overseas like Russia who get
paid 10¢ an hour slave wages to click and click and click and click for Trump.
He'll probably stiff them as well.

It's all baloney and any self-respecting media organization should
get rid of these easy-abused 'polls' that mislead their audiences.
And for these particular polls, they should investigate where the
IP address are originating from and whether they're being cloaked.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,339 posts)
10. Online polls are only a measure of how quickly partisans can swarm them; 4chan is an expert
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 08:08 PM
Sep 2016

as they showed in a 2009 TIME poll - see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5578923&mesg_id=5580882 (in which candidates could be given poor ratings, so it has some who were outside the desired 4chan list getting loads of votes):

https://musicmachinery.com/2009/04/15/inside-the-precision-hack/

Look at the first letters in the final result - they still spell "marblecake also the game"; and look at the number of votes (rightmost column) - there's a weird jump in total votes at Manny Pacquiao, because he's the candidate that others were most voting up, and 4chan had to vote down the most.

A comment from Time:

For proof of moot's influence on the Web, one need look no further than the TIME 100 poll results. While Filipino boxer Manny Pacquiao got a larger vote total (20,391,818), the runner-up for the title of World's Most Influential Person, Malaysian politician Anwar Ibrahim, received a mere 47 on the influence scale. Moot denies knowing about any concerted plan by his followers to influence the poll, though TIME.com's technical team did detect and extinguish several attempts to hack the vote.

Undoubtedly, many people will question moot's worthiness of the title World's Most Influential Person. TIME.com managing editor Josh Tyrangiel says moot is no less deserving than previous title holders like Nintendo video-game designer Shigeru Miyamoto (2007) and Korean pop star Rain (2006). "I would remind anyone who doubts the results that this is an Internet poll," he says. "Doubting the results is kind of the point."


http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1894028,00.html

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5578923&mesg_id=5580882

Online polls are an invitation for hacking. If people think they'll get reported as 'news', it's almost inevitable they will be.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,027 posts)
11. Actually it's the reverse, I think. 4chan & reddit users ganged up to over-vote for Trump to make
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 08:34 PM
Sep 2016

I read that 4chan and reddit users combined to make the polls look ridiculous so that Trump would look like a fool.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
12. The only polls that matter is the battleground polls by the end of the week
Tue Sep 27, 2016, 08:56 PM
Sep 2016

What pundits say on TV and what online polls show right now is meaningless.

The real judge of this debate is the American people. And their verdict will reflect in the polls within the next week.

You never know for sure how it was received by the greater population.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How did the repugs domina...