Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 10:21 AM Sep 2016

Out of deference for Chelsea . . He protected her delicate feelings..

Like she's not a grown woman with kids of her own.

She could SO bait him. She could make him rate her on a scale of 1 - 10.

You KNOW he would be contemptuous.. But he'd have no choice but to "hit back". Would that not be devastating?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Out of deference for Chelsea . . He protected her delicate feelings.. (Original Post) annabanana Sep 2016 OP
Or she can stay on the high side of the debate BSdetect Sep 2016 #1
just playing around here, but you annabanana Sep 2016 #4
I agree Jeffersons Ghost Sep 2016 #9
Please remove this jehop61 Sep 2016 #2
kind of the point. . . n/t annabanana Sep 2016 #3
I believe jehop61 Sep 2016 #6
This is not helpful at all. Let's not get in the gutter with Donald. n/t Avalux Sep 2016 #5
huh ? JI7 Sep 2016 #7
Or she could rate HIM on a scale of 1-10. athena Sep 2016 #8
He's full of crap, he doesn't give a darn about anyone's feelings but his own! Raine Sep 2016 #10

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
6. I believe
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 10:29 AM
Sep 2016

he can think up his own deplorable rhetoric without someone on DU suggesting ways to do so.

athena

(4,187 posts)
8. Or she could rate HIM on a scale of 1-10.
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 10:33 AM
Sep 2016

I bet he wouldn't like that.

More seriously, I agree with those who say it's better to go high when he goes low.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Out of deference for Chel...