General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWounded Bear
(58,656 posts)Most laymen and all detractors confuse "theory" with "hypothesis." Much like evolution, GW went past the hypothesis stage many years ago.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)..."A Feeling"
meeksgeek
(1,214 posts)My own brother-in-law believes illness is all in the mind. In spite of this, his house has lots of anti-bacterial soap.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Ahem....
ALL SOAP IS ANTIBACTERIAL!!!
Thank you. We will now return to our regularly scheduled thread
Signed, former microbiologist annoyed at dumb product marketing.
meeksgeek
(1,214 posts)I think my point was that he has fallen for the marketing term while rejecting the science behind it.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)meeksgeek
(1,214 posts)Johonny
(20,851 posts)rurallib
(62,416 posts)We are looking at a near 100 degree day today. Far as I know we have never had 100 in June in Iowa.
Brooklyn Dame
(169 posts)...but even their insurance companies say otherwise!
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/01/2012-republicans-may-not-believe-in-climate-change-but-your-insurance-company-does/
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)The reality of human created climate change will not be accepted by pretty much everyone I've met on the right and even some on the left.
I recently had the joyful experience of being around a large group of local business leaders at play and drunk off their asses. The topic had been aroused by discussing record snowfalls from years past and how it never even comes close anymore. I brought up how the local flora & fauna have been changing with the loss of rainfall, shortened seasons, higher temperatures etc. I mentioned how it was unfortunate we had created this mess and looked to have no plans of not only slowing down, taking a step back and realizing the enormity of what we are accomplishing but charging full steam ahead into assured loss of the landscape we were walking on.
Everything had been fine up to that point. Once I breached that forbidden topic I was apparently slightly blacklisted. I was informed that this was just a cyclical pattern and that in a few years the glorious weather of yesterday would be returning in full regalia.
And that was it. Out of large group of these guys not one broached the possibility it was us possibly contributing to it or even hinted at a defense of my statement. I suppose it would have been a bad career move if they did think for themselves momentarily.
But yeah, hard to accept it for them. I suppose when you have a spent a lifetime of working, investing, expanding, profiting and congratulating yourself for creating the very things now known responsible and causing the coming horrible suffering of billions isn't pleasant. Not when your the man. The mover and shaker. The pillar of the business community who works hard and plays harder and knows his legacy will be that of a hard nosed developer who loved his family and not as an ignorant, selfish man who knowingly squandered the gifts of this world in exchange for a little money.
former9thward
(32,007 posts)It is called "The Law of Gravity". Check any physics book.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)"While laws rarely change, theories change frequently as new evidence is discovered. Instead of being discarded due to new evidence, theories are often revised to include the new evidence in their explanation. The Theory of General Relativity has adapted as new technologies and new evidence have expanded our view of the universe.
So when we are scientifically discussing gravity, we can talk about the law that describes the attraction between two objects, and we can also talk about the theory that describes why the objects attract each other. "
former9thward
(32,007 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)So you can talk about Relativity and how it explains gravity, but talking about gravity being a theory makes no sense.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)After the discovery of Dark Matter and the absence of what should be normal gravity attached to it.. I think pretty much all Scientific "Law" has been abandoned to Theory because so much is yet unknown.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)It is the fact that there must be more matter than we see present in galaxies that has given rise to the belief in dark matter.
Supposedly, galaxies are spinning so fast that they would simply fly apart if not for the presence of so much unseen matter and it's gravitational effect on that galaxy.
Nothing has challenged Relativity. Nothing.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)It hardly makes for good "Law" That pretty much places it back into the theory mode if you ask me...Also when you get into quantum physics, it is a fact a single particle can be in two places at the same time, which puts many questions into the workings of gravity and other known "Laws"...
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)and that led to me using "supposedly".
It is possible that their observations are wrong.
Also, quantum theory has nothing to do with Relativity and "the two slits experiment" results are most probably an unknown product of the particle wave duality that we simply do not understand yet. Assuming that gravity is not a law based on that is irrational. The inverse square rule still applies.