Who the hell is Trump's lawyer?

[underpants]

Sorry for the short OP.

You don't say anything about anything even loosely associated with something that could be a lawsuit.
Even I know that.

He's speaking (trashing really) his accusers? At public rallies? On a P. A. system?

Holy cripes.

Forget the election, we're talking millions in lawsuits and legal expenses ....hold it. His lawyers may know exactly what they're doing.

[irisblue]

1. they must have got the greenbacks upfront

[Hoyt]

2. If Trump pays them, his lawyers might make money. But I don't think he has a case after making

himself a laughingstock of a public figure.

[exboyfil]

8. The poster is saying that the women

may have the potential for a slander suit. He is saying that these women are lying. If they have credible cases a lawyer might want to take that on.

Discovery can be interesting.

[Hoyt]

9. Whoops, responded too quickly. It will be interesting. There will sure be plenty of evidence.

[underpants]

11. He's adding slander on top of th harassment claims or whatever their lawyers can come up with.

[exboyfil]

14. Because of the time involved the harassment

claim on its own probably won't get you into Court. Add to it the slander and now you have potential. In some cases continuing the crime invalidates the statute of limitations. I wonder if the slander can be viewed as continued victimization thus extending the suit to the original act.

[underpants]

15. Okay thanks

I meant to add that Im not a lawyer.

[Cicada]

3. There won't be a lawsuit

Trump may file a claim but he will dismiss it after the election. If he actually went forward he would be asked under penalty of perjury "have you ever touched the breasts, buttocks or vagina of a woman without her consent?". He can't lie because there is probably film of it many places. He just says he will sue to pretend he is innocent. His lawyer who wrote to the New York Times is a powerhouse lawyer who knows Trump would lose.

[lpbk2713]

4. I'm sure he must have several.

He'll need many, considering his past performance and his sleazebag method of doing business.

[SeattleVet]

5. I thought I could make out an additional name on the letterhead...

I think they used some Wite-Out over 'Lionel Hutz', who is obviously their driving force.

Not sure why they would want to hide his participation...

[Skittles]

6. he does not listen to anyone

[underpants]

12. Yeah that's the key

The bubble is strong with this one.

[Hav]

7. We know Trump's lawyer since that "almost lawsuit" against Maher

[img][/img]

[jberryhill]

10. He's not going to sue anyone

[underpants]

13. My comment was about them suing him

Who talks about something like that in public?

[jberryhill]

16. oh, yes, that's exactly how this particular strategy works

If you have a time-barred claim against someone, you make it in public. Then, if you are called a liar, you can sue for defamation.