Email story is NOT what you think

[angrychair]

Why is it wrong?
1) the investigation is not being "re-opened" it never closed

2) it is not about Clinton's email server

3) it is NOT about any emails sent or received by Hillary Clinton.

4) Hillary Clinton is not the focus of this new information or new hardware (external drive?) that has been discovered.

Tweet from Sam Stein:
"Pete Williams sources say in course of a separate investigation, FBI came across "a device." found emails there. but emails NOT from HRC"
https://mobile.twitter.com/samsteinhp/status/792067119286542337

[Foggyhill]

1. It's nothing, so probably was what I tought

Did her assistant married to Reiner have her emails on Clinton's server

Seems these are the emails we are talking about

[angrychair]

2. Not on Clinton's email server

But another device, external hard drive or thumb drive maybe, but it is not about Clinton herself.

[jonno99]

3. Yep - the NYT story is a little vague:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/29/us/politics/fbi-hillary-clinton-email.html?_r=3

[jberryhill]

4. "it is NOT about any emails sent or received by Hillary Clinton"

That's not true.

If they seized Abedin's device during the Weiner investigation, then it probably has emails from Clinton to Abedin on it.

[angrychair]

5. My statement is true

Based on what is publicly being stated right now:

"Pete Williams sources say in course of a separate investigation, FBI came across "a device." found emails there. but emails NOT from HRC"
https://mobile.twitter.com/samsteinhp/status/792067119286542337

[spanone]

6. tell that to the gop and the msm