Reuters national poll Clinton+8

[Proud liberal 80]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/2016_Reuters_Tracking_-_Core_Political_11.03_.16_.pdf

[Tarheel_Dem]

1. I never hear the Reuters polls cited on M$M. Is it because they're usually good for Hillary, or...

are they considered junk polls by the M$M? All I'm hearing lately, day & night, is how "the polls are tightening".

[BlueStreak]

2. A) "The polls are tightening" B) "You need to buy more ads from us."

It is called a business model.

Ask yourself when was there EVER an election cycle when the ad-sellers (aka "the media&quot did NOT claim "the race is tightening." The last one I can remember was 1984 Reagan V. Mondale. And maybe 1996 Clinton V. Dole. One the others ended with the chorus of "Wow, this is some horse race -- buy more ads."

[Tarheel_Dem]

3. I know, I'm a veteran of several horrific election cycles, but this one seems especially dishonest.

The only time Hillary seems to be mentioned is in a negative context. I get that the media needs a horserace, lest people stop tuning in and spending money, but I just want this election over, and hopefully by Thanksgiving, "The Deplorables" will have accepted Dump's loss, and moved on.

[sarcasmo]

4. This poll won't make CNN any money.

[Dem2]

5. Darn, can't click that Republican link

[lindysalsagal]

6. Reuters is usually really accurate. Nice numbers.