General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Trump the reincarnation of Benito Mussolini?
Yeah, I know the usual comparison is between Trump and Adolph Hitler; but, there are more ways that Trump resembles another 20th Century fascist; Benito Mussolini.
Take this article from Salon: Trump's not Hitler, he's Mussolini. How GOP anti-intellectualism created a modern fascist movement in America:
Do a Google search on "Trump Mussolini" or "Trump the Reincarnation of Benito Mussolini" and you'll get hits like this:
DailyKos: Trump the Reincarnation of Mussolini
Eurasiareview.com: Donald Trump The Reincarnation of Benito Mussolini?
dawg
(10,624 posts)to make the trains run on time.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)More Galtieri, Marcos, Somoza, Mubarak, Batista, Pahlavi, Trujillo et cetera.
Trump is more about self enrichment and aggrandizement than world domination.
bench scientist
(1,107 posts)Cosmocat
(14,574 posts)Authoritarian, facist state.
And, it didn't suddenly occur two weeks ago, either.
Long before we chose to make DT our potus, the Rs had congess, a majority of governorships and state housesvand senates.
Trump just was the final step w a full on meglomaniac authiritarian to put the cherry on top.
This is what this country wants, at the very least is willing to accept. It isnt like DT isnt very clearly what ge is and Rs dont very ckearly state the crazy ass shit they would like to do.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Hillary got more votes than Trump.
So in the US, minority rules.
Cosmocat
(14,574 posts)The lunatic shouldn't have gotten a single vote.
60 million or so people willingly voted for him.
And, regardless, as I noted, this country had chosen to give rs congress, control of the states ... etc.
No one put a gun to anyones head to vote Trump or anyone of the 1000s of elected asshole Rs.
Sorry, we are here because this country has chosen to be here.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)God, I can't stand the sight of that hideous, arrogant, smug orange face of his.
eleny
(46,166 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 24, 2016, 06:16 PM - Edit history (1)
Anyway, that's Rula Jebreal's observation in an interview with Don Lemon the other night. Adding that he's like Berlusconi on steroids.
name not needed
(11,660 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,907 posts)He's not going to do shit for infrastructure.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)neverforget
(9,437 posts)...........
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)under Mussolini , for the New York Review of Books in 1995. Actually it describes the Republican party , too.
3. Irrationalism also depends on the cult of action for actions sake. Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation. Therefore culture is suspect insofar as it is identified with critical attitudes. Distrust of the intellectual world has always been a symptom of Ur-Fascism, from Goerings alleged statement (When I hear talk of culture I reach for my gun) to the frequent use of such expressions as degenerate intellectuals, eggheads, effete snobs, universities are a nest of reds. The official Fascist intellectuals were mainly engaged in attacking modern culture and the liberal intelligentsia for having betrayed traditional values.
4. No syncretistic faith can withstand analytical criticism. The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge. For Ur-Fascism, disagreement is treason.
5. Besides, disagreement is a sign of diversity. Ur-Fascism grows up and seeks for consensus by exploiting and exacerbating the natural fear of difference. The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.
6. Ur-Fascism derives from individual or social frustration. That is why one of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups. In our time, when the old proletarians are becoming petty bourgeois (and the lumpen are largely excluded from the political scene), the fascism of tomorrow will find its audience in this new majority.
3. Ur-Fascism is based upon a selective populism, a qualitative populism, one might say. In a democracy, the citizens have individual rights, but the citizens in their entirety have a political impact only from a quantitative point of viewone follows the decisions of the majority. For Ur-Fascism, however, individuals as individuals have no rights, and the People is conceived as a quality, a monolithic entity expressing the Common Will. Since no large quantity of human beings can have a common will, the Leader pretends to be their interpreter. Having lost their power of delegation, citizens do not act; they are only called on to play the role of the People. Thus the People is only a theatrical fiction. To have a good instance of qualitative populism we no longer need the Piazza Venezia in Rome or the Nuremberg Stadium. There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.
Because of its qualitative populism Ur-Fascism must be against rotten parliamentary governments. One of the first sentences uttered by Mussolini in the Italian parliament was I could have transformed this deaf and gloomy place into a bivouac for my maniplesmaniples being a subdivision of the traditional Roman legion. As a matter of fact, he immediately found better housing for his maniples, but a little later he liquidated the parliament. Wherever a politician casts doubt on the legitimacy of a parliament because it no longer represents the Voice of the People, we can smell Ur-Fascism.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/
Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)so maybe yer connection isn't so far fetched.