General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo you think Trump will put Barron in charge of cybersecurity?
-Donald Trump
doc03
(35,346 posts)SS and Medicare.
True!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)He really looks satanic.
doc03
(35,346 posts)older boys Uday and Kusay. Barron looks rather normal for a 10 year old.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I just can't believe this is ok on DU.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)FDT.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)exactly who he reminds me of.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)And who wouldn't be with Orange Godzilla as your dad?
It's the whole rest of the family that creeps the shit out of me. All of them.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Wow, DU is sinking to the level of the freepers now.
Seriously? Calling a 10 year old "satanic", and all the other nonsense in this thread?
If we've let the shitgibbon and his followers turn us into the kind of folks who insult children...wow, they've won.
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)perhaps why Melania is so protective of him, and won't move to WH. And Cheeto being Cheeto, would blame her genes, as his are superior. Didn't you notice how election nite, his eyes followed those released balloons strangely?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But first it needs to be identified and treated. There is also a link between older men fathering children and autism.
Response to jodymarie aimee (Reply #3)
Post removed
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)10 year old child. Make that your mantra today.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)this one is just a mini-Donald Trump and will grow up to be as horrible and evil as his father one day. I don't really see any hope for this boy turning out to be a decent human being. Just because he is young now does not mean that he cannot become a horror in ten or twenty years. Sorry, but I just don't have it in me to give a shit about any spawn of Donald Trump, regardless of their age.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)will grow up as the over privileged child of a hate monger
jehop61
(1,735 posts)He's a child! Turn your hate energy to his father, not this boy. He's hardly being raised by his father anyway. Remember how incensed we were when remarks were made about a 13 year old Chelsea Clinton?
screw them all.
we played by the rules and look what it got us.
So screw them all
over-spoiled brats-the lot of them
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)"Screw them all" a 10 year old kid?
I want to see Trump defeated, but I'm not going to sell my soul doing so, by going after the children.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)I don't think he signed up to be ridiculed.
I mean come on. This is a child.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Relative youth and readiness for an important task are not mutually exclusive.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)I wonder ..
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Alerted for what?
Apostasy?
Iconoclasm?
cwydro
(51,308 posts)In and of itself, it was funny, but the responses are way ugly and beneath who we should be.
No, I didn't alert, but I would imagine that's why someone did.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)It was the responses that devolved into pure nastiness.
sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)A 10 yr old kid that can do anything with computers would be the most qualified person appointed so far for their position.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I made an innocuous joke.
You should be more concerned about the Russian infiltration of our nation's social media.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #27)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)No. Nikita Kruschev would not have been brazen enough to so blatantly try to manipulate an American election.
Neither am I. They are a second world power. What I am "afraid of " is they have a puppet in the White House.
Now that I addressed your response you can address mine.
Do you or do you not approve of the Russian manipulation of our election on behalf of Donald Trump?
Thank you in advance.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #31)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Ummmm, no... Intelligence can be flawed or biased. That is a reason to look at it critically. It is a not a reason to casually discard it. Would you prefer Donald Trump disband our intelligence agencies and get his intelligence from Steve Bannon or Michael Flynn?
Do you believe Donald Trump is telling the truth that there is no Russian hack and that seventeen intelligence agencies and Barack Obama are liars?
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #33)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Putin knows he presides over a second world power that doesn't export anything but gas, doesn't innovate, and basically has nothing going for it and wants to pull the western liberal democracies down to Russia's dismal level. He now has a pal in the White House. Every American, left, right, or center should be outraged.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #35)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Did or did not Putin put his finger on the scale for Donald Trump and if the answer is in the affirmative why would any progressive defend him unless he or she wasn't really a progressive?
Maeve
(42,282 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Intelligence can be flawed or biased. That is a reason to address it critically, not discard it. The consequences of acting in the absence of intelligence (basically gathered information) is unfathomable.
Maeve
(42,282 posts)The kid probably does know more than the old guy about computers!
As for your other point--it will be hard to get the fool to accept information that goes against his perceived self-interest, no matter how much evidence is provided. Belief seems to trump truth too often.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Cui bono? Who benefits by denying Russia is behind the hacks? Hillary will never be president so confirming the hacks will never be of the same benefit to her that denying the hacks is of benefit to Trump because it makes him look like a puppet.
Trump's argument that the intelligence agencies lied/were mistaken about WMDs is self serving and dangerous. What happens when there is real intelligence something bad is afoot and he needs to share it with the nation or the world. If something doesn't redound to his benefit it's useless to him.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)You people should be ashamed of yourselves for this shit. People that insulted the Obama kids were rightly ridiculed, laughed at, and viewed as buffoons. Welcome to that club.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I am disappointed you would call fellow denizens of this board "buffoons".
JenniferJuniper
(4,512 posts)the OP "ridiculed, laughed at" or portrayed Barron as a "buffoon".
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Trump went on about Barron's computer prowess:
-Donald Trump
I just made a riff on it.
BTW, read it closely. The poster you are referring to is calling those commenting in this thread and the OP "buffoons.".