Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 12:33 PM Jan 2017

'New York Times' Reporter Shares Picture of Joe Scarborough at Trump's NYE Party

by Alex Griswold | 11:20 am, January 2nd, 2017

The feud between MSNBC Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough and other reporters flared up again Monday when a picture of Scarborough attending Donald Trump‘s New Year’s Eve party was posted to Twitter.

Scarborough took exception Sunday when incoming New York Times reporter Sopan Deb tweeted that he had “partied” with Trump. Scarborough insisted in a lengthy tweetstorm that he had only stopped by Trump’s party in street clothes so he could discuss a possible interview. The argument angered Scarborough enough that he even brought it up on the show Monday.

The debate took on an interesting turn Monday when Deb’s colleague Maggie Haberman tweeted pictures of the event sent to her by an attendee, including one of Scarborough and his co-host Mika Brzezinski.

Maggie Haberman
‏@maggieNYT

More

David Martosko
‏@dmartosko 49m49 minutes ago

@maggieNYT Was this taken outside? Pity we can't see if Joe was indeed in street clothes
3 replies 3 retweets 13 likes
Reply 3 Retweet 3
Like 13

Maggie Haberman
@maggieNYT 46m46 minutes ago
@dmartosko attendee said poolside. Also said they weren't in formal wear and they left v early.
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes


-snip-
http://www.mediaite.com/online/new-york-times-reporter-shares-picture-of-joe-scarborough-at-trumps-nye-party/
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'New York Times' Reporter Shares Picture of Joe Scarborough at Trump's NYE Party (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2017 OP
The proof is in the pudding True Dough Jan 2017 #1
nitpick time HuskyOffset Jan 2017 #17
That is the original... True Dough Jan 2017 #21
I suppose I should let it go HuskyOffset Jan 2017 #29
Yes, thanks for explaining the obvious. Demit Jan 2017 #33
You can't eat your cake and have it too oberliner Jan 2017 #26
I agree with you. It's the only way the expression spooky3 Jan 2017 #30
so, did joe have to pay the cover charge or did they let him in free? spanone Jan 2017 #2
nah - whores get in free - (oh sorry, was that rude?!) n/t Locrian Jan 2017 #3
Nothing rude about factual statements. Volaris Jan 2017 #4
lol.. he was a little peeved this morning with the coverage uponit7771 Jan 2017 #6
YES! That was rude to whores everywhere! malchickiwick Jan 2017 #18
k and r. nt cwydro Jan 2017 #5
Fucking collaborators Generator Jan 2017 #7
this is a surprise? dembotoz Jan 2017 #8
Morning Jerk flamingdem Jan 2017 #9
Mind if I use that? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2017 #28
Scarborough is a fucking pimp for Trump. Nothing more. Paladin Jan 2017 #10
New Year's Eve, a Saturday, after 5pm (it's dark out) seems like a perfectly legitimate time SticksnStones Jan 2017 #11
Joe, the real question is did you sample from the buffet? If so, you owe the LuckyLib Jan 2017 #22
My prediction for 2017... SticksnStones Jan 2017 #23
Caption Joe gratuitous Jan 2017 #12
"I didn't dress for it"? Isn't that like "I didn't inhale"? lostnfound Jan 2017 #13
Great disguise. He looks like a dork. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2017 #14
Graphic evidence that Lying Sack of Shit is, indeed, Lying Sack of Shit hatrack Jan 2017 #15
Piece of shit MFM008 Jan 2017 #16
It gets better Botany Jan 2017 #19
Is that Meeky Mika in the group? SMDH mfcorey1 Jan 2017 #20
Ahhhh, yess. Dead Intern Joe. Bohunk68 Jan 2017 #24
Joe Blow.....ing the guy who's blowing Putin basement demon Jan 2017 #25
call me harsh if you must DonCoquixote Jan 2017 #27
Wish I could rec this post malaise Jan 2017 #32
Lucikly it wasn't a shot of him with a lip-lock on rRumps butt. CentralMass Jan 2017 #31
Joe just happened to have a tux handy. Rustyeye77 Jan 2017 #34

HuskyOffset

(889 posts)
17. nitpick time
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 02:48 PM
Jan 2017

Sorry, but it bothers me when people get this wrong. It's not "the proof is in the pudding", but rather "the proof of the pudding is in the eating".

True Dough

(17,312 posts)
21. That is the original...
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:19 PM
Jan 2017

but: "The idiom is usually stated the proof is in the pudding and means that the end result is the mark of the success or failure of one’s efforts or planning. The phrase may also be used in the past and future tenses: the proof will be/was in the pudding."

http://grammarist.com/usage/proof-is-in-the-pudding/


Sometimes you just have to let go. Time to move on!

HuskyOffset

(889 posts)
29. I suppose I should let it go
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:10 PM
Jan 2017

but this is how dumb people mess up our language, similar to how, because stupid people use the word "literally" to mean the exact opposite, "literally" now also means "not literally". Thanks much, stupid people. Appreciate it. Literally.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
33. Yes, thanks for explaining the obvious.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:34 PM
Jan 2017

But if you don't eat the pudding the proof just sits there, untested & unexperienced, so you have no idea what it is proving.

You might argue that the way people say it these days is a kind of shorthand, but on the face of it it makes no sense.

spooky3

(34,461 posts)
30. I agree with you. It's the only way the expression
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 04:15 PM
Jan 2017

Makes sense, despite attempts to explain the newer version.

 

Generator

(7,770 posts)
7. Fucking collaborators
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 12:50 PM
Jan 2017

Shaved heads in the future. (hoping for a prime bunker spot no doubt-oh wait he's not intelligent enough to realize Trump can kill him too just like the rest of us) Oh it's hard to not hate these arse lickers.

dembotoz

(16,811 posts)
8. this is a surprise?
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 12:58 PM
Jan 2017

joe is just coming home after wandering in the wilderness

he has always sucked up to the gop.....

Paladin

(28,266 posts)
10. Scarborough is a fucking pimp for Trump. Nothing more.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 01:06 PM
Jan 2017

We've known this all along---but it's nice to get such a vivid confirmation portrait of it. Joe Scar looks like he's ready and able to put his tongue in trump's ear......

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
11. New Year's Eve, a Saturday, after 5pm (it's dark out) seems like a perfectly legitimate time
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 01:07 PM
Jan 2017

To be conducting journalistic business. Yeah, that could happen...at a black tie event. In Florida. Yeah that's legit. He wants an interview with the President. Sure he could phone the request but gosh, he and Mika were in Florida already so why not crash the $500 a plate, black tie event hosted by the president-elect of the United States on New Year's Eve.

Journalists do that ALL the time. What's the big deal?





LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
22. Joe, the real question is did you sample from the buffet? If so, you owe the
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:26 PM
Jan 2017

Trumpster $500.

How gullible does he think people are? Oh . . . wait.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
23. My prediction for 2017...
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:28 PM
Jan 2017


"gullible" will be Merriam-Webster's most used word of the year.

Just sayin' ~

lostnfound

(16,186 posts)
13. "I didn't dress for it"? Isn't that like "I didn't inhale"?
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 01:13 PM
Jan 2017

What difference does that make?

(No offense to Bill.. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of "not in formal wear".)

Botany

(70,532 posts)
19. It gets better
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:04 PM
Jan 2017

Joe Scarborough ‏@JoeNBC 2h2 hours ago
Joe Scarborough Retweeted Andy Ostroy
Uh, no. I'm in street clothes obstructed by "a tall wine glass".

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
27. call me harsh if you must
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 03:53 PM
Jan 2017

But if there is any justice in this world, or if it is possible to make justice come into this world, there will be a time when Mika and Joe Scab are given the same title that those who helped the Nazis come in the power have to bear: "collaborator." Granted many of the people who helped the French Nazi regime a.k.a. "Vichy" were never brought to true justice. Indeed Paris chief of police, someone who had sent several thousand Jews to their death was not punished, and he proudly said "I regret nothing!" Indeed as much as we Americans like to think of ourselves as some sort of backward cousin to European sophistication, the truth is Putin has tapped into that frustrated imperialist in the European and European American mind. Of course, Lenin is spinning in his tomb thinking that the voice of right wing fascism is a former KGB agent.

All the same, this time if Western civilization is to have any credibility, we will need to name names and shame people on the pillory. Joe, Mika and for that matter the vast majority of MSNBC needs to have their space on the pillory. Yes I might not even spare Rachel Maddow, because your response to the fractures that the Democratic Party were suffering to to the sheer arrogant, incompetence of certain people who are running the campaign was nothing more than an ostrich sticking her head in the sand.

But to people who aggressively championed Trump, they need their spot on the pillory, and if they whine we will tell them "the only reason we did not wheel out the guillotine is because we do not want to give you the honor of becoming martyrs, that and we also want to make a stance against the use of the death penalty."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'New York Times' Reporter...