Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

charlyvi

(6,537 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 03:14 PM Jan 2017

Republicans introduce measure to make it easier to give away federal lands for free

Whatever you might say about the new Republican-controlled Congress, you can't say they don't wear their priorities on their sleeves. Their very first act was an attempt to gut the Office of Congressional Ethics. Then, in the wake of Democrats publicly shaming them on the House floor for their inaction on gun violence, they instituted a new rule barring members from taking photos. And a third Day One Republican provision?

Selling America's public lands on the cheap.

Under current Congressional Budget Office accounting rules, any transfer of federal land that generates revenue for the U.S. Treasury — whether through energy extraction, logging, grazing or other activities — has a cost. If lawmakers wanted to give land generating receipts to a given state, local government or tribe, they would have to account for that loss in expected cash flow. If the federal government conveys land where there is no economic activity, such as wilderness, there is no estimated cost associated with it.
The new Republican provision simply ends that. Now if the Republican Party wants to sell, say, all of the federally-owned land in Utah to the state (so that the state could pass it all along to whichever mining companies gave the biggest political donations), the new rule forbids the office from pointing out how much revenue the United States will lose from doing it. It is, literally, a giveaway.

Rep. Raul Grijalva (Ariz.), the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee, sent a letter Tuesday to fellow Democrats urging them to oppose the rules package on the basis of that proposal.
“The House Republican plan to give away America’s public lands for free is outrageous and absurd,” Grijalva said in a statement. “This proposed rule change would make it easier to implement this plan by allowing the Congress to give away every single piece of property we own, for free, and pretend we have lost nothing of any value. Not only is this fiscally irresponsible, but it is also a flagrant attack on places and resources valued and beloved by the American people.”

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/4/1616768/-Republicans-introduce-measure-to-make-it-easier-to-give-away-federal-lands-for-free


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans introduce measure to make it easier to give away federal lands for free (Original Post) charlyvi Jan 2017 OP
Welfare states. HassleCat Jan 2017 #1
And this is what I was most afraid of Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #2
Can't wait to eat my Big Mac charlyvi Jan 2017 #5
So they love Putin, Assange, and Cliven Bundy underpants Jan 2017 #3
K & R Scurrilous Jan 2017 #4
Teddy Roosevelt is crying MiniMe Jan 2017 #6
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. Welfare states.
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 03:18 PM
Jan 2017

The western states exist because of federal welfare programs such as irrigation, mining, logging, etc.

Freethinker65

(10,024 posts)
2. And this is what I was most afraid of
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 03:22 PM
Jan 2017

Once public owned resources are given away, sold, or privatized, the public will never get them back. It is out and out theft.
It was a given that social policies would be gutted, which is extremely upsetting, but the policies can eventually be reinstated.

charlyvi

(6,537 posts)
5. Can't wait to eat my Big Mac
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 04:12 PM
Jan 2017

while sitting in a booth at McDonalds watching Old Faithful go off. After paying a FORTUNE to get in Yellowstone. Just like sports events....they've been priced out of reach for most folks to take their families to see them.

underpants

(182,830 posts)
3. So they love Putin, Assange, and Cliven Bundy
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 03:26 PM
Jan 2017

of course this has the Koch Brothers written all over it too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans introduce mea...