Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Killing The Filibuster Changed The Way Trump Is Filling His Cabinet
There's very little Democrats can do to kneecap President-elect Donald Trump's Cabinet picks as confirmation hearings kick into gear later this monthand Trump knows it.
His will be the first Cabinet sworn in since Democrats went nuclear in 2013 and did away with the filibuster, which used to require 60 votes for confirmation of most presidential nominees. That change may have fundamentally changed the way the Cabinet nomination process is working, and congressional experts say the loss of the filibuster even may have influenced Trump's selection of nominees.
"For a typical president, knowing that there is at least that risk of a filibuster ...would have at least something of a tempering effect on who you nominate," Eric Schickler, a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley, told TPM. "What we're seeing with Trump, he's obviously chosen to nominate some people who are pretty far out there and his ability to succeed with that is higher in a world without the filibuster."
~~~
In the past, holding up Cabinet nominees with a filibuster had always been a rare occurrence. If nominees were blocked, it was usually because their nominations were pulled before senators could filibuster them from the floor. Now, with that leverage gone, Republican senators, Trump's transition team and the nominees themselves may be less inclined to accommodate requests from Democratic senators and undergo the kind of intense vetting that has become the hallmark of the confirmation process. Democrats already are bemoaning resistance from some of Trump's nominees to turn over tax returns and complete questionnaires.
more ~~~ http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/how-killing-the-fillibuster-changed-the-way-trump-is-filling-his-cabinet
His will be the first Cabinet sworn in since Democrats went nuclear in 2013 and did away with the filibuster, which used to require 60 votes for confirmation of most presidential nominees. That change may have fundamentally changed the way the Cabinet nomination process is working, and congressional experts say the loss of the filibuster even may have influenced Trump's selection of nominees.
"For a typical president, knowing that there is at least that risk of a filibuster ...would have at least something of a tempering effect on who you nominate," Eric Schickler, a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley, told TPM. "What we're seeing with Trump, he's obviously chosen to nominate some people who are pretty far out there and his ability to succeed with that is higher in a world without the filibuster."
~~~
In the past, holding up Cabinet nominees with a filibuster had always been a rare occurrence. If nominees were blocked, it was usually because their nominations were pulled before senators could filibuster them from the floor. Now, with that leverage gone, Republican senators, Trump's transition team and the nominees themselves may be less inclined to accommodate requests from Democratic senators and undergo the kind of intense vetting that has become the hallmark of the confirmation process. Democrats already are bemoaning resistance from some of Trump's nominees to turn over tax returns and complete questionnaires.
more ~~~ http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/how-killing-the-fillibuster-changed-the-way-trump-is-filling-his-cabinet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2023 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Killing The Filibuster Changed The Way Trump Is Filling His Cabinet (Original Post)
progressoid
Jan 2017
OP
they only want the power and do not care about anything else ........ unless it is money
Angry Dragon
Jan 2017
#6
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)1. They all have a lot of Evil to hide...............
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)2. Although bad, the 100 vacant judges seats are even more concerning
Trump will breeze through confirmation hearings for judges and most of his cabinet. I think maybe the Secretary of State may fail due to some repugs voting against him. Now the attorney general is a toss up because he's in the senate. It will be interesting to see how democratic senators and repug senators deal with him.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)3. the seats are vacant because the repubs refused to do their job
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)5. True but suddenly the job is going to be done
It sucks they have all 3 branches because no stopping. And only 50 votes needed. Ugh!
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)6. they only want the power and do not care about anything else ........ unless it is money
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)7. Do you sense taunting from the post you responded to?
I do.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)8. I did not feel a taunt
4Tone
(49 posts)4. Republicans won't be ruling forever. Sure, Trump being the first GOP President to benefit stinks
but it's not as if future Democratic Presidents won't enjoy the same leeway with their picks.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)9. That is, until the GOP changes more rules to their benefit
They are dirty fighters and always find a way to stack the deck in their favor. They are not going to concede or give up power under any circumstances. I see very few of them going quietly into the night - ever.
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)10. That is why I think that they will keep the SCOTUS rules as is