How is it possible-if intel reports are true-to count 2016 Presidential election as unsullied?
David Remnick: One should continue to demand even more information from the U.S. government, and one can readily concede that Trump won his Electoral College victory for a variety of reasons, including the disaffection of the white working class in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio; the F.B.I. directors two letters, late in the campaign, about Clintons e-mail server; and Clintons deficiencies and tactical errors as a candidate.
And yet how is it possible, if these intelligence reports are true, to count the 2016 Presidential election as unsullied? We are two weeks away from Trumps Inauguration, and American intelligence agencies, flawed as they are, have declared, publicly and clearly, that they have convincing evidence that Russia, at its Presidents direction, interfered in a Presidential election.
Good:
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/trump-putin-and-the-big-hack