Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 11:52 AM Jan 2017

"Public Health" Argument for Universal Healthcare

What I haven't heard more of during the debate over preserving/repealing PPACA and one that should almost certainly be at the top of the list of reasons for not only preserving PPACA but also eventually expanding it to ensure universal health care is ensuring the most effective management of outbreaks of diseases with the potential to quickly kill large amounts of people. This is something that I would think that this would be even more important given our recent experience with Ebola in this country which, thankfully, wasn't as bad as it could have been. Come to think of it, this is also a great argument for reforming our nation's labor laws governing sick time and usage thereof. All too often it seems that people try to "tough it out" and don't go to the doctor when sick and, what's even worse is that they usually end up having to go into work anyway despite being ill because their jobs don't allow them to be sick without the very real possibility of them being terminated (which everybody in their right mind, of course, seeks to avoid). IMHO we need to ensure that people, when sick, can take the time off that they need and, most importantly, have access to treatment if needed, to quickly recover and avoid spreading illnesses around. The ability to stop the spread of a communicable fatal disease may rest on the ability of healthcare workers to diagnose and isolate infected individuals, some of whom simply may not seek treatment if they don't have access to health care and they may wind up spreading the disease to others by showing up at work- because they have to in order to keep their jobs.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Public Health" Argument for Universal Healthcare (Original Post) Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2017 OP
I always wondered why GOP thinks it's a good idea for people with contagious diseases SharonAnn Jan 2017 #1
This has always perplexed me too Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2017 #3
They only want white families to have healthcare libtodeath Jan 2017 #2
But "Captain Trips" won't discriminate Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2017 #4
They will get care and the riff raff can just die. libtodeath Jan 2017 #5
RIP equals Republican Insurance Plan n/t MindPilot Jan 2017 #7
This is one of the two most reasonable "selling points" for single payer. MindPilot Jan 2017 #6
Yup Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2017 #8
I've had this discussion with so many. MindPilot Jan 2017 #12
Great post. nt raccoon Jan 2017 #13
People are not worried enough about this sort of thing treestar Jan 2017 #9
Yup Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2017 #10
Yes. Are you old enough to remember treestar Jan 2017 #11

SharonAnn

(13,775 posts)
1. I always wondered why GOP thinks it's a good idea for people with contagious diseases
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:18 PM
Jan 2017

to go untreated and be out there spreading contagion. And, since many of them are in low wage jobs like restaurant, retail, and hospitality services, they have contact with hundreds of people a day.

Way to spread a contagious disease!

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
3. This has always perplexed me too
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:25 PM
Jan 2017

Guess you can say they are "pro-disease spreading", at least until they or somebody they care about gets something like Ebola or worse.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
4. But "Captain Trips" won't discriminate
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:26 PM
Jan 2017

And all of the money and medical technology may not be able to save them once it afflicts them or theirs. As per usual, they are short-sighted.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
6. This is one of the two most reasonable "selling points" for single payer.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:33 PM
Jan 2017

1. A healthy population is a public good, just like a strong military, or a safe air traffic control system.

2. Single payer would shift billions in health costs from business to the taxpayer. Never quite understood how conservatives are not all over that idea.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
8. Yup
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:38 PM
Jan 2017

I guess that the GOP thinks everything is ok as long as at least a few people in this country are "strong" enough to defend it should somebody try to actually invade us. I didn't think about #2 but, yeah, why wouldn't that make them happy? But then again, they've demonized taxes so much that people tend to respond pretty reflexively whenever you get to the discussion of how SP will actually be paid for. Years and years of deprogramming about taxes alone are probably going to be necessary to condition people to accept SP.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
12. I've had this discussion with so many.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 02:08 PM
Jan 2017

They begin always with "well I shouldn't have to pay for some one else's bad choices."

You already do...all the time every day. When that drunk drove the wrong way on the freeway, you helped pay for that; when the old lady down the block fell asleep with a cigarette in her hand, you helped pay for that. It is how taxes and insurance work in a tight-knit technological society.

You also already help pay for everyone's healthcare every time you pay a premium or a co-pay, and you are paying for the most expensive healthcare possible--he ER--for those who don't have any means to pay.

So would you like to manage costs by consolidating expenses, or would you prefer to be stepping over dying bodies in the streets? Those are your choices.

I so wish those simple truths had been presented when the whole healthcare debate was going on.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
9. People are not worried enough about this sort of thing
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:41 PM
Jan 2017

The eradication of most of the contagious diseases, or near eradication, makes them complacent.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
10. Yup
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 01:53 PM
Jan 2017

but that doesn't mean that new really bad things won't show up in the future, of course. Or what about people (eventually) traveling to Mars or other planets? Who knows what THEY might return with (but I don't know how much we have to worry about that since the Republicans don't believe much in Science programs anyway......)

treestar

(82,383 posts)
11. Yes. Are you old enough to remember
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 02:04 PM
Jan 2017

when the Astronauts came back from the moon. They were quarantined for a while to make sure there was no spooky type of disease!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Public Health" Argument ...