Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:44 PM Jan 2017

Joy Reid Delivered Huge Ratings for MSNBC, So They Chose the Fox Reject

?1484094041

DailyKos

If you were waiting for a daily news program featuring a lightweight, partisan hack with absolutely no charisma, then MSNBC really came through for you Monday night.

Greta Van Susteren’s “For the Record” debuted—not to be confused with the Fox show she no longer has--“On the Record”. Despite the preposition change, Van Susteren’s show was pretty much indistinguishable from her old show on Fox. A softball question followed by an occasional harder one that she allowed the guest to evade. I really don’t understand CEO Phillip Griffin’s reasoning for hiring her: she had low ratings with a conservative audience at Fox—does he think she’ll find more conservatives over at MSNBC?

As stupid as that sounds, NBC honchos seem to be doubling down on that strategy. Greta joins Morning Joe, Chris Mathews, and more recently, Megyn “Don’t Worry Kids, Santa isn’t White” Kelly. Pretty good lineup for the demographic of people who are too stupid to realize they aren’t watching Fox.

On the other hand, Joy-Ann Reid is a real hard-hitting journalist who doesn’t know what a softball question is. She is smart, quick on her feet, and can be a pitbull when a guest tries to evade her. She’s also given MSNBC some of their highest numbers in over a decade:

Airing on the weekends from 10 a.m. – 12 p.m., AM Joy delivered the time period’s biggest total viewer audience since the 1st quarter of 2003 and biggest A25-54 audience since Q4 2012.

Despite a crushing election, this nation leans left. Trump was beaten in the popular vote by 3 million votes, and Democrats won the majority of votes in the Senate and House as well. If ratings were based on arcane rules or gerrymandering like our national elections, then yes, MSNBC’s strategy would make sense. But they aren’t. Ratings are actually based on popular opinion. There is a huge market for the American progressive audience---one, I might add, that is not currently being filled.

Instead of trying to peel a few of the age 80+, angry, white racists from Fox, MSNBC could be making a play for the large 25-54 audience who think Trump needs his feet held to the fire over hard-fought programs, civil rights... and just plain civility.

Ironically, MSNBC was in the prime position for this market, and they already had the voice. Joy was already on the payroll, scored big in ratings, and Griffin could have hired her for a fraction of the bloated salary given to Van Susteren.
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joy Reid Delivered Huge Ratings for MSNBC, So They Chose the Fox Reject (Original Post) Stellar Jan 2017 OP
Sigh... Like being kicked in the onions uponit7771 Jan 2017 #1
I'm personally put off / offended and cilla4progress Jan 2017 #2
Because the corporations- the owners are always in the pocket of Republicons Generator Jan 2017 #3
I really think that's why they got Rachel to vouch for Greta-they could have gave Joy that position. Stellar Jan 2017 #8
Rachel insisted her vouching was of her own volition - based on their friendship. But Greta's chimpymustgo Jan 2017 #12
hear, hear! nt Stellar Jan 2017 #15
I think Rachel Flatpicker Jan 2017 #35
Rachel has become an enigma to me. One night, she gives me hope. The next night, chimpymustgo Jan 2017 #36
Have to disagree. kstewart33 Jan 2017 #50
It's sickening. Joy Reid is probably their best anchor. n/t Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #4
Is it possible Joy didn't want it and turned it down? yeoman6987 Jan 2017 #11
Really????????? chimpymustgo Jan 2017 #13
Doing a daily show instead of a weekend show? It's possible. yeoman6987 Jan 2017 #19
I suppose. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #14
I do love having something to watch radical noodle Jan 2017 #27
Doubtful! She's done full week coverage for both Chris Hayes and Lawrence OD lately ... bettyellen Jan 2017 #30
Old term referencing radio in the 1980s: Ratings Reduction Radio... Eleanors38 Jan 2017 #47
Turn. them. off. nt Maven Jan 2017 #5
Greta has her head up the ass the GOP. Dawson Leery Jan 2017 #6
It's RW world thegoose Jan 2017 #7
That's what I'm talking about! Stellar Jan 2017 #10
I wondered the same thing, too! Rhiannon12866 Jan 2017 #17
TV nets are imploding like radios nets have earlier, so it makes sense... Eleanors38 Jan 2017 #48
But God, I love watching Joy on Sat and Sun mornings... SticksnStones Jan 2017 #9
I was bummed when they took her off in the afternoons Rhiannon12866 Jan 2017 #16
I too like Joy Reid...but at least she does have at least 4 hours of weekly airtime. TrekLuver Jan 2017 #18
So how many hours does 'Morning Joke' get every day- three hours a day-15hr per week? Stellar Jan 2017 #23
I don't watch Morning Joe....but I always (when able) watch Joy Reid so that's 4 more hours TrekLuver Jan 2017 #28
"Broader" for MSM is like searching through a ribbon factory's discards. Eleanors38 Jan 2017 #49
Greta Van who? wildeyed Jan 2017 #20
Joy should get Chuck Toady's time. I think he's worse then Greta Raine Jan 2017 #21
And Greta played stupid and bolstered Trumps attack on CNN too- craven bettyellen Jan 2017 #31
GVS's show is awful, even if one didn't know her background. She won't last long. Hoyt Jan 2017 #22
I agree, if she doesn't improve her show, she'll be gone. One thing NBC chiefs don't have is napi21 Jan 2017 #29
I think Joy can get a better time slot Dem2 Jan 2017 #24
Agree totally with the OP, they're killing their brand MrPurple Jan 2017 #25
I agree, as well. Rhiannon12866 Jan 2017 #38
As Phyllis Diller used to joke, "one more face lift and she'll be sporting a goatee"! George II Jan 2017 #26
Years of shilling for Faux is bad enough spiderpig Jan 2017 #32
Move Joy, Rachel, and Lawrence to CNN Blue Idaho Jan 2017 #33
Great idea! CNN needs some punch, and dump the Republican airhead panelists. ..Waste of time Alice11111 Jan 2017 #39
The panelists at CNN have got to go MrPurple Jan 2017 #41
Exactly, good analogy. Alice11111 Jan 2017 #42
Today's Media Celebrities Blue Idaho Jan 2017 #46
Fuck MSNBC TeamPooka Jan 2017 #34
Great point. I have great admiration for Joy and will make a point of switching stations when Tanuki Jan 2017 #37
Boycott Greta n/t left-of-center2012 Jan 2017 #40
And the country picked a second rate hack over the real deal world wide wally Jan 2017 #43
Phil Donahue was ditched by MSNBC even though his ratings were the network's highest. tblue37 Jan 2017 #44
Yep I remember thatand Olbermann Generator Jan 2017 #51
Don't watch her show at all Thrill Jan 2017 #45
Joy Reid and Greta. No wonder people are turning off network TV LittleBlue Jan 2017 #52
 

Generator

(7,770 posts)
3. Because the corporations- the owners are always in the pocket of Republicons
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:48 PM
Jan 2017

Fuck the little guy-lower taxes. It's always this. I hope their bunker spot is secure or that seat on the mission to the planet they intend to live on. What about their grandchildren? Humanity sucks.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
8. I really think that's why they got Rachel to vouch for Greta-they could have gave Joy that position.
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:55 PM
Jan 2017

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)
12. Rachel insisted her vouching was of her own volition - based on their friendship. But Greta's
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:02 PM
Jan 2017

show, is so far, unwatchable. And I'm offended they would treat one the smartest, best interviewers, hold-their-feet-to-the-fire anchors like this.

I'm sure it doesn't help that she is black. That relegates her to weekends. She's better than Greta - and a bunch of the white folks on during the weekdays and nights. Sigh.

Flatpicker

(894 posts)
35. I think Rachel
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:15 AM
Jan 2017

Needs to come off the air.

She's lost perspective and respect since the 2016 election.
Too much into the horse-race to a point that she made him a legitimate candidate.

MSNBC could go off the air and we wouldn't be missing much anymore.

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)
36. Rachel has become an enigma to me. One night, she gives me hope. The next night,
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:28 AM
Jan 2017

I feel she is betraying us.

When you get the kind of money and power she has, it can take you out of the "in-the-trenches" fight.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
50. Have to disagree.
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 07:23 PM
Jan 2017

Rachel's show breaks news as she did with the Flint water scandal. Her team of researchers are top notch, and MSNBC knows it. Best ratings by far of any show on MSNBC. Sharp as a whip. Gave Conway the toughest time in her interview a few weeks ago.

No way MSNBC would lose her.

Joy's earned a daily program. MSNBC is clearly trying to widen its audience. But it stands to lose loyal viewers if it strays too far. I'm willing to give Greta more time. I've seen only 30 minutes or so of her show, and was concerned about the lack of balance which I think MSNBC is looking for in the daytime schedule. But we'll see.

radical noodle

(8,003 posts)
27. I do love having something to watch
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:29 PM
Jan 2017

on Saturday and Sunday mornings. She's a breath of fresh air compared to MTP and all the other Sunday shows.

The 6 pm slot has always seemed like a dead spot to me. They seem to fill it with odds and ends, and Greta is certainly the end for me.

She often fills in for evening shows when the regular host is off.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
30. Doubtful! She's done full week coverage for both Chris Hayes and Lawrence OD lately ...
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:37 PM
Jan 2017

And then worked the weekends. I have no doubt she would take it gladly. She is too passionate about her work.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
47. Old term referencing radio in the 1980s: Ratings Reduction Radio...
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 07:09 PM
Jan 2017

So-called phenomenon where a radio station (usually an NPR affiliate) intentionally took steps to reduce listenership so as to not threaten commercial stations in the same market, and thereby incurring the wrath of right-wing critics and private networks, esp. around license renewal time. Seemed far-fetched, but term resurrected during the Rush/Clear Channel era when RW owners bought popular stations, paid the going rate, then scheduled vast quantities of RW junk. Ratings dropped, but the markets become increasingly dominated by RW agitprop, even as revenues eventually dropped for these networks. Unclear as to the ultimate aims of these propaganda outlets, and it certainly defies the usual clap trap economic determinism heard in any bar, but the goal of homogenizing a media force was accomplished, even as it runs out of gas.

 

thegoose

(3,115 posts)
7. It's RW world
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:55 PM
Jan 2017

The Pukes have won everything this year, so all the freaks can invade what we'd hoped were our surviving liberal bastions. After Comcast bought NBC (and MSNBC) and shoved the execrable "With All Due Respect" up our asses, we felt vindication when it was cancelled. Alas, our joy was short-lived, because they were only making room for this shrill-voiced Fox reject Greta Van Susterwhatever.

Sadder still are the uber-cheery promos Rachel Maddow makes for this hag. Did they threaten to kill her?

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
10. That's what I'm talking about!
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:58 PM
Jan 2017
Sadder still are the uber-cheery promos Rachel Maddow makes for this hag. Did they threaten to kill her?


And I got dumped on when I said it.
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
48. TV nets are imploding like radios nets have earlier, so it makes sense...
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 07:12 PM
Jan 2017

to assert dominance here as before. Note my #47 above.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
9. But God, I love watching Joy on Sat and Sun mornings...
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:57 PM
Jan 2017

I really look forward to those four weekend hours

Rhiannon12866

(205,527 posts)
16. I was bummed when they took her off in the afternoons
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:05 PM
Jan 2017

But then we've seen her more than ever, back to being a substitute or a panelist on just about every other show - and also weekends in the mornings. She has more than paid her dues. And she always does a stellar job. Tonight I discovered that "Little House on the Prairie" is on another channel at 6.

 

TrekLuver

(2,573 posts)
18. I too like Joy Reid...but at least she does have at least 4 hours of weekly airtime.
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:07 PM
Jan 2017

I guess Greta is a "bigger" name? They are trying to appeal to a "broader" audience? I can't watch her for very long...it's just too painful.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
23. So how many hours does 'Morning Joke' get every day- three hours a day-15hr per week?
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:16 PM
Jan 2017

And he out of there. Joy is the only one that works all around the clock...morning, noon and night.

 

TrekLuver

(2,573 posts)
28. I don't watch Morning Joe....but I always (when able) watch Joy Reid so that's 4 more hours
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:34 PM
Jan 2017

than I watch of that morning Joe crap! I got so excited when I saw her sitting in for Chris Matthews last week LOL. As much as I'd like her on every day I do enjoy those weekends of 2 solid hours. I would also like MSNBC to replay her show right before they switch to Dateline or whatever for the night.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
20. Greta Van who?
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:08 PM
Jan 2017

Truthfully, I gave up on MNBC a while ago. Reid was the only bright spot. Now this Do they think they will out-Fox Fox News?

Raine

(30,540 posts)
21. Joy should get Chuck Toady's time. I think he's worse then Greta
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:10 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Wed Jan 11, 2017, 11:00 PM - Edit history (1)

I was completely repulsed by him today, sickening.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
31. And Greta played stupid and bolstered Trumps attack on CNN too- craven
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:40 PM
Jan 2017

Attempt at stealing viewers?

napi21

(45,806 posts)
29. I agree, if she doesn't improve her show, she'll be gone. One thing NBC chiefs don't have is
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:36 PM
Jan 2017

patience. I do think that Joy could get a better time slot than 6 PM EST.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
24. I think Joy can get a better time slot
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:21 PM
Jan 2017

The assumption that the slot that Greta got was the best one for Joy is an assumption that I'm not willing to make.

MrPurple

(985 posts)
25. Agree totally with the OP, they're killing their brand
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:24 PM
Jan 2017

I remember around 2003 when MSNBC used to have schizophrenic programming and they'd go from Olbermann one hour to Tucker Carlson the next (van Sustern was on CNN back then). They've since established themselves as a unique brand with an intelligent progressive perspective.

I feel like I'm their target audience and I can't sit through much of Greta. It's a business decision and I guess it must make some sense to them. It's an early time slot and maybe it's about grabbing senior viewers.

Rhiannon12866

(205,527 posts)
38. I agree, as well.
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:33 AM
Jan 2017

We generally have MSNBC on most evenings, like all the shows for different reasons, till now. And of course I remember when KO was on. We had a very active forum here that watched it together every night! And I often caught Tucker Carlson, too - if you remember his sidekick: Rachel Maddow!

A belated welcome to DU, MrPurple! And congratulations on 100 posts! It's great to have you with us!

George II

(67,782 posts)
26. As Phyllis Diller used to joke, "one more face lift and she'll be sporting a goatee"!
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:29 PM
Jan 2017

Sorry, but that woman is one of the phoniest of the bunch.

spiderpig

(10,419 posts)
32. Years of shilling for Faux is bad enough
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 10:44 PM
Jan 2017

but knowing she's a Scientologist seals the deal.

Switching to Food Network during her time slot.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
39. Great idea! CNN needs some punch, and dump the Republican airhead panelists. ..Waste of time
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:36 AM
Jan 2017

I like all 3 of them, though upset with RM for carrying water for Repubs. Love Joy...she is focused and keeps her guest on point. Unlike, CM, she doesn't shout in my face or constantly interrupt people who are more knowledgeable than her.

MSNBC Execs not too sharp.
Do they really think the same people who watch RM will watch
Greta Van SEWAGEWATER???!@!??



MrPurple

(985 posts)
41. The panelists at CNN have got to go
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:48 AM
Jan 2017

Having panelists who are outright shills for the candidates is idiotic. It's like watching professional wrestling, but even more predictable.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
42. Exactly, good analogy.
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 01:06 AM
Jan 2017

It doesn't matter whether they are male or female, the Republican panelists are really just bimbo, hostile, predictable professional wrestlers. It's like they are in a fact free zone, and they don't listen to the other panelists, but they just start punching for DT as hard and loudly as possible. It perpetuated this "False Equivalency," that the Repubs deserved equal time... for bimboshit.

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
46. Today's Media Celebrities
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 11:34 AM
Jan 2017

Do a terrible job of riding herd on the propagandists that appear on-air. Even worse - we see the return of the republican "rude guest" trying to filibuster panels and hosts by talking over the top of anyone trying to offer an alternate opinion.

Having said all that - CNNs programming at almost any time of day (and sometimes into the night) is far superior to MSNBCs lineup. Morning Joe, Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd, Greta Von Gish Gallop and their partners in crime are all unwatchable.

Tanuki

(14,919 posts)
37. Great point. I have great admiration for Joy and will make a point of switching stations when
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:32 AM
Jan 2017

Greta's show comes on. I have been switching channels or turning off the TV whenever Kellyanne Gorgon is being interviewed for some time now.

tblue37

(65,408 posts)
44. Phil Donahue was ditched by MSNBC even though his ratings were the network's highest.
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 02:39 AM
Jan 2017

He questioned the drumbeat for the invasion of Iraq, so he was cancelled.

I am surprised they haven't thrown Ms. Reid away yet. I keep my fingers crossed for her continued ability to speak truth to power.

 

Generator

(7,770 posts)
51. Yep I remember thatand Olbermann
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 08:01 PM
Jan 2017

who I know was a reported diva to work with. Still. They don't give a fuck about liberals-only money. It's time to harden up and stop watching propaganda. I have. I refuse to turn any of them on again unless Trump is in chains or there is a natural emergency.

(also Ashley Banfield-anybody smart is ditched-they cut her from CNN too this year-she was very sharp and to the point on Trump enablers when she had the chance)

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
52. Joy Reid and Greta. No wonder people are turning off network TV
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 08:36 PM
Jan 2017

Two dull as dishwater talking heads with nothing interesting to say. Shrug

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joy Reid Delivered Huge R...