General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll of a sudden the fugging M$Greedia hacks are demanding verification
They had all the evidence of Obama's birth in Hawaii and still spread those birther lies. They had no verification of any of the 'crooked Hillary' shit but even repeated the 'crooked Hillary' shit. Not one of them pointed out that Groper Don the Con had no fuckng authority to lock up Hillary and they spread it. GEM$NBComcast even repeated an ad over and over repeating JoeScums lies.
Fuck you fucking fucks!!!
handmade34
(22,756 posts)unblock
(52,253 posts)The right way to go about it is to solicit a foreign government to commit espionage and share the contraband.
malaise
(269,054 posts)Hillary's email - can you believe that shit. Did one M$Greedia hack say this was illegal and interference in the US election?
betsuni
(25,538 posts)Edited to make Trump look good, of course in his own words. Disgusting. When it's Democrats, we're told what they say, not shown them speaking their own words. But of course Trump will answer the butt-kissing ABC reporters' "questions."
malaise
(269,054 posts)Fugg 'em! He will never be legitimate.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)10,000 is not enough
yardwork
(61,650 posts)trusty elf
(7,394 posts)[img][/img]
malaise
(269,054 posts)Long time no see
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)lisvard2
(23 posts)Drumpf to force congress to pass a bill requiring all U.S. citizens to learn the Russian national anthem.
Pass it on!!!
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)mcar
(42,334 posts)As usual, they kowtow to Republicans. Every. Time.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)So obvious they'd take the side of the oligarchs. Those are their peeps.
The myth of the liberal media is one of the most blatant and useful hoaxes the RW Propaganda Ministry has perpetrated.
malaise
(269,054 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)methodology used in that study that supposedly "proved" the existence of liberal media bias. I was sure I'd bookmarked that piece, but can't find it just now.
One aspect of the debunking, iirc, was that, say one politician (let's just call him, I don't know, R?) did and said 100 bad things, and the other politician (let's say D) did and said only 25 bad things, it would be considered liberal media bias if the media printed 100 stories about bad things R did but only 25 stories about what D did.
Clearly, that should be called accuracy, not bias.
And that was just one of the myth-debunking factors noted.