Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnthem CEO: Participation in ACA exchanges after 2017 is conditional
http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/anthem-ceo-participation-in-aca-exchanges-after-2017-is-conditional/435316/Anthem CEO Joseph Swedish indicated in the health insurance giant's Q4 2016 earnings report that how its participation will proceed with the ACA exchanges after this year would depend on changes made by Congress to the federal healthcare law.
Swedish argued the ACA's individual market "has not been working well," according to an Axios report.
The company has lobbied for repealing the (currently suspended) health insurance tax, for reduced restrictions on pre-ACA health plans, fewer exemptions for special enrollments, and more stringent rules against patient steering, the report adds.
As one of the last remaining large payers in the nation with a significant footprint in the ACA exchanges, whatever decision Anthem makes will have an immense impact on the exchanges' stability. However, as is likely the case with most payers offering plans on ACA exchanges, Anthem is uncertain how to plan for the future as Congress weighs its options with healthcare reform. If we cant see stability going into 2018, with respect to either pricing, product, or the overall rules of engagement, then we will begin making some very conscious decisions with respect to extracting ourselves, Swedish said in a Wednesday conference call.
Anthem isn't the only payer weighing the benefits of selling health plans on ACA exchanges next year. Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini told investors on Tuesday that the company would not return to ACA exchanges it ceased participating in last year and may continue its withdrawal. Aetna announced in August 2016 that it would exit 536 of the 778 counties where it sold health plans.
Anthem is facing an antitrust lawsuit brought on by the Department of Justice last summer to block its pending $54 billion acquisition of Cigna. The other two insurance giants that also faced an antitrust lawsuit filed by the DOJ, Aetna and Humana, recently had their $37 billion merger blocked by the federal judge after Aetna left ACA exchanges as it had reportedly threatened to do if the deal was challenged by the government. While Anthem could use a similar tactic to Aetna's as leverage, Aetna's shareholders recently filed a lawsuit against the company arguing that it failed to asses how profitable the exchanges it left were.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 939 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anthem CEO: Participation in ACA exchanges after 2017 is conditional (Original Post)
flamingdem
Feb 2017
OP
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)1. It is remarkable to me so many working people insist
on paying profits to middle men.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)2. This CEO is holding many thousands of lives
in his hands. Will he consider that when withdrawing from ACA? Or will the profits for shareholders drive his decisions, not hard to guess what will prevail.
On the other hand enrollment was high this year and Anthem has a big chunk of the ACA market. They could really make the difference it whether it survives, of course depending on what the evil ones pull off.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)3. Well, if the mandate is removed, there will be no insurers in the program.
Similarly, if there is not adequate funding for subsidies, the program will fail. I can see getting out for either and hope Congress heeds their warning.
We all know a Public Option or Single Payer is likely best, but that ain't gonna happen for a long time, if ever.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)4. Gosh, I wonder what they'll do . . . . .
Maybe . . . stop participating?