Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA National Right to Vote
http://prospect.org/article/national-right-voteA National Right to Vote
Jamelle Bouie
June 26, 2012
Why we need to establish guaranteed access to the ballot booth.
Via Ed Kilgore comes a new move from Iowa Governor Terry Branstad to disenfranchise voters ahead of the presidential election:
On the day he took office, Branstad signed an order reversing a six-year policy started under Democrat Tom Vilsack in which felons automatically regained their voting rights once they were discharged from state supervision. The move flew in the face of a nationwide trend to make voting easier for felons, making Iowa one of four states where felons must apply to the governor to have voting rights restored. Branstads new process requires applicants to submit a credit report, a provision critics call inappropriate and unique among states.
Since then, 8,000 felons in Iowa have finished their prison sentences or been released from community supervision, but less than a dozen have successfully navigated the process of applying to get their citizenship rights back, according to public records obtained by the AP.
Since then, 8,000 felons in Iowa have finished their prison sentences or been released from community supervision, but less than a dozen have successfully navigated the process of applying to get their citizenship rights back, according to public records obtained by the AP.
I appreciate the honesty in thisBranstad wont even pretend that this isnt about reducing the Democratic share of the vote in an election year. In that, its similar to yesterdays admissionby Pennsylvania Republicanthat the states voter ID law is designed to keep Democrats from voting.
The broad problem here is that there isnt an affirmative right to vote in the Constitution. The broad assumption is that, if you want to vote, youll vote, and states arent at all incentivized to expand their electorates. Moreover, because states have wide latitude with regards to how they conduct elections, they have all the space they need to restrict voting rights without violating the letter of the law.
If were actually serious about democracy and participation, then we ought to have a voting rights amendment to the Constitution; guaranteed access to the ballot is the only way to avoid this partisan push to disenfranchise marginal citizens.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 935 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A National Right to Vote (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2012
OP
annabanana
(52,791 posts)1. I'll bet MOST Americans assume they have the RIGHT to vote...
Turns out? . . . not so much.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)2. exactly- I've been thinking about this a lot lately
we ought to have a voting rights amendment to the Constitution; guaranteed access to the ballot is the only way to avoid this partisan push to disenfranchise marginal citizens.