General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho is (and isnt) ditching the WHCA dinner
To go or not to go? Attendance at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner has been a topic of much debate in recent months as journalists prepare to put on formal wear and hobnob with a president who routinely bashes the press.
Advocates of attending say that it's just a dinner and showing up would provide some much needed comity. Others say it's a chance to celebrate journalism during a difficult period for the press.
snip
Axios: IN
BuzzFeed: OUT
The New Yorker: OUT
The New York Times: OUT
Politico: IN
Vanity Fair: OUT
The Washington Post: IN
http://www.poynter.org/2017/who-is-and-isnt-ditching-the-whca-dinner/448321/
Kittycow
(2,396 posts)I wonder why WaPo is going?
It's ludicrous, imo, to claim that this event will be celebrating journalism. Also I imagine that this year it won't a silly roast when it comes to the content of trump's speech. It will probably be a lengthy of verbal abuse.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,371 posts)Because covering the United States Government is their bread and butter
Kittycow
(2,396 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,371 posts)But there is most certainly value in attending such an event if for no other reason than to confer with colleagues
lpbk2713
(42,760 posts)Just to fill up the vacant seats.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)lpbk2713
(42,760 posts)coco22
(1,258 posts)demmiblue
(36,865 posts)RedWedge
(618 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)rickford66
(5,524 posts)Pay for the tables etc and leave them empty for the evening.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)I can't think of a comedian in the country who would kiss that ass the way he'd want.