Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,793 posts)
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:23 PM Feb 2017

Oklahoma and Wyoming Republicans agree women aren't people, disagree on just what they are

?1484079572

Republicans in Wyoming and Oklahoma are starting to drop the pretense that they consider women to be human beings. In Wyoming, the state Senate is considering three bills that would restrict women’s abortion rights. Two of them are being considered by the agriculture committee.


[Senate President Eli Bebout] said the labor and health committee is busy with a number of bills and the ag group had more time to thoroughly vet them.


Allegations that women are being equated to cattle are ridiculous, the Riverton Republican said.


Dude, you’re the one who handed the job of limiting what medical care women can get to the agriculture committee. In Oklahoma, Rep. Justin Henry isn’t trying to be even that subtle as he pushes a bill requiring women to get male approval for abortion. He’s ranking women somewhere below cattle:

Ultimately, he said, his intent was to let men have a say. “I believe one of the breakdowns in our society is that we have excluded the man out of all of these types of decisions,” he said. “I understand that they feel like that is their body,” he said of women. “I feel like it is a separate — what I call them is, is you’re a ‘host.’ And you know when you enter into a relationship you’re going to be that host and so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and don’t get pregnant,” he explained. “So that’s where I’m at. I’m like, hey, your body is your body and be responsible with it. But after you’re irresponsible then don’t claim, well, I can just go and do this with another body, when you’re the host and you invited that in.”


Read More: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/2/13/1633253/-Oklahoma-and-Wyoming-Republicans-agree-women-aren-t-people-disagree-on-just-what-they-are

____________________________________________

Dear Goddess! It is really time that we destroy the Republican Party once and for all! Trust me, I am dead serious here.

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oklahoma and Wyoming Republicans agree women aren't people, disagree on just what they are (Original Post) sheshe2 Feb 2017 OP
Ugh. Cracklin Charlie Feb 2017 #1
Holy shit!! angrychair Feb 2017 #2
"host" sheshe2 Feb 2017 #7
And here we see an adorable newborn picture of Rep. Justin Henry's birth from his host NickB79 Feb 2017 #20
Send that one to him! LOL! nt Ilsa Feb 2017 #26
shouldn't that be hostess lololol grantcart Feb 2017 #40
I LOL'd. CrispyQ Feb 2017 #41
They are a little gender confused. ;) sheshe2 Feb 2017 #44
Similar to the more popular "vessel" OldHippieChick Feb 2017 #13
If that's the case, by his definition, that makes the fetus a parasite. GoCubsGo Feb 2017 #15
This may be extreme Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2017 #3
The Thirteenth Amendment and Abortion CrispyQ Feb 2017 #12
I agree. It would be a powerful argument IMHO Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2017 #22
One of my arguments against those who call themselves 'right to life' CrispyQ Feb 2017 #43
But, see, the woman who was "irresponsible" committed a crime in their eyes. moriah Feb 2017 #23
"...the essence of involuntary servitude" sheshe2 Feb 2017 #24
On another note angrychair Feb 2017 #4
I know, right? mountain grammy Feb 2017 #32
They were a leader once... sheshe2 Feb 2017 #34
that is really sick. logosoco Feb 2017 #5
Wyoming was admitted to the Union as the "Equality State!" Tinker Trebucet Feb 2017 #6
... and yet Wyoming has disporpoprtionate weight in congress and the electoral college etherealtruth Feb 2017 #8
A host!?!?! The agriculture committee? Phoenix61 Feb 2017 #9
i fear in my lifetime barbtries Feb 2017 #10
I don't fucking "feel" like it's my body. Ilsa Feb 2017 #11
I Knew That Would Be The Hot Button Line ProfessorGAC Feb 2017 #16
Oh, I know where you were going with Ilsa Feb 2017 #25
Well, most women have their ears pierced; it should be easy to attach identity tags... brooklynite Feb 2017 #14
Please do not give them any ideas! sheshe2 Feb 2017 #36
Imagine the GOP squealing if women agreed to go along if men agreed to take the baby at birth. Vinca Feb 2017 #17
of course, is there any MONEY TO SUPPORT SAID OFFSPRING? pansypoo53219 Feb 2017 #18
Exactly. sheshe2 Feb 2017 #19
If this is what they are becoming, they need to be destroyed & replced w/sanity. AgadorSparticus Feb 2017 #21
I know Agador. sheshe2 Feb 2017 #27
Note the complete lack of responsibility on the part of the men. But the thing is this: when a man Squinch Feb 2017 #28
I love The Onion! caballojm Feb 2017 #29
The women of Wyoming and Oklahoma voted rethug kimbutgar Feb 2017 #30
He probably said that with a straight face after cutting funding for procon Feb 2017 #31
Love your chastity belt idea! sheshe2 Feb 2017 #38
going to be a mean heaven05 Feb 2017 #33
Mean vicious four years... sheshe2 Feb 2017 #37
Of course Republicons like these are men who equate rape with "relations" & rapists with fathers. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #35
Neanderthals, plain and simple. n/t SpankMe Feb 2017 #39
groan AllaN01Bear Feb 2017 #42
pretty much sums it up. Kimchijeon Feb 2017 #47
Disgusting colsohlibgal Feb 2017 #45
WTF, a "host" Kimchijeon Feb 2017 #46
First. Welcome to DU, Kim. sheshe2 Feb 2017 #48
The Handmaid's Tale. Rex Feb 2017 #49
You nailed it... sheshe2 Feb 2017 #50

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
20. And here we see an adorable newborn picture of Rep. Justin Henry's birth from his host
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:45 PM
Feb 2017


Wait, did I say host? I meant mother. Yeah, mother.....

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
15. If that's the case, by his definition, that makes the fetus a parasite.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:11 PM
Feb 2017

Goddamn, these so-called people make me sick.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,415 posts)
3. This may be extreme
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:33 PM
Feb 2017

Legislating Women's reproductive lives should be outlawed completely because they are- at the core- basically expecting women to be incubators (aka slaves) for potential children that are growing in their bodies whether they want to or not.

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
12. The Thirteenth Amendment and Abortion
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:55 PM
Feb 2017

I don't understand why the pro-choice movement doesn't use this argument more.

Forced Labor, Revisited: The Thirteenth Amendment and Abortion
Andrew Koppelman

http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=facultyworkingpapers

snip...

I. The basic argument
The Thirteenth Amendment reads as follows:
1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,
shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction.
2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by
appropriate legislation.


My claim is that the amendment is violated by laws that prohibit abortion. When
women are compelled to carry and bear children, they are subjected to "involuntary
servitude" in violation of the amendment. Abortion prohibitions violate the
Amendment's guarantee of personal liberty, because forced pregnancy and childbirth, by
compelling the woman to serve the fetus, creates "that control by which the personal
service of one man [sic] is disposed of or coerced for another's benefit which is the
essence of involuntary servitude.
"6

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,415 posts)
22. I agree. It would be a powerful argument IMHO
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:51 PM
Feb 2017

Perhaps publicly bringing up comparisons to slavery are a bit too "touchy", politically speaking? Some of the more extreme elements of the anti-choice movement frequently use Holocaust and Eugenics comparisons. Forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, however, clearly robs women of their freedom, autonomy, and agency.

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
43. One of my arguments against those who call themselves 'right to life'
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 06:28 PM
Feb 2017

is that when you place life in a hierarchy, like how men are valued over women, how white men are valued over men of color, then the argument has changed from right-to-life, to right-to-some-life. Regarding slavery, black men got the vote before women & a black man was president before a woman, that's how far down the ladder we are. If these troglodyte supremacists have their way, a clump of cells will have more rights than living breathing women. They truly do view us as property. I've never been so discouraged for the future of women in this country.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
23. But, see, the woman who was "irresponsible" committed a crime in their eyes.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:56 PM
Feb 2017

She OMG had the audacity to ovulate!

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
4. On another note
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:34 PM
Feb 2017

What truly sad is that WY was the first state in which woman got the right to vote. It even refused to join the union unless women continued to retain the right to vote...50 years before the rest of the country.

Now it has devolved into this pile of shit.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
5. that is really sick.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:36 PM
Feb 2017

And while I agree the entire planet would be much better off with the down fall of the repub party, what these women really need is education. I always felt like the repubs are well aware that any health care limits for women is totally against the Constitution, but they run with it because they know they can get votes from these types of people.

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
9. A host!?!?! The agriculture committee?
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:46 PM
Feb 2017

What do say to that? I mean really? What do you say? It is so wrong on so many, many levels. My forehead is going to be completely flat by the time this shit is over.

barbtries

(28,799 posts)
10. i fear in my lifetime
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:48 PM
Feb 2017

they will never go away.

naive as i am i thought they'd fade the way of the whigs and tories after gw. no need to tell me how wrong i was.

these stories by the way made my jaw drop. unreal.

and does that OK motherfucker understand that sometimes in spite of all precautions a woman gets pregnant?1

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
11. I don't fucking "feel" like it's my body.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 03:52 PM
Feb 2017

I fucking OWN IT.

Women across America need to hear about the Ag committee looking at Women's healthcare.

ProfessorGAC

(65,078 posts)
16. I Knew That Would Be The Hot Button Line
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:13 PM
Feb 2017

Thanks Ilsa for confirming my thought. What a stupid thing to say! That would have been a stupid thing to hear when i was in college in the early and mid 70's. It's even stupider now, 40+ years later.

Not only stupid, but it doesn't even make sense.

Edited for clarity: I meant that idiot in Oklahoma or Wyoming or wherever. Not you!

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
25. Oh, I know where you were going with
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 05:02 PM
Feb 2017

Your comment.

I can't get pregnant any more, but I wonder how those lawmakers would feel about being told that their bodies are forced hosts for say, blood donations? Or plasma donations which take longer? Or being test subjects for drug companies?

They try to make distinctions between planned vs unplanned pregnancies, as if it can always be controlled.

sheshe2

(83,793 posts)
19. Exactly.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:43 PM
Feb 2017

What really ticks me off is they don't give a dayum about mother or child once it is born. Just look at the GOP trying to shut down PP and ACA. Have the baby honey and forgo prenatal care, it doesn't make any sense.

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
21. If this is what they are becoming, they need to be destroyed & replced w/sanity.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:50 PM
Feb 2017

Uuuugh, this gets me angry!!

Squinch

(50,956 posts)
28. Note the complete lack of responsibility on the part of the men. But the thing is this: when a man
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 05:13 PM
Feb 2017

enters into a relationship if he doesn't want his partner to have an abortion when she is someone who is likely to get an abortion, then he needs to make sure she doesn't get pregnant. After he is irresponsible and she gets pregnant, he can't claim, "Well now I get a say in what happens to THE WOMAN'S BODY."

procon

(15,805 posts)
31. He probably said that with a straight face after cutting funding for
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 05:29 PM
Feb 2017

fact base sex ed and free/cheap birth control methods for any woman one who needs them. Not surprisingly, this Neanderthal dumps all the responsibility for getting pregnant on the woman, while giving the men who impregnate them a free pass... oh, and all the Viagra they need to keep on begetting.

They make chastity belts for men -- hey, I just looked it up! -- so girlfriends, lets get all the menfolk outfitted in a steel cage so we really can control our own bodies!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
33. going to be a mean
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 05:33 PM
Feb 2017

Last edited Tue Feb 14, 2017, 10:14 AM - Edit history (1)

vicious 4 years for all not white, male and followers of the KKKristian religion. And I am damn sure that the women who voted for these clowns hate themselves that much to allow cretin knuckledraggers to make decisions about their bodies. Sad indeed.

sheshe2

(83,793 posts)
37. Mean vicious four years...
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 05:58 PM
Feb 2017

yes it will be. I have one hell of a mad on right now and it will not stop anytime soon. Do it loud and proud. INSIST. PERSIST. RESIST. EXIST. That will be my sign at the next march. My friend and I are already making plans.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,011 posts)
35. Of course Republicons like these are men who equate rape with "relations" & rapists with fathers.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 05:36 PM
Feb 2017

They want to allow rapists to sue women to prevent them from aborting.

And you know when you enter into a relationship you’re going to be that host


Also, they continually blame the victim.

And try to restrict alimony arrangements.

And restrict women's access to contraception.

so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and don’t get pregnant

Kimchijeon

(1,606 posts)
46. WTF, a "host"
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:38 AM
Feb 2017

How about this, if I am "hosting" a tumor or tapeworm or even a stray facial hair guess what, I am going to exercise my autonomous will whatever the fuck someone says.

I guaran-fuckin' tee that if a man was "host" we'd have free access to termination services and birth control as a national-funded right. As I recall more than one comedian saying something to the effect of "there would be a planned parenthood on every block, along with loyalty cards where after 5 you get one free" (Perhaps Bill Burr mentioned it recently if my memory serves?)

So nonsensical, because these dudes can just fuck right off into the sunset and not pay child support anyway. It's just to protect their pweshious widdle fee-fees.

As the "host" I can kick guests out whether I invited 'em or they showed up unannounced, cause why? It's my fuckin' house!

What laughable idiocy.

sheshe2

(83,793 posts)
48. First. Welcome to DU, Kim.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:42 AM
Feb 2017

Second. Yup. It is your body as mine is my own. Our bodies ourselves and no asshole will be taking that away from us.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
49. The Handmaid's Tale.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 12:50 AM
Feb 2017

Fuck GOPukers from one ear and out the other! What is it with Repulsivican males and their inadequacies with their performance as males? Why punish women for that?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oklahoma and Wyoming Repu...