General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOklahoma and Wyoming Republicans agree women aren't people, disagree on just what they are
?1484079572Republicans in Wyoming and Oklahoma are starting to drop the pretense that they consider women to be human beings. In Wyoming, the state Senate is considering three bills that would restrict womens abortion rights. Two of them are being considered by the agriculture committee.
[Senate President Eli Bebout] said the labor and health committee is busy with a number of bills and the ag group had more time to thoroughly vet them.
Allegations that women are being equated to cattle are ridiculous, the Riverton Republican said.
Dude, youre the one who handed the job of limiting what medical care women can get to the agriculture committee. In Oklahoma, Rep. Justin Henry isnt trying to be even that subtle as he pushes a bill requiring women to get male approval for abortion. Hes ranking women somewhere below cattle:
Ultimately, he said, his intent was to let men have a say. I believe one of the breakdowns in our society is that we have excluded the man out of all of these types of decisions, he said. I understand that they feel like that is their body, he said of women. I feel like it is a separate what I call them is, is youre a host. And you know when you enter into a relationship youre going to be that host and so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and dont get pregnant, he explained. So thats where Im at. Im like, hey, your body is your body and be responsible with it. But after youre irresponsible then dont claim, well, I can just go and do this with another body, when youre the host and you invited that in.
Read More: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/2/13/1633253/-Oklahoma-and-Wyoming-Republicans-agree-women-aren-t-people-disagree-on-just-what-they-are
____________________________________________
Dear Goddess! It is really time that we destroy the Republican Party once and for all! Trust me, I am dead serious here.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Just eff off, nasty old republicans!
angrychair
(8,702 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 13, 2017, 04:03 PM - Edit history (1)
That guy in OK called women a "host"!?!?!?
It feels like something out of an Alien movie.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)Wait, did I say host? I meant mother. Yeah, mother.....
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)sheshe2
(83,793 posts)OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)n/t
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Goddamn, these so-called people make me sick.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,415 posts)Legislating Women's reproductive lives should be outlawed completely because they are- at the core- basically expecting women to be incubators (aka slaves) for potential children that are growing in their bodies whether they want to or not.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)I don't understand why the pro-choice movement doesn't use this argument more.
Andrew Koppelman
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=facultyworkingpapers
snip...
I. The basic argument
The Thirteenth Amendment reads as follows:
1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,
shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction.
2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by
appropriate legislation.
My claim is that the amendment is violated by laws that prohibit abortion. When
women are compelled to carry and bear children, they are subjected to "involuntary
servitude" in violation of the amendment. Abortion prohibitions violate the
Amendment's guarantee of personal liberty, because forced pregnancy and childbirth, by
compelling the woman to serve the fetus, creates "that control by which the personal
service of one man [sic] is disposed of or coerced for another's benefit which is the
essence of involuntary servitude."6
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,415 posts)Perhaps publicly bringing up comparisons to slavery are a bit too "touchy", politically speaking? Some of the more extreme elements of the anti-choice movement frequently use Holocaust and Eugenics comparisons. Forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, however, clearly robs women of their freedom, autonomy, and agency.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)is that when you place life in a hierarchy, like how men are valued over women, how white men are valued over men of color, then the argument has changed from right-to-life, to right-to-some-life. Regarding slavery, black men got the vote before women & a black man was president before a woman, that's how far down the ladder we are. If these troglodyte supremacists have their way, a clump of cells will have more rights than living breathing women. They truly do view us as property. I've never been so discouraged for the future of women in this country.
moriah
(8,311 posts)She OMG had the audacity to ovulate!
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)angrychair
(8,702 posts)What truly sad is that WY was the first state in which woman got the right to vote. It even refused to join the union unless women continued to retain the right to vote...50 years before the rest of the country.
Now it has devolved into this pile of shit.
mountain grammy
(26,626 posts)devolved says it all.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)How far they have fallen.
logosoco
(3,208 posts)And while I agree the entire planet would be much better off with the down fall of the repub party, what these women really need is education. I always felt like the repubs are well aware that any health care limits for women is totally against the Constitution, but they run with it because they know they can get votes from these types of people.
Tinker Trebucet
(17 posts)WTF happened?
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Lucky us
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)What do say to that? I mean really? What do you say? It is so wrong on so many, many levels. My forehead is going to be completely flat by the time this shit is over.
barbtries
(28,799 posts)they will never go away.
naive as i am i thought they'd fade the way of the whigs and tories after gw. no need to tell me how wrong i was.
these stories by the way made my jaw drop. unreal.
and does that OK motherfucker understand that sometimes in spite of all precautions a woman gets pregnant?1
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)I fucking OWN IT.
Women across America need to hear about the Ag committee looking at Women's healthcare.
ProfessorGAC
(65,078 posts)Thanks Ilsa for confirming my thought. What a stupid thing to say! That would have been a stupid thing to hear when i was in college in the early and mid 70's. It's even stupider now, 40+ years later.
Not only stupid, but it doesn't even make sense.
Edited for clarity: I meant that idiot in Oklahoma or Wyoming or wherever. Not you!
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Your comment.
I can't get pregnant any more, but I wonder how those lawmakers would feel about being told that their bodies are forced hosts for say, blood donations? Or plasma donations which take longer? Or being test subjects for drug companies?
They try to make distinctions between planned vs unplanned pregnancies, as if it can always be controlled.
brooklynite
(94,604 posts)sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Vinca
(50,279 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,981 posts)babies are not free.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)What really ticks me off is they don't give a dayum about mother or child once it is born. Just look at the GOP trying to shut down PP and ACA. Have the baby honey and forgo prenatal care, it doesn't make any sense.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Uuuugh, this gets me angry!!
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)They don't even try to hide it anymore. The F**KING Agricultural Committee !!!!
Squinch
(50,956 posts)enters into a relationship if he doesn't want his partner to have an abortion when she is someone who is likely to get an abortion, then he needs to make sure she doesn't get pregnant. After he is irresponsible and she gets pregnant, he can't claim, "Well now I get a say in what happens to THE WOMAN'S BODY."
caballojm
(272 posts)This IS from The Onion right? Please tell me this is from The Onion ... sigh.
kimbutgar
(21,164 posts)This is what they get.
procon
(15,805 posts)fact base sex ed and free/cheap birth control methods for any woman one who needs them. Not surprisingly, this Neanderthal dumps all the responsibility for getting pregnant on the woman, while giving the men who impregnate them a free pass... oh, and all the Viagra they need to keep on begetting.
They make chastity belts for men -- hey, I just looked it up! -- so girlfriends, lets get all the menfolk outfitted in a steel cage so we really can control our own bodies!
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 14, 2017, 10:14 AM - Edit history (1)
vicious 4 years for all not white, male and followers of the KKKristian religion. And I am damn sure that the women who voted for these clowns hate themselves that much to allow cretin knuckledraggers to make decisions about their bodies. Sad indeed.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)yes it will be. I have one hell of a mad on right now and it will not stop anytime soon. Do it loud and proud. INSIST. PERSIST. RESIST. EXIST. That will be my sign at the next march. My friend and I are already making plans.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)They want to allow rapists to sue women to prevent them from aborting.
Also, they continually blame the victim.
And try to restrict alimony arrangements.
And restrict women's access to contraception.
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,268 posts)when will it ever stop. groan
Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)They can go to Hell, this so annoyed me. How dare they, good grief.
Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)How about this, if I am "hosting" a tumor or tapeworm or even a stray facial hair guess what, I am going to exercise my autonomous will whatever the fuck someone says.
I guaran-fuckin' tee that if a man was "host" we'd have free access to termination services and birth control as a national-funded right. As I recall more than one comedian saying something to the effect of "there would be a planned parenthood on every block, along with loyalty cards where after 5 you get one free" (Perhaps Bill Burr mentioned it recently if my memory serves?)
So nonsensical, because these dudes can just fuck right off into the sunset and not pay child support anyway. It's just to protect their pweshious widdle fee-fees.
As the "host" I can kick guests out whether I invited 'em or they showed up unannounced, cause why? It's my fuckin' house!
What laughable idiocy.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Second. Yup. It is your body as mine is my own. Our bodies ourselves and no asshole will be taking that away from us.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Fuck GOPukers from one ear and out the other! What is it with Repulsivican males and their inadequacies with their performance as males? Why punish women for that?
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)and so did she~
No fucking with women.