Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:27 PM Feb 2017

Should Bernie Sanders start his own political party?

Senator Bernie Sanders is still a hero to millions on the left, especially those disaffected with the Democratic Party. Sanders, who caucuses with the Democrats but has always been an Independent, showed during the primary that he could galvanize passionate supporters but couldn't capture the Democratic nomination. Sanders' fans say he was treated unfairly and should just start his own party. Others think he should try to reform the Democrats.

Many Berniecrats think the Democratic Party is just too corrupt for reform. They say corporations will always call the shots in that party, and they are urging Sanders to found a new one:

But Bernie has said he would prefer to work with in the existing Democratic Party to make it more progressive.

Plenty of Bernie's critics in the Democratic Party would be thrilled to see him go start his own. They're tired of his critiques, still angry that he wanted to primary President Obama in 2012, and point out that after they gave him so much influence over writing their platform, he continues to bash Democrats. The Democrats will never be "progressive" enough for him, so he should go do his own thing.

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/02/should_bernie_sanders_start_hi.html
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Bernie Sanders start his own political party? (Original Post) SecularMotion Feb 2017 OP
No... dhill926 Feb 2017 #1
Come on now--we have one common enemy. Kingofalldems Feb 2017 #2
Hail No. kerouac2 Feb 2017 #3
NO Eyeball_Kid Feb 2017 #4
NO. Warpy Feb 2017 #5
No. He needs to do exactly what he's been doing - The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2017 #6
No hollowdweller Feb 2017 #7
No. butdiduvote Feb 2017 #8
No! burrowowl Feb 2017 #9
No. Doodley Feb 2017 #10
Don't go there ---- I'm saying this as a Democrat AND a supporter of Bernie Sanders LongTomH Feb 2017 #11
No, stop it n/t riverwalker Feb 2017 #12
ABSOLUTELY! Chasstev365 Feb 2017 #13
I'm open. Equinox Moon Feb 2017 #14
Not just no. Hell no. we can do it Feb 2017 #15
No. Jane Austin Feb 2017 #16
No. n/t GP6971 Feb 2017 #17
HAHAHA!!! greytdemocrat Feb 2017 #18
Kick SecularMotion Feb 2017 #19
No, and he's not going to, so this is someone else's hot air JHB Feb 2017 #20
He needs to retire with all the other septeugenarians. randome Feb 2017 #21
you are kidding, right? DrDan Feb 2017 #22
This is so disgusting. nikibatts Feb 2017 #23
Other than independent? MyNameGoesHere Feb 2017 #24
What better way to stop the dominance of the Republican Party SticksnStones Feb 2017 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Feb 2017 #26
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read. NO. If Bernie started his own party, it would split the octoberlib Feb 2017 #27
Well he kinda did tavernier Feb 2017 #28
LOL. Anyone who would answer affirmatively would be permabanned from DU. aikoaiko Feb 2017 #29
Keep fighting that primary, kids! Iggo Feb 2017 #30
Yelling at walls does not require one to start their own party. NCTraveler Feb 2017 #31
Hell to the No. theglammistress Feb 2017 #32
Practically, probably not.......... socialist_n_TN Feb 2017 #33
The Democratic Party will never become the Progressive Party SecularMotion Feb 2017 #34
Sure it can. It's done it before and it can do it again........ socialist_n_TN Feb 2017 #36
The only party he should start is a retirement party NoGoodNamesLeft Feb 2017 #35
No TransitJohn Feb 2017 #37
I thought we already had this goddamned discussion ad nauseam? Blue_Tires Feb 2017 #38
Stop it already. It's over! OVER! NurseJackie Feb 2017 #39
Absolutely! If we want to ensure a permanent Republican majority Dream Girl Feb 2017 #40
No, for Jebus' sake. MineralMan Feb 2017 #41

Warpy

(111,276 posts)
5. NO.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:30 PM
Feb 2017

If the GOP collapses, THAT will open the door to the formation of a progressive party.

Until then, it's a fool's errand.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,734 posts)
6. No. He needs to do exactly what he's been doing -
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:30 PM
Feb 2017

which is try to shove the Democratic Party back to its New Deal principles. Anyhow, third parties don't work well at all on the national level because of the Electoral College. Sometimes third party candidates can get elected in state and local elections but that's as far as they can get.

butdiduvote

(284 posts)
8. No.
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:31 PM
Feb 2017

Bernie's most ardent supporters should quit insisting their way is the only way. The Democratic Party is a big-tent party with room for lots of voices, and you're not always going to get your perfect candidate.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
11. Don't go there ---- I'm saying this as a Democrat AND a supporter of Bernie Sanders
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:33 PM
Feb 2017

It will harm the Democratic party.

It will also, potentially, delegitimize Bernie Sanders and his continuing support to build a progressive movement within the Democratic party, and I think that is what this article is trying to do.

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
13. ABSOLUTELY!
Mon Feb 13, 2017, 11:33 PM
Feb 2017

NOT!

We need to move the Democratic Party back to its New Deal roots, Truman and Johnson's fighting spirit, and Kennedy's inspiration.

Bernie is not that person.

Can anyone do it at least SOME of that?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
21. He needs to retire with all the other septeugenarians.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:11 AM
Feb 2017

Sorry if that's ageist but this country needs new blood and new thinking. The GOP is in the same position.

 

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)
23. This is so disgusting.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:12 AM
Feb 2017

NO. I will try to quote this accurately to Bernie supporters

It is still"easier to fool people than to convince them that they have already been fooled."

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
24. Other than independent?
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:15 AM
Feb 2017

I don't know. He should stay as an independent probably. I am not sure joining multiple parties shows a conviction of beliefs. It could appear someone is shopping for a Goldilocks party.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
25. What better way to stop the dominance of the Republican Party
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:16 AM
Feb 2017

Than to split up the Democratic Party.

Great plan! What could possible go wrong? Besides a few more generations of Republican barbarians at the gate.

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
27. This is the dumbest thing I've ever read. NO. If Bernie started his own party, it would split the
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:21 AM
Feb 2017

party and ensure a permanent Republican presidency. Bernie would never go along with this.

tavernier

(12,392 posts)
28. Well he kinda did
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:35 AM
Feb 2017

and how did that work out for both our candidates?

No tomatoes please; I love them both.

aikoaiko

(34,172 posts)
29. LOL. Anyone who would answer affirmatively would be permabanned from DU.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:45 AM
Feb 2017

In fact if a known Bernie supporter had posted this OP they would have been banned.
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
31. Yelling at walls does not require one to start their own party.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 08:47 AM
Feb 2017

The thought process that it would be "his own political party" is very telling. I find that his most ardent supporters are the ones who know him the least.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
33. Practically, probably not..........
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 09:10 AM
Feb 2017

Philosophically, that depends on the party and its platform.

Practically to split from the Democratic Party at this time, ESPECIALLY if the new party ran candidates in all elections, would be to split the "leftish" vote and ensure the Republicans would win pretty much everything. Now if the Republicans split, which IMO IS a possibility, then all bets are off. This scenario is something that I've been expecting to happen eventually, I'm just not sure of the timing.

But philosophically, another party could be in the cards IF the centrist Democrats continue their stranglehold on the levers of power in the Democratic Party. The progressive wing is even now gaining influence with the masses with leadership of the current demonstrations, the resistance to the Trump agenda. When 15 Dem Senators vote to confirm EVERY one of Trump's picks for governmental posts, there's a YUGE split in the works. A big tent isn't big enough sometimes, especially if the tent excludes the majority. Are Sanders style progressives the majority of the Party? Who knows at this point, but I DO think that they are gaining this status with every concession to Trumpism by the centrists.

But I don't think that Bernie would be the one to lead any new party. If you just want to "reform" capitalism, you might as well stick with the Dems and try to make it more progressive and LESS neo-liberal and Reaganlike. Since Bernie supports capitalism, he should stick with the Dems and try to change them.

But a workers' party that explicitly puts people's needs over capitalists profits, even if it doesn't start as anti-capitalist in name, could very well be a reality within the next few years. Anything less than that and you might as well stick with and try to reform the Democrats.

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
36. Sure it can. It's done it before and it can do it again........
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 10:43 AM
Feb 2017

If the US is on the brink of a workers' revolution within the next couple of years, the Dems will turn "progressive" faster than you can say the word. Of course, that "progressivism" will only be social democratic in form (like FDR) and ONLY in order to stave off that workers' revolution (just like the FDR era), but yeah it'll turn to Bernie style progressivism rather than that alternative. Of course, it might also compromise with the fascists to stave off that workers' revolution too. Which side they compromise with depends on the social forces at work at the time.

Compromise is what the Dems are built for. In the last 50 years or so, it's been compromise with the right, but if a true left becomes ascendant, then they'll compromise with them too. Anything to keep capitalism in place.

 

Dream Girl

(5,111 posts)
40. Absolutely! If we want to ensure a permanent Republican majority
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 10:59 AM
Feb 2017

It would be just what the doctor ordered for them. The hubris of that man. I think he has done enough to "good" already

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
41. No, for Jebus' sake.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 11:04 AM
Feb 2017

He should either join the Democratic Party officially or step back and criticize from outside. He is not a Democrat already. If he wishes to start his own party, then he should do that. If that is not his wish, he should join the Democratic Party.

I'm tired of discussing Sanders at this point. That time has passed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Bernie Sanders sta...