Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NotThisTime

(3,657 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 01:10 PM Feb 2017

Can someone give me a history lesson Blunt vs. Chaffetz who can investigate & watergate?


OK, so it's obvious Blunt has said yes on an investigation, Chaffetz has said no... can they each have their own investigations (or not) and Watergate, I always hear it wasn't the crime it was the coverup. Now, given my age, I honestly don't know how it applies to today. It seems maybe it applies? I don't really know... and if it did, how could they prove Pence and/or Trump knew, maybe they didn't leave a trail?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone give me a history lesson Blunt vs. Chaffetz who can investigate & watergate? (Original Post) NotThisTime Feb 2017 OP
There was a special prosecutor in charge. Here is a refresher: Tanuki Feb 2017 #1
Thanks, seems the first problem would be Sessions would never appoint a special prosecutor....? NotThisTime Feb 2017 #2
And if he did, how "independent" would that person be? Tanuki Feb 2017 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone give me a his...