Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nolabear

(41,987 posts)
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 03:23 PM Feb 2017

Watch for a Scientific American story on tRump's mental health, based on the NYT letter.

One of my friends who signed the letter was contacted and interviewed about it. I assume they're contacting the others as well. It's a risk they're taking and I hope they get much support. The other side is vicious.

Give them some love when it breaks. It's supposed to be a fast-turnaround story so should come and go quick.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Watch for a Scientific American story on tRump's mental health, based on the NYT letter. (Original Post) nolabear Feb 2017 OP
oh boy bdamomma Feb 2017 #1
There's so much worry about diagnosing en absentia but these folks are putting it out there. nolabear Feb 2017 #3
I'm sorry what letter? GusBob Feb 2017 #2
Sorry. A letter to the NYT re that man's mental health. nolabear Feb 2017 #4
BOOM!!!! GusBob Feb 2017 #6
Ouch. Dear Leader's not going to like that. Vinca Feb 2017 #9
Those two are retired, but who are the others who are risking their professions? It takes... TreasonousBastard Feb 2017 #5
There are thirty-five in total that signed. nolabear Feb 2017 #7
K&R. Be sure to post again when it breaks. NT Ilsa Feb 2017 #8
If that happens I will lose all respect for them loyalsister Feb 2017 #10
I understand. There's a real problem with the catch-all term "mentally ill." nolabear Feb 2017 #11
There are enough reasons to be worried about his presidency loyalsister Feb 2017 #12

nolabear

(41,987 posts)
3. There's so much worry about diagnosing en absentia but these folks are putting it out there.
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 03:28 PM
Feb 2017

They'll take heat for it, but there's so much evidence. I'm conflicted about getting out there but I support them fully.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
5. Those two are retired, but who are the others who are risking their professions? It takes...
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 03:42 PM
Feb 2017

a lot to get them to go public.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
10. If that happens I will lose all respect for them
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 04:46 PM
Feb 2017

This diagnosis from afar is irresponsible and just plain dumb.


The psychiatrist who wrote the guide to personality disorders says diagnosing Trump is “bullshit”

Allen Frances is a psychiatrist who wrote the rules for diagnosing personality disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The DSM is the No. 1 tool mental health professionals have for making diagnoses.

Frances, a professor emeritus at Duke, doesn’t mince words about what he thinks of mental health professionals who are now using the DSM to diagnose President Donald Trump with a mental disorder. “What’s going on is bullshit,” he says.


What’s missing in Gartner’s diagnosis, according to Frances, is the key element to diagnosing all mental illness: suffering.

“Everyone has a personality,” Frances says. “It’s not wrong to have a personality; it’s not mentally ill to have a personality. It’s only a disorder when it causes extreme distress, suffering, and impairment.”

Trump’s willingness to lie and endless self-promotion are traits that have, so far, worked out largely to his advantage. He’s president of the United States, after all.


more...
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/10/14551890/trump-mental-health-narcissistic-personality


nolabear

(41,987 posts)
11. I understand. There's a real problem with the catch-all term "mentally ill."
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 05:05 PM
Feb 2017

You can't x-ray for it, and you can't guarantee any kind of cure that will address the myriad things that come under that rubric. It's so broad that there are often no overlaps in symptoms that are referred to by that term.

The letter doesn't use that term. It's specific about concerns that he is stable and that there are dangers to him being in his position.

There isn't a diagnosis. But as I said I understand the sentiment. If they didn't think this was very, very important they wouldn't take the risk.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
12. There are enough reasons to be worried about his presidency
Tue Feb 14, 2017, 05:42 PM
Feb 2017

without perpetuating the devastating stigma that goes with mental illness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Watch for a Scientific Am...