General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLies upon lies upon lies.
Sally Yates, acting Atty-General, informed White House Counsel three weeks ago that there was evidence against General Flynn that might make him vulnerable to blackmail from the Russians. The WH fired Sally Yates. They did nothing about General Flynn. He continued to sit in on the most secret meetings of our country.
Just two days ago, Donald Trump said he knew nothing about it? Did the WH counsel not tell him the information that was transmitted by Sally Yates? Either the WH counsel is miserably incompetent or he colluded with "someone" to keep the information under wraps? In either circumstance, the WH counsel should be immediately removed and questioned about his motives.
The lies are getting too deep to wade through. Did the WH counsel inform Trump of the report from Sally Yates? Is that why he fired her? Did General Flynn contact the Russians illegally on the orders of Donald Trump? How many people in the Trump Administration knew about the Flynn story and helped to cover it up?
We have to get to the bottom of this. No one csn be permitted to lie themselves out of this jungle of deceit.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)There is no way that all of this information could be summarized in less than 9 bullet points and put on an index card.
Docreed2003
(16,863 posts)This morning when he tweeted railing against leaks!!! They actually think they can gloss over this turd in the punchbowl like it's no big deal. They only acted because the media exposed their bullshit and Trumplethinskin just couldn't resist throwing a hissy fit on Twitter.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Bullshit Mountain Range needs a better name.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)WaPo report on Friday, trump bought himself time to see how much legs the story would get.
It got plenty...
He HAD to act last night.