Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would social equity hurt the rich? (Original Post) SoutherDem Jun 2012 OP
Yes. Instead of having a billion dollars, they'd only have 950 million dollars. onehandle Jun 2012 #1
To FEEL really rich, you must extract service from the poor at SDjack Jun 2012 #2
It's a matter of perception rather than actuality. PDJane Jun 2012 #3
It's not enough for them to be rich, we have to be poor, bemildred Jun 2012 #4
with only angstlessk Jun 2012 #5
Should we really give a shit? sadbear Jun 2012 #6

SDjack

(1,448 posts)
2. To FEEL really rich, you must extract service from the poor at
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jun 2012

less than a living wage. It is a matter of bragging rights at the country club.

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
3. It's a matter of perception rather than actuality.
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jun 2012

Instead of looking at the large picture, they are looking at their own narrow interests.

The fact of the matter is that the rich would be safer, richer, and more connected to the world they live in if they didn't hoard the world for themselves. Lots of money makes things easier, but it tends to leave you without a moral compass and with a lot of judgmental anger. The US cannot continue to use 28% of the world's resources for 5% of the population; when you take it down to the 99% vs. 1%, the number of people who are running the show is so small as to be negligible in the grand scheme of things, and that small number of people are vulnerable, in spite of their money...or maybe because of their money.

The likelihood that the economy will collapse from the weight of those at the top gets greater every year, too; the number of civilizations that have gone for precisely the same reasons should be etched in stone somewhere, along with the ways that they collapsed, as an object lesson for those who believe in the Rand theory of unfettered greed being good for a society.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. It's not enough for them to be rich, we have to be poor,
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 07:10 PM
Jun 2012

Otherwise their egos will not be fed enough.

“Men nearly always speak and write as if riches were absolute, as if it were possible, by following certain scientific precepts, for everybody to be rich. Whereas riches are a power like that of electricity, acting only through inequalities or negations of itself. The force of the guinea you have in your pocket depends wholly on the default of a guinea in your neighbors pocket. If he did not want it, it would be of no use to you; the degree of power it possesses depends accurately on the need or desire he has for it, – and the art of making yourself rich, in the ordinary mercantile economist's sense, is therefore equally and necessarily the art of keeping your neighbor poor.” – John Ruskin “Unto the Last”

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
5. with only
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 07:33 PM
Jun 2012

nine hundred and ninety trillion, eight hundred and ninety billion, nine hundred and ninety million, eighth hundred and fifty thousand and seven hundred and eighty dollars to be had......the rich want them ALL!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would social equity hurt ...