General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP House Mice Put Trump Before Country
YUP.
http://cdn.thedailybeast.com/content/dailybeast/articles/2017/02/15/gop-house-mice-put-trump-before-country/jcr:content/image.crop.800.500.jpg/49571297.cached.jpg
Carlos Barria / Reuters
GOP House Mice Put Trump Before Country
The tough guys who were rolling up their sleeves to get President Clinton even before the election are awfully quiet now.
Michael Tomasky
02.15.17 12:03 AM ET
I take you back in time now to a story from last October, by The Washington Posts Dave Weigel. I remember well the pit that formed in my stomach as I read the headline: House Republicans are already preparing for years of investigations of Clinton.
Weigel nabbed an interview with Utah Congressman Jason Chaffetz, chair of the House Oversight Committee, who said this: Its a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, weve got two years worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it aint good.
Back when he and just about everyone else thought the next president was going to be named Clinton, Chaffetz was tellingbragging to, actuallyone of the countrys top political reporters that President Clinton was going to be investigated immediately.........................
But she is not the president. Donald Trump is. And he, we have decent reason to suspect, may have directed Mike Flynn to negotiate with Russia in the midst of the presidential campaign. We dont know this of course. ........................
This would seem to be something wed want to find out.
And what does Chaffetz say now about all this, after Flynns resignation? Its taking care of itself, he told a Politico reporter. Let the intelligence committee do it, Chaffetz said.
Well, that might be OK. In jurisdictional terms, Chaffetz actually has a point. But David Nunes, the California Republican who chairs intel, says, per Vox, that he wont look into anything having to do with what Trump may or may not have said to Flynn. He cites executive privilege.
Trump of course wasnt the chief executive at the time in question, late December.
So I think I have this right. Here are the new rules: If youre a Democratic president-elect, the Republican-dominated House of Representatives will start investigating you before youve even interviewed possible Treasury secretaries. But if youre a Republican president-elect, you can maybe violate the Logan Act and undermine the sitting presidentwith the countrys top global adversary, no lessand, well, you can just do that. Chaffetz, obviously feeling heat, did agree Tuesday afternoon to do something, but not about Russia. He sent Reince Priebus a mealy-mouthed letter saying gosh, golly, sir, maybe the president of the United States could try not to talk about a matter like a North Korean missile launch in public.
Cha
(297,733 posts)riversedge
(70,311 posts)Search Results
ap·pa·rat·chik
ˌäpəˈräCHik/
nounhistorical
a member of a communist party apparat.
derogatoryhumorous
an official in a large political organization.
plural noun: apparatchiks
"Tory apparatchiks"
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman 17h17 hours ago
The point is that the sickness runs deep; Trump is horrible, but a horror made possible by GOP corruption and lack of conscience 6/
83 replies 1,054 retweets 2,114 likes
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman 17h17 hours ago
And in primaries, with a smaller, older, more racist electorate, the threat is always from the right. So no reason to challenge Trump ... 5/
24 replies 279 retweets 629 likes
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman 17h17 hours ago
Here a polarized electorate means that the vast majority of Rs face no contest in general election; their voters get their news from Fox 4/
33 replies 298 retweets 641 likes
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman 17h17 hours ago
And what the big money wants is tax cuts and deregulation; it will forgive anything if it gets those. But what about the voters? 3/
25 replies 380 retweets 811 likes
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman 17h17 hours ago
First of all, they'apparatchiks -- certainly in the House. Every one of them works for the big money, and knows it 2/
21 replies 352 retweets 820 likes
Paul Krugman @paulkrugman 17h17 hours ago
Worth thinking about the reasons Rs in Congress won't hold Trump accountable unless there's an obvious wave election looming 1/
77 replies 933 retweets 1,957 likes