Simple: The Buck Stops At Trump. He's the Commander in Chief. If He Won't Take Responsibility

[KittyWampus]

he should be raked over the coals.

It's very simple. No nuance to this at all.

He made the decision. He was presumably presented with options.

The fact he made that decision without all the principles at the table AND that the military operation happened with no one in the Situation Room... just amplifies the fact he's incompetent along with irresponsible.

[atreides1]

1. He's never taken responsibility, before!

Why would he be expected to take responsibility now! If something becomes a cluster f**k, he will point the finger at someone else, like blaming the "Generals" for the Yemen failure!

He only takes credit for anything that he had absolutely nothing to do with!

[spanone]

2. the Clown-in-Chief takes responsibility for nothing.

[brush]

3. Yes. He made the decision to go in whereas Obama had rejected it because of not enough intel

Now he's blaming the military.

Just as he recently blamed his once again bragging about his huge EC win claim as information just given to him.

Everybody is to blame for his fuck ups but him.

[Miles Archer]

4. He won't, and he won't.

Mitch McConnell doesn't like the tweets, but he's "a fan of what he's been doing."

McConnell and Ryan are actively blocking the Russia and Tax Return inquiries.

He won't take responsibility, and he won't be raked over the coals by the people in a position of power to do anything about it.

He won't.