General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHolding HOLDER Accountable?? Goldman Sachs Lied To Their Customers And Congress, no problem!
Last edited Thu Jun 28, 2012, 07:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Congress seems a bit selective on who they hold accountable, and which betrayals they think have affected Americans the most...
Taibbi argues that Goldman Sachs executives lied when they testified in front of Congress in the aftermath of the crisis. Unlike other commentators who grouse about how Wall Street execs should be tossed in jail, Taibbi actually provides specifics. He takes quotes from some of the Goldman execs who testified, including CEO Lloyd Blankfein and CFO David Viniar, and then juxtaposes them with what he believes to be the truth at the time.
And at least as Taibbi tells it, the statements do appear to be misleading, if not outright false.
One of the biggest frustrations most people have about the financial crisis is that no one has yet been held accountable for it. In prior crashes--the S&L collapse, the 1987 crash, the dotcom bubble--prosecutors had a field day parading villains in front of TV cameras. And yet, this time, despite the financial crisis ushering in the worst recession since the Great Depression, no big shots have gone to jail.
Taibbi vents about this. He also observes that prosecutors have just brought massive, high-profile perjury cases against athletes like Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds, but apparently can't or won't do the same with Wall Street executives.
One explanation for this, of course, is that prosecutors don't think the Wall Street execs are guilty of anything. But Taibbi thinks the explanation is more insidious: An institutionalized double-standard, stemming from the fact that many prosecutors and regulators someday hope to work at Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/matt-taibbi-goldman-sachs-executives-lied-customers-congress-175044553.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)I dunno what that will do to the WH staff but Holder is free to prosecute.
Ghost of Huey Long
(322 posts)well what is he waiting for?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)would be my guess.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)The U.S. Attorney General (Holder) has discretion as to whether to enforce or not enforce the statute.
If Holder or anyone else is auditioning for a future job with Wall Street, there is no way to compel them to enforce the law.
Ghost of Huey Long
(322 posts)Holder would save his reputation and illustrate to Americans what accountability really means.
Coexist
(24,542 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Huey P. Long
(1,932 posts)Get on board for the big 'win'!
Ghost of Huey Long
(322 posts)Someone needs to go after their hypocritical asses.
Seems like a perfect time for Holder to start holding some real criminals accountable.
Huey P. Long
(1,932 posts)he will be going after the corporate criminals, wake up. My first post was sarcasm, btw.
Today he's a hero!
Ghost of Huey Long
(322 posts)that is why I started a new one...