Sean Hannity is claiming that Wikileaks is more patriotic than our own CIA and intelligence agencies

[anneboleyn]

Folks, Trump and co are trying to destroy this country by polluting Americans' trust in our most important institutions. This is all Putin and Russian agitprop crap at the most basic level. Sean Hannity, the dumb 10:00-11:00 "host" on Fox, has gone totally psycho overboard about the Deep State, as they call it following Alex Jones. He is now on Faux shooting his irresponsible mouth off about how Wikileaks has released what the evil, "Deep State" CIA is *really* doing. He is speaking to the conservative radio star Laura Ingraham (who to be honest I have always thought had ties to Pooty -- she adopted Russian children and spent lots of time over there, which of course wouldn't mean anything on its own, but she has become weirdly, aggressively pro-Russian, Putin-friendly, and pro-wikileaks, and now she happily chatters along with Hannity about how the people should ONLY LISTEN TO THEIR DEAR LEADER as the media and the FBI and CIA and congress etc can't be trusted. Dust off the old agitprop Laura!). Hannity keeps using the verb "destroy" to describe every critique that ANYONE levels against Trump. If they criticize the DEAR LEADER, they are traitors, trying to DESTROY the country. This now includes our own intelligence agencies.

Now, just when Putin's pick Trump is getting heat from the FBI and our intelligence agencies, wikileaks drops a big steaming pile of shit designed to undermine our confidence, even basic belief, in our intelligence agencies. Whaaaaat a coincidence. Yeah.

Hannity is too stupid to think about the effects of what he is saying. What if Trump wants to go to war tomorrow claiming "intelligence" has shown us that it's necessary? Of course Hannity would believe it then. But otherwise, like the stooge but rather dangerous mouthpiece he is, he is CITING WIKILEAKS AND TELLING AMERICANS NOT TO BELIEVE THE CIA. Hannity and Laura are actively inviting the not-so-bright pro-Trump Hannity audience to doubt the very institutions that maintain our country and protect our liberties and protect us from foreign infiltration, at least until now...

Of course Hannity doesn't bother to mention the fact that wikileaks has became a vicious pro-Russian propaganda machine (pretty much everyone is admitting this now), and certainly revealed their true colors during the campaign. Now, just when Pooty-Putin's pick Trump is getting heat from the FBI and our intelligence agencies, wikileaks drops a big steaming pile of shit designed to undermine our confidence, even basic belief, in our intelligence.

Hannity is too stupid to think about the effects of what he is saying. What if Trump wants to go to war tomorrow claiming "intelligence" has shown us that it's necessary? Of course Hannity would believe it then. But otherwise, like the stooge but dangerous mouthpiece he is, he is CITING WIKILEAKS AND TELLING AMERICANS NOT TO BELIEVE THE CIA.

[gordianot]

1. Pure madness, welcome to cyber war.

[sarcasmo]

2. Did RT and Fox finally merge?

[TheBlackAdder]

3. Did Hannity's balls drop yet, or is he still singing soprano at Boy's Town on the weekends?

[duncang]

4. Not only that

If it is true they also have the hacking tools. Wikileaks is talking about making available to anyone. Just think what kind of damage the U.S. and worldwide may incur. Long time back when the backdoor virus came out it seemed like every wanna be hacker was trying it. It ended up not being as bad as first feared. But it did cost money for those infected. Something like what has been described could cause a lot of damage. And all the time Dipshit donnie was wearing a "I heart wikileaks" shows where his loyalties lie. With his self, not the American people.

[ronnie624]

5. I never believe anything the CIA says.

Dissiminating propaganda -- more often false than true -- is one of its primary functions. It has committed crimes all over the world, and caused problems for many people.

I definitely do not feel patriotic about the CIA. The notion is absurd, in fact.