Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 08:09 AM Mar 2017

You just know that if we had been allowed the peoples choice for president

Chaffetz would be inventing ways to investigate her, and would say that we should not be allowing any President under investigation by congress, let alone by the FBI, to nominate a SCOTUS justice.

Ryan would still be hammering away that anyone under investigation for security breaches should not be given sensitive intelligence information.





Her personal finances and her foundation would be undergoing legal cavity searches - despite all that has been done before, with no wrongdoing found.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You just know that if we had been allowed the peoples choice for president (Original Post) ehrnst Mar 2017 OP
I can deny none of what you say. dchill Mar 2017 #1
Yes. treestar Mar 2017 #2
yes...they would have been relentless.... samnsara Mar 2017 #3
Wow--excellent point. Orrex Mar 2017 #4
People don't get or want to hear - we had a bloodless coup Cosmocat Mar 2017 #5
There was much tension and chaos when Obama was elected. A lot of it. ehrnst Mar 2017 #7
You make an excellent point. Rhiannon12866 Mar 2017 #6

Orrex

(63,213 posts)
4. Wow--excellent point.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 08:17 AM
Mar 2017

Her SCOTUS nominees would be blocked until the FBI had completed its investigation, which would then be followed by another delay while an "independent" special prosecutor completed an investigation of its own.

Naturally, these would drag on through Clinton's entire first term and through all of her second.

Cosmocat

(14,565 posts)
5. People don't get or want to hear - we had a bloodless coup
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 08:19 AM
Mar 2017

and had Hillary won, the tension and chaos now would be FAR worse.

There WOULD have been hordes of right wingers rolling to DC with "second amendment" displays, and DJT would NOT have conceded. The talk now would be fire breathing ILLEGITIMATE!

The energy these asshats use to defend 45 would have been ramped up on steroids against Hillary, as noted, over complete fabricated bullshit like Benghazi and e-mails.

And, has she won with two more D senators, and tried to seat a SCJ, people would have died.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
7. There was much tension and chaos when Obama was elected. A lot of it.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 08:43 AM
Mar 2017

There were hordes of right wingers rolling into DC with their second amendment displays.

And the talk of him being "illegitimate!"

This time however, we would have had certain angry, put out "progressive" politicians carping at our POTUS' every decision, and every nominee for not being "too establishment" for their tastes, and claiming that we didn't win by "enough" white male working class votes.

And that would have been worse, in my estimation, than any undermining by the GOP for the Democratic Party.

Rhiannon12866

(205,467 posts)
6. You make an excellent point.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 08:23 AM
Mar 2017

After all they got away with obstructing Obama, they would have doubled down on Mrs. Clinton. And she already had the misfortune to have had the most abusive opponent in history.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You just know that if we ...