Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Dare You Question Our Precious Nominee?
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/03/senate_republicans_are_outraged_that_anyone_would_question_neil_gorsuch.htmlHow Dare You Question Our Precious Nominee?
Republicans broke every rule to block Merrick Garland. Now, theyre outraged that anyone would challenge Neil Gorsuch.
By Dahlia Lithwick
It is an article of faith among Senate Republicans that everything liberals do is just goddamn awful, from the unelected left-wing justices who legislate from the bench to the blocking of Robert Bork in 1987 to the lame cries for equal treatment of everyone under the law. Indeed, Senate Republicans have so mastered the art of outsize umbrage that at Mondays hearing for Judge Merrick Garland Neil Gorsuch, to fill a Supreme Court seat they themselves blocked and obstructed for over a year, the one note of agreement they sounded was an angry one. They are angry that Democrats believe an Obama nominee should have been afforded the courtesy of a hearing and a vote. They are angry that their nomineewho was picked by the president with promises about how he would vote in abortion and gun caseswill surely be asked about how he will vote in abortion and gun cases. But mostly they are really just incredibly steamed that Senate Democrats are even a little bit mad. Because anger is sort of the Republicans thing.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, was furious that the cardinal principles of separation of powers and respect for an independent judicial branch are not being honored by Senate Democrats. This is the same Chuck Grassley who pre-emptively attacked the Supreme Court and its chief justice last spring for any attempts to politicize the court vacancy. GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch lectured the Judiciary Committee about the fact that the Senate owes the president deference over his judicial nominees. Hearing this, Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont about fell out of his chair.
snip//
In the glare of all this furious umbrage, some of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee responded with the standard toolkit of those who have been lifelong victims of abusive rage disorder. They expressed some dismay. They promised to try harder. They occasionally invoked the words Merrick Garland, but because they have no words to express fury or betrayal, they quickly reverted to showy performances of temperate reasonableness at which Senate Democrats excel. Doctrine was reasonably invoked. Chevron was fussed at. Some of the Democratic senators actually managed a creditable display of genuine frustration about GOP hypocrisy. This reached its high point with the metaphorical unfreezing of the frozen truckera plaintiff in a case whose plight the nominee once cruelly dismissed. In an epic hurling of shade, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin said, It was 14 degrees below. So cold, but not as cold as your dissent, Judge Gorsuch.
A few of the Democrats appeared ready to rumble, if rumbling involves offering up many case citations. The Republicans fury, by contrast, was unbridled: How dare Democrats put their nice nominee through the indignity of a hearing on the merits when they could instead just lie down on the Senate floor and form a human red carpet for the judge to walk?
The nominee was very emotional and eloquent about his daughters, black robes, and farm animals. He is extremely likeable. He named little guys he has, in the past, supported. That seemed to make the GOPs rage burn even hotter. Who would dare attack a guy who likes chickens and original public meaning?
If youre keeping score after Day 1: Senate Democrats have now defrosted a trucker, name-checked Merrick Garland, and been lectured that Senate Republicans have no choice but to be mean because Democrats have no judicial theory, no coherent strategy, and no intellectual right to fill Scalias seat. On the other side of the aisle, the GOP has nothing but bottomless umbrage. Its taken them this far. Why would they stop now?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 1560 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post