General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP cravenly uses black woman at Gorsuch hearings
I am sure everyone watching the Gorsuch confirmation hearings has noticed the smiling, young, attractive black woman strategically placed above Gorsuch's right shoulder so that she is in EVERY camera frame of Gorsuch. She is obviously there to give the impression that she is somehow connected to him, to dress up the otherwise very white GOP flacks flanking Gorsuch and to suggest Gorsuch has the support of African Americans.
Gorsuch has nothing to do with her, and she does not represent African American opinion. She is Mary Elizabeth Taylor, former Koch intern and aide to House Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Taylor was paid $37,264.40 as a Senate Cloakroom Assistant. http://heavy.com/news/2017/03/mary-elizabeth-taylor-who-is-woman-sitting-behind-neil-gorsuch-hearings/amp/ I wonder how much she is getting paid to "cloak" Gorsuch...
JI7
(89,250 posts)SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,807 posts)mzteaze
(448 posts)I saw her on screen at the gym this morning..... Ugh.
SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)Gorsuch is so obviously rehearsed. He has yet to make a candid statement. He is revoltingly fake and smarmy. He will be to the right of Scalia.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)Baconator
(1,459 posts)... fully aware of how some people may perceive it.
No one forced her.
Based on what is in the OP, she is a conservative GOP agent so I don't know what is so shocking.
SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)There is no doubt she is letting them use her. The point is not that it is shocking, but that it is shameless, dishonest manipulation of the viewers of the hearing.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)What's dishonest about it? Are you suggesting that there are no people of a hue other than white in the conservative wing? Is the GOP only allowed to bring forward folks of a certain melanin content?
I might get it if she were a member of the screen actors guild specifically hired to portray something that she is not. As it is, she appears to be exactly what she is.
A conservative agent who is hoping for this confirmation to go through and she happens to be a person of color.
SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)Hmmmm?
Baconator
(1,459 posts)I just don't think it's dishonest if she is who she says she is.
She really is a right leaning conservative with a vested interest in seeing this thing go through. She really is Mitch McConnell's aide.
How do you think that conversation should have gone? Sorry Ms. Taylor (Mrs?), you can't sit there because folks of your particular ethnicity don't represent a significant enough portion of our voter base.
SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)He does not.
And she is not telling anyone who she is. She is just sitting there, inches away from Gorsuch in all the TV frames.
Do you think anyone can ask to sit in that TV chair behind Gorsuch? Seriously? Do you think it was her idea to sit there? Why put a no-name aide front and center like this?
And even if this whole deception was her idea, does that make it any less a craven GOP deception?
Baconator
(1,459 posts)You agreed that she isn't there against her will.
Is it inappropriate for an aide of the Senate majority leader to be present and visible at a SCOTUS confirmation hearing?
Should she not be allowed out in public, in this or any other occasion, lest she give the appearance that a person of color supports or works for a conservative?
SunSeeker
(51,561 posts)She is welcome to come out in public, but the chairs immediately adjacent to Gorsuch are not open to members of the public. You're just being silly now. You already acknowledged this was "an attempt to portray a diverse supporting cast." Now you seem to want to just argue with me.
I'm not letting you waste any more of my time.
Bye.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)She is, according to the OP, an aide to the Senate majority leader. What is inappropriate about someone with that job sitting in one of those seats? I doubt you'd feel as strongly about Mr. Bob Smith with a Swedish heritage with the same job but a different skin tone.
Do you feel as strongly about all attempts to display diversity? Are no people of color allowed at any televised conservative events?
Do you think that there has a been a widely publicized political event that doesn't take into account who is going to be seen behind the candidate? Are people of color only allowed to be seen behind candidates you approve of?
Maybe you should make a list.
I just don't see what you are advocating for here. If it is appropriate for her, as an aide to the senior Senator, to sit in this type of hearing then who should have told her no due solely to her race?
Idoru
(167 posts)Are you seriously turning this into a racist attack?
I've watched countless nomination hearings and those seats are almost always filled by family and friends, supporters of the nominee. WTF is some random aide doing there, rack your brain.
And as a black woman myself, it makes me sick.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)It seems utterly appropriate for someone with that job title to sit in on this hearing.
Are you suggesting that no aide or representative of people in power, in the history of confirmation hearings, has ever sat in on or been seen on the televised video feed?
I hate to break it to you but she is a supporter of the nominee.
Maybe that's where you are getting stuck. You just can't understand that a person of color could be a conservative. Look at who she chose to work for. Mitch freakin' McConnell.
I won't deny that she is a rarity. She's like a Log Cabin Republican. She works for people who have no interest in supporting a demographic to which she belongs. Given all of that, she has no obligation to hide away.
If you think it is inappropriate for an AA aide to a conservative be seen in public, even though she's doing her job, then just say that.
Orrex
(63,213 posts)Response to SunSeeker (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed