Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gorsucks refusal to name billionaires backing him (Original Post) gibraltar72 Mar 2017 OP
he claims not to be involved in politics, yet he has secret billionaires advertising for him unblock Mar 2017 #1
And, he wouldn't answer a simple yes or no question about dark money. SunSeeker Mar 2017 #2
He is just another Trump Hemorrhoid Angry Dragon Mar 2017 #3

unblock

(52,240 posts)
1. he claims not to be involved in politics, yet he has secret billionaires advertising for him
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 04:07 PM
Mar 2017

dangerous precedent to give a lifetime post on the high court to someone with heavy backers who might be foreign, might be criminals, etc.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
2. And, he wouldn't answer a simple yes or no question about dark money.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 04:08 PM
Mar 2017

He absolutely refused to answer Senator Whitehouse's simple yes or no question: Are you bothered by the fact that we do not know who is spending $10 million to support your appointment?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gorsucks refusal to name ...