Trumpcare 2.0 Still Isnt Cruel Enough to Satisfy Conservatives

[deminks]

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/03/ahca-heritage-action-trumpcare-paul-ryan

After conservatives in the House threatened to block the GOP's plan to repeal and replace Obamacare, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) released an amendment Monday night aimed at cutting even more benefits for the poor. The Republican plan would now make enrolling in Medicaid even more difficult, with states encouraged to add a work requirement for adults who want to get insurance. States would also now be allowed to accept Medicaid as a block grant—a system that would allow state governments to offer fewer health insurance benefits.

Ryan's changes have the support of President Donald Trump, but they apparently don't go far enough to appease right-wing activists. Heritage Action, a prominent conservative advocacy group tied to the Heritage Foundation think tank, announced Tuesday that it is still doesn't think the GOP plan goes far enough in repealing Obamacare. The organization says it plans to pressure house Republicans to vote against the bill when it comes to the floor. (The vote is currently scheduled for Thursday.)

Michael Needham, Heritage Action's CEO, said on Twitter that the group "will be keyvoting against" the bill in its annual scorecard for members of Congress. To translate that into non-Washington speak, the group will downgrade its rating of any lawmaker who votes for the GOP plan.

(snip)

According to a tabulation by the New York Times, there are currently 48 Republicans in the House who are hesitant about voting for the bill or are outright opposed. Assuming every Democrat votes against the measure, Trumpcare will go down in defeat if just 22 Republicans vote no on the bill. That would be just one more set-back for Ryan's keg-fueled dreams of slashing Medicaid.

(end snip)

[Freddie]

1. My Repug congresscritter is actually voting against it for the right reason

We have a huge problem with addiction here (Philly burbs) and he's opposed to reduced mental health treatments requirements. Not that I'd ever vote for an R, but I have a little more respect for Brian Fitzpatrick.