General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge Gorsuchs Opinion in Whistleblower Case (truck driver) Reveals the Dishonesty of his.....
Judge Gorsuchs Opinion in Whistleblower Case Reveals the Dishonesty of his Alleged Strict Textualism
https://www.zuckermanlaw.com/judge-gorsuchs-opinion-whistleblower-case-ominous-sign-worker-protections/
If Judge Neil Gorsuch is confirmed, he will play a critical role in construing laws that protect worker health and safety, including laws protecting whistleblowers who suffer retaliation for opposing illegal or unsafe conduct that jeopardizes public health and safety. According to the Bureau of Labor Standards, 4836 workers were killed on the job in 2015on average, thats more than 93 a week, or more than 13 deaths every day. As the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is already severely understaffed and will soon be further weakened by a political appointee charged with gutting it, the last thing workers need is an activist judge who has expressed disdain for worker-protection laws. But that is exactly what we can expect from Judge Gorsuch.
In a recent dissent in TransAm Trucking, Inc. v. Administrative Review Board, 833 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2016), Judge Gorsuch demonstrated that he will construe worker-protection laws as narrowly as possible and that he deems worker health and safety as ephemeral and generic statutory goals. His opinion also reveals that his alleged values-neutral approach to statutory construction is intellectually dishonest. The majority decision affirming the whistleblowers win at the Department of Labor was based on the plain meaning of the statute, well-established precedent construing the statutory term at issue, and the purpose of the statute. Judge Gorsuchs dissent, however, was arguably activist in that it rewrites the statute. In other words, Judge Gorsuch does not check his policy preferences or values at the courthouse door and render value-neutral decisions based on the dictionary definitions of statutory terms. Instead, as this opinion demonstrates, his alleged strict textualism appears to be a cloak for his policy preferences, including his apparent disdain for worker protection laws.
Background of TransAm Trucking Whistleblower-Retaliation Case
Alphonse Maddin worked as a truck driver for TransAm Trucking, Inc. (TransAm). He was driving a tractor-trailer down an Illinois freeway on a subzero night in 2009, when he noticed that his truck was nearly out of gas. He pulled over because he could not find a fuel station, and ten minutes later, the trailers brakes locked up due to the frigid temperatures. Mr. Maddin was unable to resume driving the tractor-trailer and reported the trucks unsafe condition to a TransAm dispatcher. The dispatcher told Mr. Maddin that a repairperson would be sent to fix the brakes.
Mr. Maddin dozed off briefly and awoke to find that his torso was numb and he could not feel his feet. He told the dispatcher about his physical condition and asked when the repairperson would arrive. (H)ang in there, the dispatcher responded.
Half an hour later, Mr. Maddin called his supervisor, Larry Cluck, and told Mr. Cluck that his feet were going numb and that he was having difficulty breathing. Mr. Cluck told Mr. Maddin not to leave the trailer and gave him two options: drag the trailer with inoperable brakes, or stay put until the repairperson arrives. Mr. Maddin knew that dragging the trailer is illegal and concluded that he might not live much longer if he were to wait for a repairperson. So, Mr. Maddin unhitched the trailer and drove off.
more at link above
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)I like to see how long Gorsuck could live in those conditions.