Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf tRump went to prison for something other than Russia, would it satisfy?
If no one else involved had to answer for collusion, but we were absolutely sure that our intelligence agencies were still working on the problem in the background, would it be enough?
I'm not so sure that there will ever be full disclosure.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1679 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If tRump went to prison for something other than Russia, would it satisfy? (Original Post)
ProudLib72
Apr 2017
OP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,734 posts)1. It could be financial crimes - they got Al Capone for tax evasion.
I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is up to his neck in something like racketeering, tax evasion and money laundering.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)4. Capone is who I was thinking of
If we could ask people from back then if they were satisfied... Of course, he wasn't the president of the U.S. either!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)2. Patrick Fitzgerald said something interesting when he indicted Scooter Libby
I keep coming back to this.
This is from memory, but the quote was something like, "when a prosecutor sees an infraction, his duty is to secure a conviction. The particular legal instrument used to secure that is not in itself important."
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)3. whatever it takes to put him away